Skip to Content

Support MinnPost

MinnPost logo 2014 Summer Member Drive

Readers like you make MinnPost possible
Become a sustaining member today

Beyond McCain: Ron Paul's supporters hope to reshape the GOP

Ron Paul
REUTERS/Larry Downing
Ron Paul speaking at the American Conservative Union's 2008 Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington, D.C., earlier this year.

The GOP is the party of limited government. It's the party that touts fiscal responsibility. It claims to be the party of principle. The Minnesota Republican Party puts a premium on loyalty, yet it doesn't bind national convention delegates to its caucus presidential poll. So why is the state GOP being so hard on Ron Paul supporters with track records of supporting limited government, fiscal conservatism and loyal service to Republican candidates?

 
After Paul supporters won six of 12 delegate slots to the GOP national convention at Fourth, Fifth and Sixth District conventions in early April, GOP leadership expressed attitudes toward Paul supporters that ranged from dismissal to outright antagonism. But among rank and file conservative GOPers, there is a begrudging respect for the Paulites' quixotic quest to drag the Republican Party kicking and screaming back to its Goldwater/Reagan principles.

"We're telling our fellow Republicans that it's OK to defend the Constitution," said Minnesota state coordinator for Ron Paul, Marianne Stebbins. We're telling them it's OK to speak up against amnesty [for illegal immigrants]. We're even acknowledging that nation building might not be the best idea and that we should stick to defense, particularly that of our borders.

"We're not getting vast numbers to say 'get rid of the Federal Reserve,' but we are hearing more talk about 'sound money,'" she added.
 
Establishment vs. grass roots
Paul supporters captured two of three national delegate seats and all three alternate spots in the heavily conservative Sixth District. (Rep. Michele Bachmann, who has rock star appeal among conservatives, captured the third delegate spot).
 
"We knew they [Paul supporters] were coming and they were willing to lie, cheat and steal — maybe not steal, but they were willing to say anything," Sixth District Vice Chair Andy Aplikowski told the Star Tribune.

"They hijacked the convention," Jeff Johnson, Minnesota Senate District 15 co-chairman, told WorldNetDaily.
 
Following Paul's success at the GOP district conventions, Minnesota Republican Party Chairman Ron Carey said that the delegates' decision not to unite behind McCain only hurts the Republican Party.

Minnesota GOP communications director Mark Drake said: "I would just say that the nomination has been decided and John McCain is going to be the Republican on the ticket running against Senator Clinton or Obama. Ron Paul had his chance but didn't win."

Although the Republican nomination is not in doubt — Arizona Sen. John McCain has more than the requisite number of pledged delegates necessary to secure the GOP nomination — the Minnesota delegate drama threatens to hoist the state GOP on its own petard. Minnesota Republicans have talked the talk of grassroots activism and a bottom-up process. Will they walk the walk when Tweedledown doesn't agree with Tweedleup?
 
"Until the nomination is done [at the convention], we should continue debate," argues Stebbins. "Even if Ron Paul may not be the Republican nominee, it's still healthy for the party to debate the issues."
 
Principle vs. pragmatism
There are significant differences on campaign issues between Paul and McCain. Many are simply policy differences, not unlike those among the once-crowded GOP field vying for the nomination. Others, however, are nuanced by an appeal to principle rather than the pragmatism of appealing to polls and popular sentiment.
 
"Ron Paul's platform is the Constitution. McCain-Feingold [campaign finance reform] is a blow to political speech and the First Amendment," said Stebbins. "Ron Paul believes national defense includes defending our own borders. McCain-Kennedy [immigration reform] mocks the rule of law through amnesty and leaves our borders open and our defense vulnerable. Ron Paul believes in reducing the size and intrusiveness of government, reducing spending. McCain-Lieberman [climate stewardship] is a bloated invasion of bigger government. ... Ron Paul wants to return government to its proper role, [deferring power] back to the states."
 
While many in the conservative camp of the state GOP come down on the Paul side of the equation on immigration and fiscal issues, the big point of departure is Paul's unequivocal opposition to the war in Iraq. Paul was one of six Republicans voting against authorization of use of force in Iraq.

"My number one issue with the Ron Paul movement is it's anti-war/isolationism. I see no room for internal debate on where the party stands on that issue," said Aplikowski. "The Democratic Party is much more the home for the anti-war sentiment the Ron Paul people I have dealt with hold."

However, unlike many Democrats, including Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, who voted for authorization in the Senate, Paul's vote was not affected by statements about weapons of mass destruction. His support for U.S. withdrawal, unlike Clinton's position, isn't predicated on being somehow misled by the administration. Paul's position on Iraq is based on principles that many would argue are fundamentally conservative.
 
"Ron Paul argues that only Congress has the constitutional power to declare war," Stebbins said. "He believes preemptive war is a mistake and causes more security problems than it solves. If regime change is a legitimate reason to go to war, where do we stop?
 
"We have already been successful in reframing the debate in the GOP, at least to a degree," Stebbins added. "And there is still a debate. We're hearing that many grassroots party members are privately relieved that, in the wake of the election of Ron Paul delegates, we're not going quietly down that slippery slope to the left."
 
Some long-time GOP activists like Aplikowski, who have also criticized the GOP from the right, say the Paul people want to take over the party and expel anyone who disagrees with their libertarian social and foreign policy views.
 
"It is really a little annoying for some of us who not only have been trying to hold the party accountable, but also spent years building it up to have a bunch of strangers come in and throw us out with the bath water with misleading tactics," said Aplikowski.

'We are Republicans'

 Stebbins sees the Paul-inspired controversy between the party establishment and grassroots activists as a battle over power, not necessarily a conflict over issues or a conservative/libertarian split.
 
"There are Paul supporters working for [Sixth District Rep.] Michele Bachmann [Second District Rep.] John Kline and Barb Davis-White," GOP congressional candidate in the Fifth District, said Stebbins. "We are Republicans."

Stebbins has been heavily involved in the Republican Party for 16 years. Twice Stebbins chaired her district Basic Political Organizational Unit, the ongoing foundation of local Republican activity between election cycles. She ran for the state Senate as a Republican, and was a staffer on campaigns for Republicans Tad Jude and Gen Olson, a Young Republican National committeewoman and more. That's hardly the resume of an interloper into GOP politics. Among Paul supporters, Stebbins is the rule, not the exception.

Steve Rogers, who is a delegate to the national GOP convention from North Minneapolis, is a long-time Republican and a member of the Minneapolis Republican Committee. He's been a GOP ward and precinct chair. Attracted to Paul because he is a "principled" candidate, Rogers intends to support the party and remain active during the election.
 
"I have a number of concerns about John McCain, and I wish he would begin reaching out to conservatives to make me more comfortable about him," said Rogers. "As he is the presumptive nominee, I will grudgingly vote for him in November. I am a loyal Republican and very active in several conservative campaigns."
 
Kris Broberg, another national delegate and a Paul supporter, has been active in Republican politics for 18 years, serving on the Robbinsdale City Council and as a precinct chair in Minneapolis. He worked on campaigns for conservative Rod Grams. A Republican drawn to the party in the Reagan years, Broberg labels himself "100 percent Republican" but "99 percent sure he can't bring himself to vote for McCain."
 
"I don't think having John McCain as president advances the cause of the Republican Party — or the United States of America," Broberg said. "But I will be working hard on campaigns of several Republic candidates."

There are about 15 Paul supporters running as Republicans for various state and local positions, Stebbins said. Many Paul supporters, in Republican politics for the long haul, are actively involved in local Republican organizations.
 
'We all benefit'
 While the GOP leadership takes a dim view at best of pesky Paulites crashing the party, in the more free-wheeling blogosphere Republican faithful, even those disagreeing with some of Paul's positions, say Paul and his supporters have sent a wake-up call to GOP leadership.
 
Blogging at "Shot In the Dark," Mitch Berg called the Paul delegate coup a "teachable moment."  Reaction to the "Ronulans" reminded Berg of how irate some long-time GOP activists in the Sixth District were over  Bachmann's "tactics" when she garnered the nomination for Congress over state Reps. Jim Knobloch and Phil Krinkie and businessman Jay Esmay. "She got her people to go to caucuses and conventions and to vote for her," Berg wrote with mock sarcasm. "Let's give credit where credit is due; [Paul supporters] did conventions the way you're supposed to ... by organizing, by motivating and having their people show up."
 
At the Wright Country Republican blog, Drew Emmer summed up what might ultimately be the Paul effect: "The disproportionate reaction is what I would expect more likely from a lunatic democrat ... I don't agree with all Ron Paul's positions. But I do see the incredible contribution his grassroots organizing has made this year. He's a peculiar man ... that inspires conservative activism. That's a good thing. We all benefit."
 
Said Stebbins: "Paul's campaign may turn out like Goldwater's. Goldwater paved the way for Reagan. Paul may be paving the way for the next Reagan."
 
Craig Westover writes about politics and public affairs. He can be reached at westover4 [at] yahoo [dot] com.

Get MinnPost's top stories in your inbox

Related Tags:

Comments (9)

I find it extremely disturbing the the GOP leadership would want to exclude anyone from their party these days. With the abysmal primary turnout this season, it's obvious that the current GOP is losing this election before it even gets to the convention.

I, like millions of other Paul supporters, would infuse the party with new blood and enthusiasm, if only they would include us rather than treating us like party crashers.

Perhaps we should all just stay home in November. After McCain gets trounced, and the GOP is left wondering what to do now, they will be more receptive to our ideas, aka, the constitution.

I voted for Ron Paul in 1988 and I was very pleased to get to shake hands with him at a campaign rally in Las Vegas in January.

There were about 1000 enthusiastic supporters in attendance - I was impressed when they cheered his denunciation of fiat money. They're a much better educated group of supporters than the other candidates.

They would not have been bought off by the nonsensical promise of a summer gasoline tax holiday.

I have no idea even what the word "conservative" means any more after watching the Republicans spend money like drunken sailors.

The GOP is so infested with ex-democrats (neo-cons), only it’s demise can reverse it back to its original platform. This is obvious from this election season. Juan McWar is the Bob Dole of 08 - lets do something about it when we still have a chance - get behind Ron Paul and the r3VOLution.

my number one issue with this aplikowski guy is he re-enforces people to think down a one way never-ending road.

"My number one issue with the Ron Paul movement is it's anti-war/isolationism."

this is a fundamentally wrong statement made by people who do not have the ability to analyze situations and insist on an original plan that could have possibly be flawed. possibly. this has to end. i wish questioning and discussing issues would re-enter the mainstream and we could get rid of these jingoistic sheep who act like they are in different parties and talk about non issues.

I just completed reviewing the Minnesota GOP Platform 2006. I do hope the State GOP leadership re-reads the party platform prior to our state GOP convention. John McCain fails to comply with a majority of the platform, based on his campaign speeches and voting (what there is of it the last 2 years) record.

Ron Paul on the other hand falls in line with most every point of personal responsibility and individual freedom, including immigration. The sticking point is our endless undeclared war in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan along with soon to be Iran and the draft.

Ron Paul supports a CONGRESSIONAL DECLARED war under the United States Constitution not the United Nations. This position is part of Minnesota GOP platform.

The purpose of state elections and conventions is to provide national GOP direction from the perspective of 50 states. NOT THE NATIONAL GOP DICTATING to the states whom they will support.

McCain is not conservative by his own statements and voting record. Minnesota has a party platform to adhere to regardless of National GOP thought or strong-arming.

As a state delegate, I am voting Ron Paul. Principle, conviction, Minnesota party platform, reason, our constitution, and logic all demand I VOTE Ron Paul at Minnesota State Convention.

A story of this length that doesn't at least nod to the decades-long record of race problems among Paul and his top supporters is simply irresponsible. There's no other way to put it.

You're talking about a guy whose primary source of donations was, for years, a list they got from a Holocaust denial publication; a guy who doesn't believe in the Civil Rights Act of 1964; a guy who still has Klan members as field organizers; a guy who for 30 years had a publication writing vile racist screeds under his name.

To not acknowledge any of these facts in 1,600 words is just bad journalism.

Uh, Jeff, responsible journalists don't perpetrate garbage rumors. That's why that stuff isn't in this or other reputable publications.

ron paul appeared on cnn right after a lot of these rumors started and he did a terrific job defending himself. i recommend finding it. this is such an important video for people who are mislead.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=sY01Lpg5kqw

if the link doesn't go through... sY01Lpg5kqw is the ID for the video on youtube.

i have no idea what the "Civil Rights Act of 1964" is, i'm assuming equal rights for african americans. but ron paul would probably argue it isn't necessary because all the right in the constitution apply to the individual not a particular sex, gender, or color. jeff, please don't call people racist while explaining a fraction of their story.

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was necessary in granting Blacks the right to vote - a right they already had but was at the time being repressed by the Jim Crow laws of the South. It is probably the greatest legislative victory of the Civil Rights Movement, and is necessary in understanding the Black struggle and American history in general. Please people, look this stuff up - it's pretty damn important.

Jeff is taking a fair stab by addressing the issue. And let me point out that he never called Ron Paul racist, he just acknowledged the racial troubles that have haunted Paul.