SERVING MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL / MINNESOTA
Donate Now Sustaining Member

MinnPost thanks these major sponsors:




Sponsor of
Second Opinion



Our major advertisers


Our in-kind partners


MinnPost thanks these generous donors:

INDIVIDUALS AND FOUNDATI0NS
Blandin Foundation
Otto Bremer Foundation
Bush Foundation
Sage & John Cowles
David & Vicki Cox
Toby & Mae Dayton
Jack & Claire Dempsey
Ethics and Excellence in Journalism Foundation
Sam & Stacey Heins
John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
Joel & Laurie Kramer
Lee Lynch & Terry Saario
Martin & Brown Foundation
The McKnight Foundation
The Minneapolis Foundation
The Saint Paul Foundation
Rebecca & Mark Shavlik

(See all donors here.)

From Inside Science News Service, Christian Science Monitor
and MinnPost journalist Sharon Schmickle
  • Switch to Small Text Size
  • Switch to Medium Text Size
  • Switch to Large Text Size
Email Print Submit a Comment

    Pros and cons of biofuel production

    By Jim Dawson | Published Mon, Sep 21 2009 5:30 am

    Every spring and summer, a "dead zone" of oxygen-poor waters the size of Massachusetts forms in the Gulf of Mexico. Fish, crab and shrimp catches decrease in these hypoxic waters, which lose oxygen due to massive algal blooms triggered by fertilizer runoff.

    The zone has existed for at least 50 years, and the Environmental Protection Agency has set goals to shrink this massive zone. Recent federal mandates to grow more biofuels in the agricultural region that drains into the Mississippi River basin promise to hinder those efforts, according to a new report.

    Researchers from the Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh concluded that "meeting the biofuel goals set forth [by the federal government] will likely increase the occurrence of hypoxia ... regardless of the selection of crops."

    Some biofuel advocates had suggested that growing switchgrass and other biofuel crops that need less fertilizer than corn and soybeans would help reduce the nitrate pollution. The scientists said the change to more cellulose-based crops could cut nitrate runoff by as much as 20 percent, but that is not enough to meet EPA runoff targets intended to reduce the size of the dead zone.

    The scientists advocate aggressive nutrient management that includes wetland construction, vegetative buffers, tillage management and precision fertilizer application.

    "Only when all the nitrogen runoff associated with the production of corn, soy, and switchgrass is reduced will the EPA goal be met," the study said. The report will appear in the October issue of the journal Environmental Science and Technology.

    Jim Dawson reports for Inside Science News Service, which is supported by the American Institute of Physics, a not-for-profit publisher of scientific journals.

    Like what you just read? Support high-quality journalism in Minnesota by becoming a member of MinnPost.

    Advertisement:

    1 Comment: Hide/Show Comment

    E-mail address

    Password

     

    Forgot Password? | Register to Comment

    MinnPost does not permit the use of foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that may be libelous or interpreted as inciting hate or sexual harassment. User comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure that comments meet these standards and adhere to MinnPost's terms of use and privacy policy.

    We intend for this area to be used by our readers as a place for civil, thought-provoking and high-quality public discussion. In order to achieve this, MinnPost requires that all commenters register and post comments with their actual names and place of residence. Register here to comment.



    minnpost.com/scientificagenda



    Scientific Agenda reports on important and interesting developments from the world of science in Minnesota and elsewhere. Coverage includes reports from MinnPost journalist Sharon Schmickle, who has won many awards for her science journalism. She has also taken part in several science fellowships, including the Templeton-Cambridge Journalism Fellowship at Cambridge University in England, the Knight Science Journalism program at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a Latin American fellowship sponsored by the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing Inc. in New York.




    Scientific Agenda also features material from other sources, including Inside Science News Service, a Washington, D.C.-based news service, which is supported by the not-for-profit American Institute of Physics, a publisher of scientific journals.

    Recent Scientific Agenda posts