SERVING MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL / MINNESOTA

MinnPost thanks these major sponsors:


Sponsor of
Second Opinion



MinnPost thanks these generous donors of $25,000 or more:

MAJOR FOUNDATIONS

John S. and James L.
Knight Foundation
Blandin Foundation
McKnight Foundation
Minneapolis Foundation
Otto Bremer Foundation

INDIVIDUALS & FAMILY FOUNDATIONS
Sage & John Cowles
David & Vicki Cox
Toby & Mae Dayton
Sam & Stacey Heins
Joel & Laurie Kramer
Lee Lynch & Terry Saario
Martin & Brown
Foundation
(See all donors here.)

MinnPost.com Job Listing of the Day!
MinnPost.com Job Listing of the Day!

Browse
Minnesota Jobs
Direct from Company Websites!

Unadvertised,
Current,
Highest-quality

Start Searching Now!

POLITICAL AGENDA

  • Switch to Small Text Size
  • Switch to Medium Text Size
  • Switch to Large Text Size
Recommend to a friend Print Submit a Comment

    Coleman-Franken recount: Will law allow a look at disputed ballots?

    By Jay Weiner | Published Tue, Jun 23 2009 10:42 am

    As MinnPost colleague David Brauer reports in Daily Glean KSTP-TV has submitted Data Practices Act requests to counties statewide in hopes of examining, it seems, unopened ballots from the U.S. Senate race.

    We reported on this twice earlier this month when Republican activist Michael Brodkorb filed similar requests with a handful of counties. We noted the specific law that seems to prohibit opening ballots. We then had Brodkorb explaining his side.

    This Channel 5 request is directed at the counties, and not Secretary of State Mark Ritchie's office. So, the SOS folks have got no dog in this fight ... for now.Still, the feeling within Ritchie's office is that ballots can't be opened now and that voter privacy is an issue; besides those ballots are with the counties.

    The ballots are to be retained for 22 months and then can be destroyed, depending on each county's records retention policies.

    Still, wouldn't we all love to know what's inside those ballots ... even though election judges and reps on either side of the election rejected them and even though neither the Franken nor Coleman side was able to convince the three-judge election contest panel that these ballots were legally cast?

    That's the main point: Channel 5 or MinnPost could open these, but it could be totally irrelevant because the ballots were, in fact, rejected and not considered legal by a series of evaluations.

    Before it's over, expect Attorney General Lori Swanson's office to weigh in on these Data Practices Act requests.

    Like what you just read? Support high-quality journalism in Minnesota by becoming a member of MinnPost.

    Advertisement:

    1 Comments: Hide/Show Comments

    1 Comment: Hide/Show Comment

    0 Comments:

    E-mail address

    Password

     

    Forgot Password? | Register to Comment

    MinnPost does not permit the use of foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that may be libelous or interpreted as inciting hate or sexual harassment. User comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure that comments meet these standards and adhere to MinnPost's terms of use and privacy policy.

    We intend for this area to be used by our readers as a place for civil, thought-provoking and high-quality public discussion. In order to achieve this, MinnPost requires that all commenters register and post comments with their actual names and place of residence. Register here to comment.




    minnpost.com/politicalagenda



    Political Agenda is a place for quick-hit news about Minnesota's political scene and players. MinnPost's staff, including Joe Kimball and Doug Grow, will contribute items about local and state government, plus national political doings that have a Minnesota angle. Items will appear throughout the day, so check back often.

    Recent Political Agenda Posts