SERVING MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL / MINNESOTA

MinnPost.com Job Listing of the Day!
MinnPost.com Job Listing of the Day!

Browse
Minnesota Jobs
Direct from Company Websites!

Unadvertised,
Current,
Highest-quality

Start Searching Now!

 





 

From Inside Science News Service
and MinnPost journalist Sharon Schmickle
  • Switch to Small Text Size
  • Switch to Medium Text Size
  • Switch to Large Text Size
Recommend to a friend Print Submit a Comment

    Pew survey finds decline in public's belief that global warming is real

    By Sharon Schmickle | Published Wed, Nov 4 2009 9:35 am

    Just before Congress began tackling climate change legislation this week, the Pew Research Center released a new survey showing a sharp decline in public’s belief that global warming is real.

    Two years ago, 77 percent of Americans who were polled said there was solid evidence of global warming. Last year 71 percent said so. Now it is 57 percent.

    Pew noted that its poll was released a day after leaders of 18 prominent scientific organizations signed a “Dear Senator” letter reaffirming what they see as scientific consensus on climate change. (One of the 18 signers is University of Minnesota Prof. Douglas Arnold, who is president this year of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.)

    Why are the public and the scientists moving in opposite directions on this issue?

    I don’t know. And Pew researchers said they were puzzled too.

    One hint, though, comes from a different study Pew released last month. This one was a News IQ quiz.

    Here’s one of the 12 multiple choice questions on the quiz: Does the so-called “cap and trade” legislation being discussed in Congress deal with 1) banking reform, 2) energy and environment, 3) health care or 4) unemployment?

    The overall news IQ was pretty low. The answers to this question, though, were near the lowest of the low. Only 23 percent of those who took the quiz chose the correct answer, which is No. 2, energy and the environment.

    To be sure, reasonable people could disagree with cap-and-trade proposals circulating on Capitol Hill. That question wasn’t asked. Busy people also could be forgiven for not knowing the considerable intricacies of those proposals. But not knowing so much as their general gist?  

    Something other than scientific argument and news coverage of the public policy issues is turning public opinion to quite a remarkable degree.

    Any clues anyone?

    Like what you just read? Support high-quality journalism in Minnesota by becoming a member of MinnPost.

    Advertisement:

    6 Comments: Hide/Show Comments

    6 Comment: Hide/Show Comment

    0 Comments:

    E-mail address

    Password

     

    Forgot Password? | Register to Comment

    MinnPost does not permit the use of foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that may be libelous or interpreted as inciting hate or sexual harassment. User comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure that comments meet these standards and adhere to MinnPost's terms of use and privacy policy.

    We intend for this area to be used by our readers as a place for civil, thought-provoking and high-quality public discussion. In order to achieve this, MinnPost requires that all commenters register and post comments with their actual names and place of residence. Register here to comment.



    minnpost.com/scientificagenda



    Scientific Agenda reports on important and interesting developments from the world of science in Minnesota and elsewhere. Coverage includes reports from MinnPost journalist Sharon Schmickle, who has won many awards for her science journalism. She has also taken part in several science fellowships, including the Templeton-Cambridge Journalism Fellowship at Cambridge University in England, the Knight Science Journalism program at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a Latin American fellowship sponsored by the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing Inc. in New York.




    Scientific Agenda also features material from other sources, including Inside Science News Service, a Washington, D.C.-based news service, which is supported by the not-for-profit American Institute of Physics, a publisher of scientific journals.

    Recent Scientific Agenda posts