SERVING MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL / MINNESOTA
Donate Now Sustaining Member


Our major sponsors




Sponsor of
Second Opinion



Our major advertisers


Our in-kind partners


MinnPost thanks these generous donors:

INDIVIDUALS AND FOUNDATI0NS
Blandin Foundation
Otto Bremer Foundation
Bush Foundation
Sage & John Cowles
David & Vicki Cox
Toby & Mae Dayton
Jack & Claire Dempsey
Ethics and Excellence in Journalism Foundation
Sam & Stacey Heins
John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
Joel & Laurie Kramer
Lee Lynch & Terry Saario
Martin & Brown Foundation
The McKnight Foundation
The Minneapolis Foundation
The Saint Paul Foundation
Rebecca & Mark Shavlik

(See all donors here.)

POLITICAL AGENDA

  • Switch to Small Text Size
  • Switch to Medium Text Size
  • Switch to Large Text Size
Email Print Submit a Comment

    Rep. Greiling, education advocate, lambastes comments from head of teachers' union

    By Doug Grow | Published Fri, Mar 20 2009 6:42 pm

    How tough is the state budget crisis?

    So tough that two usual allies -- the DFL and Education Minnesota, the teachers’ union --  are at big-time odds.

    In a message to some of her Minnesota House colleagues late this afternoon, Rep. Mindy Greiling, DFL-Roseville, the chair of the House K-12 education finance committee, blistered Tom Dooher, president of Education Minnesota, for his criticism of the House K-12 funding plan.

    Wrote Greilling: “I am just incensed, as I’m sure you are, about the public statements made by ED MN President Tom Dooher about our House DFL education plan. Despite extreme angst about other budget cuts, many of our members, certainly including me, fought mightily to make our budget prioritize education. ... Does he not realize we are facing a $7.5 billion deficit, counting inflation, and that it was an amazing feat for us to still hold education harmless when we put forward a serious budget, unlike the Governor??!!’’

    Greiling was referring to comments Dooher made to the media and posted on Education Minnesota’s website.

    Dooher was critical of the House plan, which he says calls for “flat education funding’’ for the next four years. In the statement, Education Minnesota noted that the House plan differs from the Senate plan, which calls for a 7 percent reduction in K-12 education funding, and the plan forwarded by Gov. Tim Pawlenty that proposes “a modest K-12 funding increase, but mostly for Q Comp and test score improvement.’’

    “Adusting for inflation, this (House) budget could result in kids getting less individual attention and fewer opportunities for learning over the next four years,’’ Dooher was quoted as saying on the website. “Coming on top of the cuts most districts are facing, this proposal is not helpful.”

    Like what you just read? Support high-quality journalism in Minnesota by becoming a member of MinnPost.

    Advertisement:

    9 Comments: Hide/Show Comments

    E-mail address

    Password

     

    Forgot Password? | Register to Comment

    MinnPost does not permit the use of foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that may be libelous or interpreted as inciting hate or sexual harassment. User comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure that comments meet these standards and adhere to MinnPost's terms of use and privacy policy.

    We intend for this area to be used by our readers as a place for civil, thought-provoking and high-quality public discussion. In order to achieve this, MinnPost requires that all commenters register and post comments with their actual names and place of residence. Register here to comment.




    minnpost.com/politicalagenda



    Political Agenda is a place for quick-hit news about Minnesota's political scene and players. MinnPost's staff, including Joe Kimball and Doug Grow, will contribute items about local and state government, plus national political doings that have a Minnesota angle. Items will appear throughout the day, so check back often.

    MinnPost Topic Pages



    Recent Political Agenda Posts