SERVING MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL / MINNESOTA
Donate Now Sustaining Member

MinnPost thanks these major sponsors:




Sponsor of
Second Opinion



Our major advertisers


Our in-kind partners


MinnPost thanks these generous donors:

INDIVIDUALS AND FOUNDATI0NS
Blandin Foundation
Otto Bremer Foundation
Bush Foundation
Sage & John Cowles
David & Vicki Cox
Toby & Mae Dayton
Jack & Claire Dempsey
Ethics and Excellence in Journalism Foundation
Sam & Stacey Heins
John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
Joel & Laurie Kramer
Lee Lynch & Terry Saario
Martin & Brown Foundation
The McKnight Foundation
The Minneapolis Foundation
The Saint Paul Foundation
Rebecca & Mark Shavlik

(See all donors here.)

From Inside Science News Service, Christian Science Monitor
and MinnPost journalist Sharon Schmickle
  • Switch to Small Text Size
  • Switch to Medium Text Size
  • Switch to Large Text Size
Email Print Submit a Comment

    U.S. scientist travels North Korea, where he held a lump of plutonium

    By Phillip F. Schewe | Published Thu, Feb 25 2010 6:01 am

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Siegfried Hecker, sitting in a cold conference room, was asked by his North Korean hosts if he would like to see their "product."  "Yes," Dr. Hecker replied. "Do you mean plutonium?"

    Hecker, former director of the U.S. weapons lab at Los Alamos and familiar with the hazardous properties of plutonium, was surprised when two technicians carried a small red metal box into the room. Inside was a white wooden box containing two glass jars -- they looked like marmalade jars -- one containing a piece of plutonium metal, the other plutonium powder. He later asked if he could hold the jar with the metal. Only then was he pretty sure it was plutonium, because of its heaviness and because it was warm.
     
    The warmth came from the radioactive rays emitted by plutonium.  Fortunately, the rays were weak enough to be harmless, but the metal is potentially deadly if ingested or inhaled. And, of course, plutonium is particularly deadly when it powers a nuclear bomb, as it did in the nuclear explosion that obliterated Nagasaki during World War II.

    The threshold for being considered a nuclear power pretty much means that a country must possess enough plutonium, about 13 pounds, to make a nuclear bomb. This dangerous element takes its name from Pluto, the god of the underworld.
     
    Hecker has been to North Korea six times. On his first visit, in 2004, he was handed the sample of plutonium, he believes, because the North Koreans wanted to impress upon the United States the seriousness of their nuclear efforts. Even though at that time he was no longer Los Alamos director, Hecker was an acknowledged expert on plutonium, and would be sure to recognize what the North Koreans had done.

    Hecker described his Korean journeys in February at a meeting of the American Physical Society in Washington, D.C.  

    Another important part of his nuclear diplomacy, mostly carried out as Los Alamos employee or Stanford professor, was his numerous trips to Russia, 41 all together. He was one of the first Western scientists to be allowed into the most secret of Soviet nuclear sites.
     
    Even though you're probably not aware of it, Hecker’s efforts have had a subtle impact on your life. He helped establish a program involving Russian and Western scientists, who cooperated to dismantle Russian nuclear weapons and to account for tons of fissionable material — plutonium and uranium — parked at many sites around the former Soviet Union. One consequence of this program was to bring a lot of uranium from Russia to the United States. In fact, about half the uranium now used to make electricity in U.S. reactors comes from Russia. In other words, about 10 percent of the electricity going through your computer right now was once part of the Soviet nuclear weapons complex.

    Last month Hecker received the Enrico Fermi Award, the highest award given by the U.S. Department of Energy. He was recognized for his research on plutonium and for his efforts to reduce the danger of nuclear weapons.

    Phillip F. Schewe reports for Inside Science News Service.

    Like what you just read? Support high-quality journalism in Minnesota by becoming a member of MinnPost.

    Advertisement:

    0 Comments:

    E-mail address

    Password

     

    Forgot Password? | Register to Comment

    MinnPost does not permit the use of foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that may be libelous or interpreted as inciting hate or sexual harassment. User comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure that comments meet these standards and adhere to MinnPost's terms of use and privacy policy.

    We intend for this area to be used by our readers as a place for civil, thought-provoking and high-quality public discussion. In order to achieve this, MinnPost requires that all commenters register and post comments with their actual names and place of residence. Register here to comment.



    minnpost.com/scientificagenda



    Scientific Agenda reports on important and interesting developments from the world of science in Minnesota and elsewhere. Coverage includes reports from MinnPost journalist Sharon Schmickle, who has won many awards for her science journalism. She has also taken part in several science fellowships, including the Templeton-Cambridge Journalism Fellowship at Cambridge University in England, the Knight Science Journalism program at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a Latin American fellowship sponsored by the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing Inc. in New York.




    Scientific Agenda also features material from other sources, including Inside Science News Service, a Washington, D.C.-based news service, which is supported by the not-for-profit American Institute of Physics, a publisher of scientific journals.

    Recent Scientific Agenda posts