Skip to Content

With long-term $6.2 billion deficit facing state, GOP legislators say they’ll get to work on budget cuts

In a way, the new Republican majority in the Legislature couldn't have written a better script for today's much awaited and much dreaded economic forecast.

Short term, not so bad; a small surplus through June, in fact.

But for the next two-year cycle, the economists say the budget sky is falling. Again.

They're projecting a $6.2 billion deficit for fiscal years 2012-13. (All the projections and background material are available on the Minnesota Management and Budget Department website.)

Steve Sviggum
Steve Sviggum

And major structural problems in the budget doom the state to further deficits down the road, said Steve Sviggum, the new MMB commissioner, at today's briefing.

Drastic action is needed, Sviggum and the state's other forecasters said.


Republicans repeat calls for cuts
That call reinforces what the Republican lawmakers campaigned for in their successful take-over of the Legislature — spending cuts. Living within our means is their oft-repeated mantra.

Not that anyone would ever wish for so much red ink on the state's ledgers, but this scenario does provide additional ammunition to the Republicans, who claim that state spending is out of control and needs some long-term solutions.

"This reaffirms what the voters told us — spend within your means," said Rep. Kurt Zellers, the incoming House speaker.

"We're going to do as Minnesota families and business owners are doing: live within our means and not go back to the taxpayers and ask for more money," he said.

Another plus for Republicans — the current small surplus of about $400 million in the current biennium's budget, which runs through June — means Pawlenty won't have to make another round of unpopular unallotments to bring the current budget into balance. And the new majorities won't have to tackle end-of-fiscal-year problems right away, as they're acclimating to their new roles and getting up to speed on logistics.

DFL, Dayton quick to react
Today's news elicited the much-used DFL response from Sen. Tom Bakk, the outgoing Senate Tax Committee chairman: Sure, Minnesota families make cuts and sacrifices in hard times, but sometimes they have to go out and get a second job.

Bakk was part of the DFL team responding to the forecast. And he predicted that the state will, somehow, have to bring in some new revenue to solve the long-term problem.

"We need real solutions that will focus on the middle-class families that are suffering in this economy," Bakk said.

Paul Thissen, the new House minority leader, said the DFLers in the House are looking forward to working with Republicans, as they "turn from campaign rhetoric to the reality of governing."

And he said he will not accept any budget proposals that favor large corporate interests over middle-class families.

Republican lawmakers said they will make it a priority to protect children, nursing homes and people who are disabled while making their cuts. Zellers said another priority is making sure Minnesotans are safe and secure.

DFLer Thissen, though, said he fears that balancing the budgets will mean nursing homes closing, people with disabilities not getting services, more schools going to four-day weeks and colleges making large tuition increases.

Responding moments ago to the forecast, Mark Dayton said the projected deficit, which is $593 million worse than the previous forecast, makes it extremely important for the governor recount process to be completed in time for him to take office, as scheduled, on Jan. 3, and get started on the budget fix.

He said he has no specific proposals for cuts yet, but that an increased tax on high-income earners — which he pushed during the campaign — will be in his proposed budget, even though it's been rejected by Republican legislators.

Dayton said if the recount works out as expected, he and the Legislature will face the "very difficult task" of fixing a shortfall that equals about 19 percent of the state's projected biennial budget.

Gov. Tim Pawlenty "left us in a terrible situation," he said.

Pawlenty touts fiscal accomplishments
The governor, not surprising, saw things differently.

Today's short-term forecast led the governor to send out a press release headlined: "Pawlenty Ends Term With Budget Surplus."

In a statement that should look good on a presidential candidate's resume, the governor said:

"Our plan to control government spending, stop tax increases and support private sector economic development has worked Every budget during my time in office has been balanced, we leave with money in the bank and one of the lowest unemployment rates in the nation. If government lives within its means, the next budget is manageable."

But even Republican legislators acknowledged that much of the recent budget solutions have involved so-called one-time initiatives, such as the federal stimulus funds and K-12 funding shifts that delay payments to school districts.

And those may not be there for future fixes.

New Senate Majority Leader Amy Koch said: "We're ready to make a lot of tough decisions [on spending cuts]. That one-time money, the shifts, won't be available to us."

As to which cuts might be made,  Zellers said "it's premature to talk about specifics at this point."

He did say that the possibility of cutting corporate state taxes as a way to stimulate job creation will be on the table.

No quick fix foreseen
State Economist Tom Stinson says the state's economy won't get appreciably better for two years. And there's no inflation figured into the state forecast, which, on paper, saves about $1 billion.

Looking ahead to continued problems, Pawlenty also proposed today that the state adopt a new constitutional amendment that would limit state spending to the amount of revenue actually taken in by the state in the previous budget period.

He'd like Minnesotans to vote on this wording:

Shall the Minnesota Constitution be amended to require that state government general fund expenditures be limited to the amount of actual general fund revenues received by the state in the previous two-year budget period?

He'd include a provision allowing for additional expenditures to provide for the public peace, safety, or health in the event of a declared national security or peacetime emergency.

Comments (10)

OMG is Pawlenty for real? He really wants us to believe he has left us in good financial shape? He has kicked the debt can down the road with smoke and mirrors since 2004. This guy wants to run for president, give us a break. He wouldn't carry Minnesota for crying out loud!

Sen. Tom Bakk, suggests the legislature needs more money to spend, and that if the taxpayers don't have it handy, we're just going to have to go out and get a second job.

Meanwhile, Mark Dayton claims that the surplus Governor Pawlenty's fiscal prudence is leaving the next legislature amounts to a "terrible situation".

Say, lefty's?

You're kidding; you kid....right?

Say you have a 2012-13 general fund budget of $38.5 billion and you want to reduce that to $32.3 billion. You've promised to hold K-12 education "harmless" presumably by holding spending to 2010-11 amounts of $13.3 billion. Since we accepted the Medicaid (medical assistance) stimulus money, we're required to do ”maintenance of effort." Per the forcast, medical assistance is 75 percent of the $11.9 billion health and human services budget, or $8.9 billion. Hold Public Safety harmless, another $1.8 billion. 13.3 + 8.9 + 1.8 = $24 billion off the table. So you'll need to cut the $6.2 from the remaining $14.5 (42%) from the remaining budget to balance the budget with just cuts. The remainder is a little Health and Human Services, debt service, local aids and credits, and all other (roads, parks, bridges?). Interesting math.

The Republicans will have to cut taxes very harshly to generate enough new revenue to balance the budget.

"He said he has no specific proposals for cuts yet"
Governor Dayton, you might want to get on that since your budget is due in about two months.

"And he said he will not accept any budget proposals that favor large corporate interests over middle-class families."
House Minority Leader Thissen, you might want to get used to the idea that what you find unacceptable doesn't matter.

Well, yes and no to #2. If there is, indeed, a $400 million “surplus,” I wonder how much of that amount consists of money the state should have turned over to school districts, for example, but didn’t.

$6.2 billion sounds to me like a hole in everyone’s wallet, and if the burden isn’t equitably distributed, there’s going to be some ‘splainin’ to do. Feel free to call it fiscal prudence, or even strawberry shortcake if you like, but paying your bills by spending the money in the college savings accounts of your children doesn’t strike me as either honest or prudent. “Unallotment” of state funds to school districts seems to me to be exactly that.

I don’t think financial genius is required to see that both cuts and tax increases are likely to be necessary to “fix” things in the short term, and then the hard work really begins. What kind of state and society do Minnesotans want? How will we get there? How will we pay for it?

Mr. Pawlenty’s constitutional proposal is a thinly-disguised variation on the TABOR Amendment in Colorado, which has had disastrous consequences at virtually every level – local, county, region, and the state as a whole. Maybe it would work here, but I’m more than a little skeptical, and once something is in the constitution, it’s VERY difficult to remove it if it proves to be a mistake.

Meanwhile, Mr. Zellers’ meanderings about cutting corporate state taxes will surely fatten Republican campaign coffers, but we already have ample evidence that tax policies have very little to do with creating jobs. Jobs get created when there’s demand for a product and income with which to buy it. Taxes are a small part of the financial picture for any sizable corporation – wages are a much larger segment. In that context, it’s useful to remember the example currently being set by Polaris, Inc., as it moves 500 non-union manufacturing jobs from Osceola, WI, to Mexico – not because of taxes, but because they can pay Mexican workers 1/3 of what their American counterparts – soon to be unemployed – were making.

And while I don’t qualify as “scary-smart,” I like to think I am from the reality-based community, and in that regard, I can only nod my head in sad agreement with Tom Anderson’s second comment (#5). Lately, at least, Republicans are interested in “bipartisan” or “nonpartisan” only when they’re in the minority, and that’s no longer the case in the legislature.

A reminder:
Much of the budget deficit is due to tax cuts in the early oughts; a good chunk of the rest to the drooping economy.
More tax and spending cuts simply siphons more money out of the economy and makes the deficit worse.

"The Davis Money Plan" is the only sensible way to balance Minnesota's budget. Check it out with an open mind.
Leslie Davis 612/529-5253

"The Davis Money Plan"
• Balanced budget
• Protected environment
• Create thousands of jobs & incomes
• Cut fuel and axle taxes in half
• Build and maintain safe roads and bridges

1. FACT - Banks do not lend depositor's money. They create new electronic digit money for loans.

2. PLAN - Modify by law "POWERS OF MINNESOTA STATE CHARTERED BANKS".

3. The "modification" will require state-chartered banks to create debt-free money for the construction and maintenance of all public roads and bridges.

4. Today, when state-chartered banks make loans they simply create the money as electronic bookkeeping entries. The money is just numbers in their computers. When you write a check or use your ATM card you put those numbers (money) into circulation and the money can then move freely through the economy.

5. Banks will create money for Davis Plan roads and bridges by making electronic bookkeeping entries in their computers, just like they do now when they make loans. Except THIS IS NOT A LOAN but a final debt-free payment for approved production and does not have to be paid back to anyone.

6. Half of the fuel, axle and registration taxes will be eliminated and half will be used to balance the state budget and reduce some property taxes.

7. Individuals and businesses will save billions of dollars.

8. "The Davis Money Plan" creates demand for products, services and thousands of high-paying jobs. It provides desperately needed incomes, the cash flow Minnesota’s stagnant economy badly needs, and safe, state-of-the-art roads and bridges, and sustainable prosperity.

Pawlenty's proposed constitutional amendment would be a dream come true for all the anti-tax members of future legislatures and administration BECAUSE all they'd have to do is cut cut cut revenue and then make matching cuts to health and human services, infrastructure, education and all other "wasteful spending on special interest groups" (you know, groups of poor people, homeless and/or mentally ill people, people with disabilities, elderly people and all the other special interest groups seeking "handouts").

In other words, it would legitimize the Pawlenty method of governance. Sad. Very sad.

Dollars are abstracts, pain and suffering is not. If cuts are to be made, let us not require the pain and suffering of the poor to be increased as the result. I would far rather see my state income tax go up, than know that greed has caused the life of an innocent to be lost.
This is especially true in our current economic times, when the wants of many have been severely increased. If cuts can be made make them, but do not read those cuts as mere dollar signs.