SERVING MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL / MINNESOTA
Donate Now Sustaining Member

MinnPost thanks these major sponsors:




Sponsor of
Second Opinion



Our major advertisers


Our in-kind partners


MinnPost thanks these generous donors:

INDIVIDUALS AND FOUNDATI0NS
Blandin Foundation
Otto Bremer Foundation
Bush Foundation
Sage & John Cowles
David & Vicki Cox
Toby & Mae Dayton
Jack & Claire Dempsey
Ethics and Excellence in Journalism Foundation
Sam & Stacey Heins
John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
Joel & Laurie Kramer
Lee Lynch & Terry Saario
Martin & Brown Foundation
The McKnight Foundation
The Minneapolis Foundation
The Saint Paul Foundation
Rebecca & Mark Shavlik

(See all donors here.)

From Inside Science News Service, Christian Science Monitor
and MinnPost journalist Sharon Schmickle
  • Switch to Small Text Size
  • Switch to Medium Text Size
  • Switch to Large Text Size
Email Print Submit a Comment

    Being obese can help or hurt in a car crash

    By Devin Powell | Published Wed, Mar 3 2010 6:30 am

    WASHINGTON — Researchers have long debated whether being overweight provides an extra cushion that increases the odds of surviving a car crash.

    A new analysis of almost 300,000 accidents from census data from 1998 to 2008 provides the best answer to date: It depends on the gender and seat belt habits of the driver.

    Severely obese men wearing their seat belts during these accidents on average had a 22 percent greater chance of surviving the experience than belted men of average size. But obese men who forgot to buckle up were 10 percent more likely to be killed than unbuckled drivers of average size, according to Michael Sivak of the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute in Ann Arbor.

    Obesity is defined by the body mass index scale, which compares height and weight — a severely obese man who is 5 feet 11 inches tall would weigh more than 250 pounds.

    Sivak suspects — though he cannot prove — that men with a high BMI are more likely to overload the airbag during a crash. A seatbelt may prevent this, allowing extra fat to instead cushion a driver's vital internal anatomy against the forces of the impact.

    For women, though, the data tells a different story. Without a seatbelt, the chance of dying in a car crash is no greater for obese women than it is for skinny or average-sized women — perhaps, speculates Sivak, because heavy women still tend to be lighter than heavy men and are therefore less likely to overload an airbag.

    Average-sized women fared better during accidents when wearing their seat belts than either underweight or overweight women.

    "The real-world advice goes to the designers of restraint systems," said Sivak. "The designs of airbags, safety belts, knee restraints, seats, and other components of occupant restraint systems may need to be improved to better project occupants at both extremes of BMI," he wrote in the research paper, which appeared in the scientific journal Traffic Injury Prevention.

    Like any statistical study, though, the research has some limitations. The seat belt usage data came from police reports — which are not entirely reliable because research has shown that these reports often falsely label unbelted crash survivors as belted. The study also did not examine other factors such as the driver's age, the direction of the collision or the type of injury sustained by the driver.

    Devin Powell reports for Inside Science News Service.

    Like what you just read? Support high-quality journalism in Minnesota by becoming a member of MinnPost.

    Advertisement:

    2 Comments: Hide/Show Comments

    E-mail address

    Password

     

    Forgot Password? | Register to Comment

    MinnPost does not permit the use of foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that may be libelous or interpreted as inciting hate or sexual harassment. User comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure that comments meet these standards and adhere to MinnPost's terms of use and privacy policy.

    We intend for this area to be used by our readers as a place for civil, thought-provoking and high-quality public discussion. In order to achieve this, MinnPost requires that all commenters register and post comments with their actual names and place of residence. Register here to comment.



    minnpost.com/scientificagenda



    Scientific Agenda reports on important and interesting developments from the world of science in Minnesota and elsewhere. Coverage includes reports from MinnPost journalist Sharon Schmickle, who has won many awards for her science journalism. She has also taken part in several science fellowships, including the Templeton-Cambridge Journalism Fellowship at Cambridge University in England, the Knight Science Journalism program at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a Latin American fellowship sponsored by the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing Inc. in New York.




    Scientific Agenda also features material from other sources, including Inside Science News Service, a Washington, D.C.-based news service, which is supported by the not-for-profit American Institute of Physics, a publisher of scientific journals.

    Recent Scientific Agenda posts