SERVING MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL / MINNESOTA
Donate Now Sustaining Member


Our major sponsors




Sponsor of
Second Opinion



Our major advertisers


Our in-kind partners


MinnPost thanks these generous donors:

INDIVIDUALS AND FOUNDATI0NS
Blandin Foundation
Otto Bremer Foundation
Bush Foundation
Sage & John Cowles
David & Vicki Cox
Toby & Mae Dayton
Jack & Claire Dempsey
Ethics and Excellence in Journalism Foundation
Sam & Stacey Heins
John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
Joel & Laurie Kramer
Lee Lynch & Terry Saario
Martin & Brown Foundation
The McKnight Foundation
The Minneapolis Foundation
The Saint Paul Foundation
Rebecca & Mark Shavlik

(See all donors here.)

POLITICAL AGENDA

  • Switch to Small Text Size
  • Switch to Medium Text Size
  • Switch to Large Text Size
Email Print Submit a Comment

    Coleman-Franken trial: In no uncertain terms, Franken side opposes Coleman injunction attempt and seeks sanctions

    By Jay Weiner | Published Fri, Feb 20 2009 12:46 pm

    The lawyerly language heated up today as Al Franken's lawyers told the three-judge panel in a stern memo that Norm Coleman's attempt to block the redaction of 933 recounted votes "flies in the face" and serves to "eviscerate" an earlier court order.

    Under Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure, the Franken side is even seeking unspecified sanctions against Coleman's lawyers.

    It all stems from this morning's filing by Coleman lawyers of a motion seeking a temporary injunction.

    In a document, Franken lawyer David Lillehaug wrote: "Having stipulated that the 933 ballots were properly counted, they cannot urge now — in this case or any other — that those ballots were not properly counted ... In the middle of an extraordinarily important, historic, expedited proceeding, [Coleman] has burdened the Court with a motion that seeks to abrogate a solemn stipulation and an order of this very Court. This is a direct attack on the integrity of the Court and the entire judicial process."

    A hearing on the matter is expected later today. But the fact that some of the 933 have been redacted has left the matter up in the air.

    Like what you just read? Support high-quality journalism in Minnesota by becoming a member of MinnPost.

    Advertisement:

    2 Comments: Hide/Show Comments

    E-mail address

    Password

     

    Forgot Password? | Register to Comment

    MinnPost does not permit the use of foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that may be libelous or interpreted as inciting hate or sexual harassment. User comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure that comments meet these standards and adhere to MinnPost's terms of use and privacy policy.

    We intend for this area to be used by our readers as a place for civil, thought-provoking and high-quality public discussion. In order to achieve this, MinnPost requires that all commenters register and post comments with their actual names and place of residence. Register here to comment.




    minnpost.com/politicalagenda



    Political Agenda is a place for quick-hit news about Minnesota's political scene and players. MinnPost's staff, including Joe Kimball and Doug Grow, will contribute items about local and state government, plus national political doings that have a Minnesota angle. Items will appear throughout the day, so check back often.

    MinnPost Topic Pages



    Recent Political Agenda Posts