
Our major sponsors
Sponsor of
Second Opinion
Sponsor of
Community Sketchbook
Our major advertisers
Our in-kind partners

MinnPost thanks these generous donors:
INDIVIDUALS AND FOUNDATI0NS
Blandin Foundation
Otto Bremer Foundation
Bush Foundation
Sage & John Cowles
David & Vicki Cox
Toby & Mae Dayton
Jack & Claire Dempsey
Ethics and Excellence in Journalism Foundation
Sam & Stacey Heins
John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
Joel & Laurie Kramer
Lee Lynch & Terry Saario
Martin & Brown Foundation
The McKnight Foundation
The Minneapolis Foundation
The Saint Paul Foundation
Rebecca & Mark Shavlik
(See all donors here.)
By Joe Kimball | Published Wed, May 27 2009 3:49 pm
Michael Ford, a St. Cloud lawyer who is president of the Minnesota State Bar Association, says U.S. Senate Republicans shouldn't block the Sonia Sotomayor's confirmation to the Supreme Court, according to the St. Cloud Times.
And Ford is a Republican who didn't vote for President Obama. Ford also has some concerns that Obama's Supreme Court nominee might favor the disadvantaged in legal issues rather than serve as a neutral umpire.
But he told the paper that bitter partisan fighting over court nominees has flawed Congress' role since Robert Bork was nominated but not confirmed to the Supreme Court.
"The concept of fighting tooth and nail over each federal judicial nominee has filtered down to the states, which has led directly to the current furor over the politicization of the state judiciary," Ford said.
Ford said he knew little about Sotomayor before her nomination Tuesday. What he's read about her since indicates she's capable of doing the work and should be confirmed, he said.
He also notes that the sitting president gets to pick who fills Supreme Court openings, and if Sotomayor ends up being the wrong person for the job Obama will pay the political price.
People have to accept that presidents "should do what they are hired to do," which is to make these types of key appointments with the Senate filling an "advise and consent" role rather than posturing along political lines, he told the paper.
"We ought to return the nomination process to that which I think the Founding Fathers originally intended," he said.
Like what you just read? Support high-quality journalism in Minnesota by becoming a member of MinnPost.
0 Comments:
Forgot Password? | Register to Comment
MinnPost does not permit the use of foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that may be libelous or interpreted as inciting hate or sexual harassment. User comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure that comments meet these standards and adhere to MinnPost's terms of use and privacy policy.
We intend for this area to be used by our readers as a place for civil, thought-provoking and high-quality public discussion. In order to achieve this, MinnPost requires that all commenters register and post comments with their actual names and place of residence. Register here to comment.