SERVING MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL / MINNESOTA
Donate Now Sustaining Member


Our major sponsors




Sponsor of
Second Opinion



Our major advertisers


Our in-kind partners


MinnPost thanks these generous donors:

INDIVIDUALS AND FOUNDATI0NS
Blandin Foundation
Otto Bremer Foundation
Bush Foundation
Sage & John Cowles
David & Vicki Cox
Toby & Mae Dayton
Jack & Claire Dempsey
Ethics and Excellence in Journalism Foundation
Sam & Stacey Heins
John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
Joel & Laurie Kramer
Lee Lynch & Terry Saario
Martin & Brown Foundation
The McKnight Foundation
The Minneapolis Foundation
The Saint Paul Foundation
Rebecca & Mark Shavlik

(See all donors here.)

POLITICAL AGENDA

  • Switch to Small Text Size
  • Switch to Medium Text Size
  • Switch to Large Text Size
Email Print Submit a Comment

    Duluth ruling on retiree health care will save city millions

    By Joe Kimball | Published Wed, Oct 14 2009 10:11 am

    A judge's ruling that Duluth can modify health care benefits for retirees will save $1 million the first year and $60 million to $100 million over the next 30 years, Duluth Mayor Don Ness said.

    The Duluth News Tribune notes that two city retirees and a retiree’s spouse had sued last year when the city proposed changing its retiree health care benefits. They had been getting free health care and asked the court to bar the city from reducing health-care benefits for city retirees and their dependents.

    But, the paper said, District Judge Kenneth Sandvik ruled Tuesday that the city may modify the retirees’ benefits whenever and however benefits for active employees are modified, because the collective bargaining agreements in effect on the retirees’ retirement dates don’t prohibit the city from doing so.

    “The plaintiffs’ health benefits are not fixed and governed by the plan in place on the dates of their retirements,” Sandvik wrote. “As former employees of the city, the retirees were aware, at the time of their respective retirement dates, that the city often modified the health-care benefits of active employees.’’

    Said the paper:

    Paula Savela, one of the plaintiffs, said she was very disappointed in the decision. “We’re going to appeal it,’’ she said. “As far as I know, that’s the plan.’’

    Greater Minnesota | Wed, Oct 14 2009 10:11 am | Comment

    Like what you just read? Support high-quality journalism in Minnesota by becoming a member of MinnPost.

    Advertisement:

    0 Comments:

    E-mail address

    Password

     

    Forgot Password? | Register to Comment

    MinnPost does not permit the use of foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that may be libelous or interpreted as inciting hate or sexual harassment. User comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure that comments meet these standards and adhere to MinnPost's terms of use and privacy policy.

    We intend for this area to be used by our readers as a place for civil, thought-provoking and high-quality public discussion. In order to achieve this, MinnPost requires that all commenters register and post comments with their actual names and place of residence. Register here to comment.




    minnpost.com/politicalagenda



    Political Agenda is a place for quick-hit news about Minnesota's political scene and players. MinnPost's staff, including Joe Kimball and Doug Grow, will contribute items about local and state government, plus national political doings that have a Minnesota angle. Items will appear throughout the day, so check back often.

    MinnPost Topic Pages



    Recent Political Agenda Posts