Walz bill would ban earmarks to for-profit corporations
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Rep. Tim Walz cosponsored a bill today that would ban congressional earmarks to for-profit corporations.
“No-bid contracts aren’t good for the taxpayer,” Walz said in a statement. “Earmarks to for-profit companies act like no-bid contracts and that’s not something I can support.”
The issue is a big one for watchdog groups like the Sunlight Foundation.
Bill Allison, a senior fellow at the foundation, uses earmarked funding for health research as an example. In the normal process, researchers have to submit a proposal to a government agency like the National Institutes of Health. That proposal then goes through a rigorous peer review process, which is the scientific equivalent of competitive bidding.
The current earmark system circumvents this process, directing federal dollars to researchers or companies that a lawmaker or their staff deems worthy.
“You have them making decisions that are way beyond their level of expertise or the expertise of the staff... That just isn't a good way to spend money," Allison told MinnPost in March. "Even if those programs are good, we are potentially missing out."
More like this
- Battle over earmarks: House Republicans making a 'strategic calculation'
- Minnesota's earmark requests: Where the money is going
- ALEC and corporate fingerprints are all over national push for online learning
- Rep. John Kline worries new rules will hurt for-profit colleges
- State attorney general joins lawsuit against for-profit colleges
Most Commented