SERVING MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL / MINNESOTA
Donate Now Sustaining Member


Our major sponsors




Sponsor of
Second Opinion



Our major advertisers


Our in-kind partners


MinnPost thanks these generous donors:

INDIVIDUALS AND FOUNDATI0NS
Blandin Foundation
Otto Bremer Foundation
Bush Foundation
Sage & John Cowles
David & Vicki Cox
Toby & Mae Dayton
Jack & Claire Dempsey
Ethics and Excellence in Journalism Foundation
Sam & Stacey Heins
John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
Joel & Laurie Kramer
Lee Lynch & Terry Saario
Martin & Brown Foundation
The McKnight Foundation
The Minneapolis Foundation
The Saint Paul Foundation
Rebecca & Mark Shavlik

(See all donors here.)

POLITICAL AGENDA

  • Switch to Small Text Size
  • Switch to Medium Text Size
  • Switch to Large Text Size
Email Print Submit a Comment

    Legislature considers whether hunting and fishing license data should be private or public

    By Joe Kimball | Published Fri, May 15 2009 10:22 am

    Should the information you enter when buying a hunting or fishing license be public data available to anyone? That's the question being debated at the Legislature, says the Bemidji Pioneer.

    Sen. Mary Olson, DFL-Bemidji, wants to keep it private. And she's chair of the omnibus data practices bill conference committee.

    But Mark Anfinson, attorney counsel for the Minnesota Newspaper Association, says such data should be public and open government lobbyists are trying to find a compromise Olson can accept.

    The state DNR's database has information about licenses and permits involving hunting, fishing, trail use, recreational vehicles and other activities, Anfinson said. The database has been off limits for the past three years because the DNR has been using motor vehicle and driver’s license data, thus skirting federal restrictions on public access.

    “But next year the DNR will discontinue that use, and so whether public access is restored will depend on what the Legislature decides this session,” Anfinson informed MNA members. “The Senate has taken the position that all of the DNR licensing and permit data should be classified as private, ignoring decades of public access to this information, which produced many benefits and virtually no documented problems.”

    Olson thinks it should be private.  “This is personal data that people have to give in order to be able to go fishing, or in order to go hunting, so it’s not as though they have a choice," she said. "They have to provide this information if they want to be able to do the kinds of things that are within the jurisdiction of the DNR.”

    Like what you just read? Support high-quality journalism in Minnesota by becoming a member of MinnPost.

    Advertisement:

    1 Comment: Hide/Show Comment

    E-mail address

    Password

     

    Forgot Password? | Register to Comment

    MinnPost does not permit the use of foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that may be libelous or interpreted as inciting hate or sexual harassment. User comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure that comments meet these standards and adhere to MinnPost's terms of use and privacy policy.

    We intend for this area to be used by our readers as a place for civil, thought-provoking and high-quality public discussion. In order to achieve this, MinnPost requires that all commenters register and post comments with their actual names and place of residence. Register here to comment.




    minnpost.com/politicalagenda



    Political Agenda is a place for quick-hit news about Minnesota's political scene and players. MinnPost's staff, including Joe Kimball and Doug Grow, will contribute items about local and state government, plus national political doings that have a Minnesota angle. Items will appear throughout the day, so check back often.

    MinnPost Topic Pages



    Recent Political Agenda Posts