Skip to Content

Support MinnPost

MinnPost logo 2014 Summer Member Drive

Readers like you make MinnPost possible
Become a sustaining member today

This content is made possible by the generous sponsorship support of UCare.

U of M study reinforces benefits of later school start times

U of M study reinforces benefits of later school start times
An 8:55 a.m. start time enabled 66 percent of the students to get at least eight hours of sleep — the minimum amount recommended for high-school-aged teens.

 

When high schools switch to later start times, student health and grades improve, according to a University of Minnesota study released Thursday.

The study also found a link between later school start times and a reduction in car crashes involving teens.

Moving back the starting hour did not appear to reduce the amount of time students spent engaged in after-school sports and other activities — a reason frequently cited by school districts for not making the change.

“We now have conclusive proof that this has a positive impact on students,” Kyla Wahlstrom, director of the university's Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement, said in a phone interview with MinnPost on Wednesday.

Began in Edina and Minneapolis

Most of these findings were already known to Wahlstrom and her colleagues, who began studying the topic in the 1990s after both Edina and Minneapolis shifted their high schools to a later start time (8:30 a.m. in Edina, and 8:40 a.m. in Minneapolis).

“We found remarkable changes,” said Wahlstrom. “Kids being awake in class. Parents saying their kids were easier to live with. Teachers saying student behavior in the classrooms and the hallways had improved.”

But questions have arisen as to whether the later start times really had a significant impact on academic achievement. A 2010 study that used Minneapolis data found, for example, that later start times did not improve student scores on the ACT college admission exams.

The university's new study, which was funded by a grant from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), set out to answer those questions. Wahlstrom and her colleagues gathered data from more than 9,000 students attending eight public high schools in three states. All had changed their start times in recent years. Before the switch, most had begun their classes around 7:30 a.m. The new start times ranged from 8:00 a.m. to 8:55 a.m.

Five of the schools were in Minnesota (St. Louis Park High School, Mahtomedi High School, and Woodbury, Park and East Ridge high schools in South Washington County), two were in Colorado (Boulder and Fairview high schools), and one was in Wyoming (Jackson Hole High School).

Key findings

The study found, not surprisingly, that later start times enabled students to get more sleep. An 8:55 a.m. start time, for example, enabled 66 percent of the students to get at least eight hours of sleep — the minimum amount recommended for high-school-aged teens. When schools started at 7:30, however, only 33 percent of the students reported getting that amount of sleep.

Sleep is, of course, essential for good physical and mental health. So it’s also not surprising that teens in the study who reported getting at least eight hours of sleep per night were, as Wahlstrom and her colleagues write, “more likely to say they have good overall health and were less likely to report being depressed or using caffeine and other substances (e.g., alcohol, tobacco, other drugs). Other positive findings include a significant reduction in local car crashes, less absenteeism, less tardiness, as well as higher test scores on national achievement tests.”

Grades also tended to improve, although the overall effect was small and not always consistent. At Mahtomedi High School, for example, there was a significant increase in third-period English grades after the switch to a later start time — but only in the first quarter of the year, when the average grade rose from 2.89 to 3.13. By the fourth quarter the average grade was back down to 2.89.

Wahlstrom did not have readily available yesterday detailed numbers for the improved health outcomes. She said those numbers may be added to the next version of the written report.

Dramatic car crash data

The study also found that car crashes involving teen drivers dropped a stunning 70 percent in Jackson Hole after its high school shifted to an 8:55 a.m. start time (the latest start time of the eight schools in this study).

Car crashes around Mahtomedi High School fell an equally dramatic 65 percent after it shifted to an 8:20 a.m. start time.

But teen-involved crashes around Woodbury High School dropped only 6 percent after the school’s new 8:00 a.m. start time, and those around St. Louis Park High School actually increased by 9 percent after that school switched to an 8:20 a.m. start time.

Wahlstrom believes these discrepancies may be explained by the fact that crash data “is kept by the community, not by the school.” It’s highly likely, she said, that some of the students involved in car crashes on the highways around St. Louis Park High School attended other schools in the metropolitan area. That is much less likely to be the case, she added, on the roads around Mahtomedi High School and especially on those around Jackson Hole High School, which is the only high school in a 200-mile radius.

Of course, the design of this study enables it to show only a correlation, not a cause-and-effect, between later school times and fewer car crashes involving teenagers. Many other factors — differences in weather patterns from one year to the next, for example — might also explain the drop.

‘Lazy’ teenagers

Dozens of school districts across the country have switched to later high school start times. Yet, as the new U of M report acknowledges, the idea continues to be resisted in other districts, often with claims that today’s teenagers are just “lazy” and undisciplined.

“There’s a lot of pushback from people saying we are coddling these teenagers, and that they don’t know what real life is like,” said Wahlstrom.

Sleep science tells a much different story. Recent research has shown that the “tipping point” for teenagers in terms of sleep and health is eight hours. If they routinely get fewer than eight hours of sleep a night, they are more likely to make unhealthful choices about drugs, alcohol, smoking and sex. They are also more likely to show signs of depression.

And just telling teenagers to go to sleep earlier won’t help.

“It’s not like kids can go to bed at 10 p.m. and then fall sleep,” said Wahlstrom. “They can’t.”

Once children enter puberty, their biological clock shifts, including the time at which the pineal gland in their brain releases melatonin, the hormone that induces sleep.

“Their bodies don’t start secreting melatonin until around 10:45,” said Wahlstrom. “That means the earliest they would be waking up is around 7 a.m. So if you have a school that starts at 7 a.m., that doesn’t work.”

You can download and read the full study at the website for the university's Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement.

Get MinnPost's top stories in your inbox

Related Tags:

About the Author:

Comments (2)

Alexandria Will Start This Change in Fall of 2014

I have grandchildren in high school, middle school and elementary schools. I'll be watching with great curiosity how this schedule change effects them.

It has seemed to me that my early teen aged granddaughter who has been getting on the bus at 7:10, has, together with most of her friends, shifted to staying awake until quite late each night, leaving them all short of sleep most of the time. This has seemed to contribute to the already-existing emotional volatility of kids that age.

I'll also be watching to see how my very early grade grandchild does with getting on the bus at 7:10. I was naturally an early riser at that age, so I can only hope that will also be true in this case.

Starting later

I was NOT a particularly early riser, either as a little kid or a teen, but now that I’m in my dotage, I regularly awake about an hour before sunrise, which makes for some especially early mornings from mid-May to mid-July. I share Greg Kapphahn’s curiosity about how shifts in the schedule will affect – or not affect – kids in Alexandria and other places where it’s tried.

The best class I taught during my final decade in the classroom was an “A” period Western Civ. class that started at 7:20 AM (the regular school day began at 8:15 AM), but over the course of a decade, the kids meeting at that hour proved themselves to be extraordinarily motivated, and they regularly outperformed my other Western Civ. classes. Those “regular” classes, which usually started at 8:15 AM and later, saw their share of inattention, and even attempts to nap (I was not cooperative in that regard). On the whole, with the very singular exception of those “A” period groups, my classroom experience as a teacher was very much in line with what’s being reported recently regarding teenaged sleeping habits and sleep-related physiology. Early classes sometimes were energetic, sometimes not, and there didn’t seem to be much predictability about which mode would affect which group on which day.

The most consistent pattern I detected – one not addressed, at least directly, by concerns over sleep or its absence – was that the first class after lunch was a struggle to stay awake for both students and teachers. It was never my best class of the day, either in terms of my own performance or that of the students, and it’s not as if we were all consuming some sort of huge noontime meal of the sort that farm laborers might encounter routinely during the harvest season. Colleagues shared remarkably similar stories of kids “drifting away” mentally for at least a while when they returned from lunch.

I find myself wondering what the effects would/will be if the implications in the report are widely adopted. School days, it seems to me, closely follow corporate or employer days. As a parent, it makes for a MUCH more simple morning if the kids depart for school as you depart for work, or at least everyone is within a few minutes of having duplicate schedules. How will employers respond to pressure from employees who – often for good reason – are not enthused about leaving for work at 8 AM when the kids don’t need to be in school until 9 or 9:30.

Would Target, for example, or Best Buy, or MedTronic, shift their own corporate work day to a later span in order to accommodate a school schedule with demonstrable advantages for the children of their current employees, children who, within a few years, may well be employees themselves? Would retailers like Macy’s or Walmart or, again, Target (earlier I was thinking of Target’s corporate office personnel), be willing to shift their sales floor employee schedules to make the same accommodation? If not, what might the consequences be?

Will we get used to a 10-to-6 workday instead of 8-to-4? What will happen to extracurricular activities if they become, largely by default, evening activities? Will sports practices end up shifting to early morning, before school starts, instead of late afternoon, after school has ended? In the many, many households in which both parents work, how will a 9:30 or 10:00 AM start time for school be accommodated? Will this shift produce a relative boom in day-care and da-care facilities?

And so on – there’s a lot more to this than simply saying “Let ‘em start the day later.” And then, once we’re used to the day working differently, we might have the courage to take a closer look at the 19th-century agrarian calendar being followed in urban and suburban school districts all over the state and country. Taking 10 consecutive weeks off in the summer is not just academically disastrous, it also makes for exceedingly inefficient use of expensive school buildings and facilities.