SERVING MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL / MINNESOTA

MinnPost.com Job Listing of the Day!
MinnPost.com Job Listing of the Day!

Browse
Minnesota Jobs
Direct from Company Websites!

Unadvertised,
Current,
Highest-quality

Start Searching Now!

 







 

POLITICAL AGENDA

  • Switch to Small Text Size
  • Switch to Medium Text Size
  • Switch to Large Text Size
Recommend to a friend Print Submit a Comment

    Officials support rail corridor that skirts downtown Rochester

    By Joe Kimball | Published Tue, May 12 2009 11:01 am

    Top state officials, including Congressman Tim Walz, Sen. Amy Klobuchar and Gov. Tim Pawlenty, said today that they support moving a major train corridor around Rochester’s south side, routing trains away from downtown Rochester and the Mayo Clinic to reduce safety risks and allow for future development.

    That future development would include the proposed high-speed rail line between St. Paul and Chicago. Rochester officials hope it will swing by Rochester, rather than following existing train tracks that run from St. Paul to Winona.

    The proposed move would be a rerouting of the Dakota, Minnesota and Eastern (DM&E) rail line that bisects downtown Rochester, which includes the Mayo Clinic campus. The trains would then run about 48 miles from Dover in Olmsted County to just West of Dodge Center. The $325 million project would provide freight rail service and an option of an adequate right-of-way for future high-speed passenger service.

    Mayo Clinic officials have expressed serious concerns about the economic and patient safety challenges CP rail line presents to the Mayo’s Rochester campus.

    Walz, Klobuchar and Pawlenty met last week in Washington with Mayo Officials to discuss the four funding options for the corridor: (1) funding through the Surface Transportation Bill reauthorization; (2) funding through a loan application by the State of Minnesota to the Federal Railroad Administration; (3) funding obtained by applying for American Recovery and Reinvestment Act dollars from the federal Department of Transportation; and (4) state share of bonding dollars to leverage federal funds.

    There's more information on the Southern Rail Corridor proposal online.

    Like what you just read? Support high-quality journalism in Minnesota by becoming a member of MinnPost.

    Advertisement:

    2 Comments: Hide/Show Comments

    2 Comment: Hide/Show Comment

    0 Comments:

    E-mail address

    Password

     

    Forgot Password? | Register to Comment

    MinnPost does not permit the use of foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that may be libelous or interpreted as inciting hate or sexual harassment. User comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure that comments meet these standards and adhere to MinnPost's terms of use and privacy policy.

    We intend for this area to be used by our readers as a place for civil, thought-provoking and high-quality public discussion. In order to achieve this, MinnPost requires that all commenters register and post comments with their actual names and place of residence. Register here to comment.




    minnpost.com/politicalagenda



    Political Agenda is a place for quick-hit news about Minnesota's political scene and players. MinnPost's staff, including Eric Black, G.R. Anderson, Joe Kimball, David Brauer, Doug Grow and MinnPost Washington correspondent Cynthia Dizikes will contribute items about local and state government, plus national political doings that have a Minnesota angle. Items will appear throughout the day, so check back often.

    Recent Political Agenda Posts