SERVING MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL / MINNESOTA
Donate Now Sustaining Member

MinnPost thanks these major sponsors:




Sponsor of
Second Opinion



Our major advertisers


Our in-kind partners


MinnPost thanks these generous donors:

INDIVIDUALS AND FOUNDATI0NS
Blandin Foundation
Otto Bremer Foundation
Bush Foundation
Sage & John Cowles
David & Vicki Cox
Toby & Mae Dayton
Jack & Claire Dempsey
Ethics and Excellence in Journalism Foundation
Sam & Stacey Heins
John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
Joel & Laurie Kramer
Lee Lynch & Terry Saario
Martin & Brown Foundation
The McKnight Foundation
The Minneapolis Foundation
The Saint Paul Foundation
Rebecca & Mark Shavlik

(See all donors here.)

From Inside Science News Service, Christian Science Monitor
and MinnPost journalist Sharon Schmickle
  • Switch to Small Text Size
  • Switch to Medium Text Size
  • Switch to Large Text Size
Email Print Submit a Comment

    Stem cells: Ready or not?

    By Sharon Schmickle | Published Wed, Sep 23 2009 3:02 pm

    Two items in the news this week show where we are right now with respect to tapping the immense potential for stem cell therapies.

    Item one illustrates the enormous hope held by so many people around the world. Patients with incurable diseases are increasingly travelling thousands of miles for expensive, but risky and unproven stem-cell procedures, Nature News reported.

    Profit-driven practitioners advertise services directly to clients and are increasingly organized into international networks, Nature said. Though Hungary, China, India, Thailand and other countries have moved to crack down on the practices, many black-market clinics are thriving.

    The United States has set rules for testing and clinical application of stem cells. But “numerous US-based companies circumvent this law by recruiting patients to cooperative hospitals in other countries,” Nature said. Other companies are openly fighting the regulations in courts and also taking their arguments directly to patients.

    Nature comes down on the governments’ side of the debates: “The enforcement of rules in countries where they already exist must be viewed as a necessary safeguard to prevent missteps and tragedies of the kind that have so often occurred when medicine is based on faith and hope in advance of evidence.”

    Item two illustrates the many painstaking steps yet to be taken on the road to actually deploying reliable therapies. While scientists test the effectiveness and safety of various therapies, they still are groping for effective ways to deliver these seemingly magical cells where they are needed in our bodies.

    Snorting them? Yep, that’s one approach reported by William Frey, a University of Minnesota professor of pharmaceutics and his colleagues.

    The researchers had mice sniff tiny droplets containing adult stem cells from rats. An hour later, rat stem cells were clearly visible in the mice’s brains. To make sure the ability to penetrate the brain wasn’t limited just to those cells, they also had rats snort a second type of cells, from human brain tumors. These cells also penetrated the brain within an hour.

    It’s a noteworthy stride with potential for treating a range of brain disorders from stroke to Alzheimer’s disease. But it’s one stride. The Food and Drug Administration has yet to approve any stem cell-based therapies for the brain. And the researchers have many puzzles to solve: How long do snorted stem cells remain in the brain? Would the “intranasal” delivery work to actually treat a diseased animal -- and, eventually, a diseased human?  Do the snorted cells cause inflammations? Infections? Immune responses?

    You get the idea. This is a long, slow, intricate process.

    Like what you just read? Support high-quality journalism in Minnesota by becoming a member of MinnPost.

    Advertisement:

    0 Comments:

    E-mail address

    Password

     

    Forgot Password? | Register to Comment

    MinnPost does not permit the use of foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that may be libelous or interpreted as inciting hate or sexual harassment. User comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure that comments meet these standards and adhere to MinnPost's terms of use and privacy policy.

    We intend for this area to be used by our readers as a place for civil, thought-provoking and high-quality public discussion. In order to achieve this, MinnPost requires that all commenters register and post comments with their actual names and place of residence. Register here to comment.



    minnpost.com/scientificagenda



    Scientific Agenda reports on important and interesting developments from the world of science in Minnesota and elsewhere. Coverage includes reports from MinnPost journalist Sharon Schmickle, who has won many awards for her science journalism. She has also taken part in several science fellowships, including the Templeton-Cambridge Journalism Fellowship at Cambridge University in England, the Knight Science Journalism program at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a Latin American fellowship sponsored by the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing Inc. in New York.




    Scientific Agenda also features material from other sources, including Inside Science News Service, a Washington, D.C.-based news service, which is supported by the not-for-profit American Institute of Physics, a publisher of scientific journals.

    Recent Scientific Agenda posts