Skip to Content

With Brodkorb gone, new GOP Senate style emerges

Michael Brodkorb
MinnPost photo by Terry Gydesen
David Strom: "I've been concerned on the one hand that Michael [Brodkorb] was too aggressive, too partisan; now they’ve gone to the other extreme."

The dust-up over the state Senate Republicans’ distribution of pamphlets at caucuses, while not Watergate, has allowed the DFL to draw the first blood of the legislative session and shows the plusses and minuses of the Senate’s new communications style.  

Both Senate Majority Leader Dave Senjem and Communications Director Steve Sviggum acknowledged that Republicans had made a mistake when they included on the fliers a link to a campaign website. Sviggum apologized. In so doing, they opened the door for attack. Minority Leader Tom Bakk and the DFL Party followed immediately with a formal complaint with the state Office of Administrative Hearings.

“The whole direction that they have taken opens themselves up” said Republican consultant David Strom.  “Any lawyer would say – you don’t immediately say you’re sorry – you eliminate all protection and you may in fact have a defensible position. It’s your job to protect yourselves. It’s other people’s job to take you apart.” 

Their reaction differs widely from the style of former communications director Michael Brodkorb. “I’ve been concerned on the one hand that Michael was too aggressive, too partisan; now they’ve gone to the other extreme,” Strom said.

Furthermore, say Strom and other Republicans, the flier without the offending link was a proper piece of communication. Minnesota Senate policy allows communicating with voters and does not forbid specifically partisan language.  It does forbid the use of Senate resources for campaign purposes, the error that Senjem admitted.

Laudable approach

John Wodele, the communications director for Gov. Jesse Ventura who worked with both Senjem and Sviggum, finds the new approach laudable.

“Their communication style has taken on the character of their leader – Senjem is a thoughtful, deliberate man,” he said. “The style is encouraging and appropriate. I think the public will appreciate it.” 

That is, if the public is really concerned. Both Wodele and Strom view “pamphlet-gate” as a distraction, an arcane issue that’s been elevated to public status. “It’s part of a larger problem all over the Legislature,” Strom said. “ People begin to think that the public cares way more than it does about what happens there. The Legislature is not the center of gravity.”

But will the Legislature be the battleground for a potential shift of power in the November elections when even small mistakes will be used as political weapons? The 15 Republican senators who distributed the fliers at their caucuses were named in the DFL complaint, creating the opportunity for damaging campaign charges from the opposition.

It’s already clear that the DFL intends to use the Senate’s tumultuous change of leadership as an election argument. It’s “one scandal after another,” said DFL Party Chair Ken Martin in a statement about the flier distribution.

GOP leaders “are making themselves look like they’re completely ham-handed,” said Strom who, like Wodele, generally admires the leadership and skills that Senjem and Sviggum bring to the caucus.

They should put those skills to greater use, he said. “Start focusing on things that Minnesota cares about,” he said. “They need to get in to the business of moving forward.”

Related Tags:

Comments (7)

The other extreme?

Not hardly. It really rells you something when a minimal demonstration of some integrity gets classified as an "extreme" swing of some kind. No wonder you can't have a reasonable conversation with these people. Bakk would have attacked them, and rightly so, no matter regardless.

If they are to be a welcome

If they are to be a welcome change, why does it seem that their first few weeks are characterized by over-reach and misstatements?

Sviggum and the UofMN. Printing with public money donation solicitations. Disproportionate cuts of staffing levels. Hearing disputes.

It helps when you don't treat the other party like a personal enemy.

Sure

The Republicans have been just too darn cooperative. Just a nice bunch of fellas. Great taling point. Too bad reality does not even come close.

Cut slack now

“The whole direction that they have taken opens themselves up” said Republican consultant David Strom. “Any lawyer would say – you don’t immediately say you’re sorry – you eliminate all protection and you may in fact have a defensible position. It’s your job to protect yourselves. It’s other people’s job to take you apart.”

This illustrates perfectly one of the key problems with Republican strategy.

The Republicans did something wrong. Senjem and Sviggum owned it, at least partially.

That is one of the greatest strides in the sad and sorry history of the Minnesota legislature in the past several years.

Now a Republican soothsayer counsels that it was wrong of them to confess to misdoing, because the traditional way is to deny, deny, deny, forcing the Democrats to try to make accusations stick, and ergo, we're off to the uncivil wars again.

Mr. Strom, your advice stinks. Just sayin'.

New Senate GOP Style?

There's a new Senate GOP style? That's funny. It looks just like the old style. Take, for example, Senjem saying he doesn't know if any of his caucus members are members of ALEC. That's not believable. Just like the old Senate leadership, this one cannot be trusted to tell the truth, to offer any transparency whatsoever, or to listen to opposing views. Maybe you mean that this Majority Leader wears glasses and the last one did not. Now that's a change.

"...the leadership and skills that Senjem and Sviggum bring…"

"...the leadership and skills that Senjem and Sviggum bring…"

That was sarcasm, right? Senjem's first act was to slash the DFL caucus budget while leaving the GOP budget untouched, a move guaranteed to inflame, and an issue still unresolved.

Next, he hired Sviggum at an exorbitant salary, for no obvious reason except that it would dramatically boost the level of Sviggum's eventual state pension checks. Then, he supervised the Senate lynching of highly qualified Dayton PUC nominee Ellen Anderson.

After that, Senjem absurdly pushed as "jobs bills" the ALEC-written Insurance-Company-Get-Out-of-Jail-Free bills, which the Governor quickly vetoed. Following that, he okayed creating and printing GOP campaign literature at taxpayer expense, an illegal act that Mr Sviggum admits, notwithstanding Mr Strom's uneducated guess to the contrary.

And all along the way, Senator Senjem has stage managed the governance of the state by contention and constitutional amendment, pushing the hottest hot button issues, such as same sex marriage and voter intimidation, out of the legislative process and into the realm of public squabble.

This last abandonment of responsibility, refusing to do the hard work of legislating, drives higher the high levels of public contentiousness, distracts from real issues with the possibility of consensus solutions, and wastes vast amounts of money on hot and angry media campaigns, money that could be better spent on almost anything else, all for the questionable benefit of turning out two angry party bases in November.

David Senjem's record to date is "leadership" at its worst. Spare us please, Mr Wodele and Mr Strom, if this is the concept of "leadership and skills" that you would foist upon us.

It's thinking like Strom's

that is the problem. OK, take a minute to consider what you've done and whether it was wrong. Then act accordingly, which is what Sviggum and Senjum did in this case.