Skip to Content

Support MinnPost

Timberwolves' off-season makeover: Some healthy skepticism

REUTERS/Brian Snyder
Since the day he was hired in early May, Flip Saunders has been forthright and consistent about how he wanted to revamp the Wolves.

Once the all-but-certain re-signing of restricted free-agent center Nikola Pekovic is on the books (most likely contract terms: four years for $50 million), the active off-season makeover of the Minnesota Timberwolves by new President of Basketball Operations Flip Saunders will be essentially complete.

The good news is that the Wolves are poised to make the 2013-14 campaign their most successful season in a decade, one likely culminated by a playoff appearance. The bad news, at least in my view, is that the Wolves could well have been better off with a lighter tweak of a 2012-13 roster that was ravaged by an incredible slew of injuries.

Since the day he was hired in early May, Saunders has been forthright and consistent about how he wanted to revamp the Wolves. His priorities were bolstering the team’s outside shooting and balancing the roster with taller wingmen in place of undersized combo guards. Among players whose contractual status was in flux, he made no secret of his determination to re-sign both Pekovic and unrestricted free agent Chase Budinger, and seemed far less enthusiastic about the possibility that Andrei Kirilenko might pick up his $10.2 million player option for 2013-14, or renegotiate a longer term deal involving less annual money.

Aside from an unfortunate draft night, when an unpredictable array of early picks deprived the Wolves of all the players they coveted, Saunders seems to have been able to execute his off-season blueprint in near-perfect fashion. In recent media appearances he has giddily acknowledged that he can’t contain his enthusiasm about the prospects of what he has assembled. Reaction in the dailies and on fan websites has likewise been mostly positive.

Optimism is easy right now. It is a safe bet that the franchise won’t suffer the relentless havoc of physical woe that sabotaged last season pretty much from start to finish. As it was, the Wolves still won 31 games — 20 fewer than they lost, sure, but more victories than any Timberwolves outfit that didn’t possess Kevin Garnett. A lack of improvement this season would be regarded as a catastrophe.

Meanwhile, Saunders — presumably with extensive advice from coach Rick Adelman — performed as promised, beginning with the retention of Budinger and (probably) Pek, via long-term contracts. He waded into free agency to secure potent scorer Kevin Martin and antic defender Corey Brewer, who, at 6-7 and 6-9, respectively, provide more size on the wing, even as 6-2 Luke Ridnour — the poster boy for Minnesota’s diminutive backcourt as an overmatched shooting guard last season — was traded away to free up salary space for the new arrivals.

He has added depth in the frontcourt with free agent center Ronny Turiaf and the second of Minnesota’s first-round draft picks, Gorgui Dieng of Louisville. The other first-rounder, Shabazz Muhammad of UCLA, is another tall (6-6), offensive-oriented wing player. Consequently, forward Derrick Williams and guard Alexey Shved, who both finished among the top six in minutes-played for the Wolves last season, will have to work hard just to earn time from the end of the bench.

What’s not to like, eh? Actually, quite a bit.

The Saunders overreaction  

The more I look at Saunders’ off-season wheeling and dealing, the more convinced I am that he overreacted to the need for more offense and, with the help of some unfortunate circumstances, locked the Wolves into being the sort of chronically deficient defensive team that can’t get out of the first round of the playoffs. Last year’s roster was imbalanced because of a preponderance of small backcourt personnel. This year, the imbalance will come from the difficulty of coming up with a five-man unit that can both score and defend at a competitive level.

At first glance, it is hard to rebut Saunders’ contention that the team’s greatest need was outside shooters. Minnesota finished dead-last in the NBA in three-point shooting percentage, the primary reason the Wolves were 25th out of 30 teams in offensive efficiency — points scored per possession. And led by the success of the San Antonio Spurs and Golden State Warriors in the playoffs last season, the league-wide trend is for more emphasis on long-range marksmanship.

But the Wolves’ feeble results from the three-point arc a year ago were caused by a dearth of health more than talent. Budinger came over from Houston last season with a career 36.3 percent average from three-point range, and figured to improve that accuracy given his compatibility and familiarity with Adelman’s system. But a knee injury felled him after just six games, and when he returned more than four months later to play the final 17 games, he acknowledges now that he was physically limited.

Even more significant was the loss and physical compromise of superstar Kevin Love, who broke bones in his shooting hand on two separate occasions last season. Not only did the injuries sideline Love for 64 games, but severely hampered his shooting stroke in the 18 games he did play. While there was significant regression in his layups, midrange jumpers and free throws, the bum hand was most debilitating to Love’s three-point shooting. Consider that in his two prior seasons, he converted 41.7 and 37.2 percent of his shots from distance. Last year, his accuracy plummeted to 21.7 percent.

It is reasonable to assume that Love and Budinger create outside-shooting synergy when paired together, not only because of their accuracy but also Budinger’s ability to move without the ball and Love’s ability to create mismatches luring big men outside the paint — both stimulate better spacing and fluidity. Well, Bud and Love never played a single minute together in 2012-13.

A healthy Kevin Love and Chase Budinger in rotation together for an entire season — with slick-passing point guard Ricky Rubio distributing the ball — will by itself be an enormous boon to the Wolves' prowess from beyond the arc in 2013-14, without Saunders needing to add a single piece from a year ago. (The offense will also improve because Rubio will have had an entire off-season to work on his jumper, something that couldn’t happen a year ago as he recuperated from knee surgery.)

But Saunders decided the Wolves also needed the outside shooting and overall scoring punch of Martin. My extended take on the Martin acquisition can be gleaned here. Suffice to say that he is a marvelous and versatile point producer. But he is also a sub-mediocre on-ball defender and an absolutely wretched help defender. And the person he will essentially replace in the starting lineup, Kirilenko, is every bit as marvelous and versatile on defense as K-Mart is on offense.

Why the defense will decline

Perhaps the lone silver lining in the MASH-Unit campaign of a year ago was the surprisingly effective performance of the Wolves’ defense. The team ranked 13th — in the top half of the NBA — in defensive efficiency, determined by fewest points allowed per possession defended. In my estimation, the three people in the organization who were most responsible for that feat are Kirilenko, Pekovic and the assistant coach in charge of defense, Bill Bayno. Now two of them are gone.

Bayno, who left the team to take a promotion as lead assistant to head coach Dwane Casey in Toronto, was able to mold a team with just one premier defender (Kirilenko) into a cohesive unit that moved its feet, mostly hewed to their disciplined assignments and didn’t give opponents chances to extend their possessions with offensive rebounds or free throws. The Wolves weren’t that great at making opponents miss — they ranked 24th in opponents’ field goal percentage and 23rd in opponents’ three-point percentage — but they were a top 12 team in both offensive and defensive rebounding percentage and, most significantly, allowed the fifth-fewest free throw attempts in the NBA, while attempting the fifth-most themselves. Bayno preached either standing tall or jumping up straight with arms outstretched so as not to initiate contact, and for the most part the players listened.

Bayno will be replaced by Rick Adelman’s son, David. While the feedback on him from within the organization is very positive, beneficiaries of nepotism need to prove they merit the job. Even if David Adelman performs well, it is unreasonable to expect him or any of the other assistant coaches on the Wolves staff to match Bayno’s performance last season. He didn’t get promoted for nothing.

Bayno frequently cited Pekovic as the team’s best pick-and-roll defender, and the burly center, a fouling machine his first season in the league, also became a master of simply holding his ground with his granite-like physique and deterring penetration without drawing a whistle.

But the single most important figure on the Wolves’ defense last season was Kirilenko. He was the wing stopper, the one invariably pitted against the opponents’ top gun, regardless of whether it was a lithe, silky shooter like Kevin Durant, a crafty veteran like Kobe Bryant, or a larger, more rugged point-producer such as Lebron James or Carmelo Anthony.

What all these elite scorers have in common is the ability to draw fouls, and yet AK set the example for the rest of the team in limiting opponents’ trips to the free throw line. According to figures from the website, the Wolves’ committed four fewer fouls per 100 possessions with AK on the court, compared with when he was on the bench. At the other end of the court, they drew two more fouls per 100 possessions when Kirilenko played, compared with when he sat. That’s a whopping plus-6 on Minnesota’s foul differential per 100 possessions with AK in the lineup. And they were a significantly better rebounding team, especially on the offensive glass.

Considering that he primarily took a breather when the opponents’ best scorer was also out of the game, it is somewhat remarkable that Minnesota yielded 0.5 fewer points per 100 possessions when Kirilenko was playing, compared with when he wasn’t. They also scored 3.6 more points per 100 possessions when he was in the game.

It currently remains a mystery, worthy of suspicion, why Kirilenko would turn down the $10.2 million remaining on his deal with the Wolves this coming season in order to play the next two years in Brooklyn for about a third of that annual amount — a combined salary of just $6.4 million.  Perhaps it is because Kirilenko and Brooklyn owner Mikhail Prokhorov are both Russian, or that he feels the Nets offer the best chance for him to play for an NBA champion for the first time in his career.

Whatever the reason, something went a little bit sour between Kirilenko and the Wolves. I don’t know if Saunders expressed little interest in AK’s return because he knew there was no chance of retaining him, or if Kirilenko bolted because he sensed he wasn’t in the Wolves’ plans moving forward. Either way, it’s shocking how little negative blowback the Wolves have received for agreeing to pay Martin $28 million over the next four years and Brewer $15 million for the next three years, while a three-time All Defensive Team selection who was on the roster last season is playing for a bargain-basement rate in Brooklyn.

Yes, Kirilenko will be 32 in February, regularly misses 10 to 15 games a season with a chronic back problem, and likely doesn’t have more than two or three good seasons left in him. But the bottom line is that the Wolves no longer have a wing stopper on the team, which is a gaping hole for any franchise that hopes to be anything more than first-round fodder in the postseason. And with all the salaries Saunders has inked this off-season, it will be very difficult for Minnesota to acquire one over the next few seasons.

The signing of Brewer was meant to address this defensive deficiency, but expecting him to replace Kirilenko would be a doomed strategy. Brewer’s constant hustle and kamikaze penchant for inducing chaos on the court, for better and for worse, makes him one of the NBA’s more likable and entertaining performers. He has improved as a player since former Wolves POBO David Kahn traded him in February 2011 after he spent most of his first four seasons in Minnesota.

But Brewer is more of a boutique defender — a disrupter — than a stopper, for reasons mostly beyond his control. His natural physique includes arguably the skinniest calves in the NBA, stilt-like appendages that allow him to put just 185 pounds on his 6-9 frame. That’s just 10 pounds more than Luke Ridnour and J.J. Barea; the same weight as Golden State’s guard Stephen Curry. By comparison, Durant weighs 220 pounds, Lebron 240, Melo 230, Kobe 200, Dwyane Wade 212. Kirilenko weighs 220 and would come out of matchups with those elite scorers bruised and sore. You can expect Dante Cunningham, more than Brewer, to be the primary defender off the bench against these larger wing scorers.

The last two seasons Brewer spent in Denver showed off his talents in the best light. Nuggets coach George Karl loves the up-and-down, willy-nilly style that is Brewer’s métier, and he could throw Brewer in the pond with similar uptempo athletes such as Kenneth Faried and Ty Lawson and watch them run opponents ragged at both ends of the court. But crucially, Karl also understood that a disrupter like Brewer worked best alongside a legitimate wing stopper who could help cover for his enthusiasms, which is why Brewer was paired with Andre Iguodala — Denver’s Kirilenko — more than any other Nugget last season.

Even in Denver, however, Brewer occasionally hurt the team by playing out of control. His breakneck, heedless approach is both his vice and his virtue and can easily lead to poor shot selection. Brewer launched more shots per minute-played last season than anyone in the Nuggets 10-man rotation — including Danilo Gallinari, one of the most feared outside marksmen in the game — yet had the lowest effective field goal percentage (which counts both field goals and three-pointers) of those 10 players. In other words, he shot the most and made the least.

All that said, Brewer was not a terrible acquisition. He’s always been the type of player who exerts a greater impact on the court, as a catalyst, than on the stat sheet. For all his shooting woes, he did convert more than 40 percent of his three-pointers from the left corner area last season, and if he can come close to approximating that accuracy and otherwise foster ball movement on offense, he’ll be a valuable cog. On defense, he’ll frequently give a perimeter opponent fits with his wiry diligence and form a dynamic gambling backcourt duo with Rubio when they are paired together.

More fun than prizes

Let me close this novella-length column the way I started it, by stating that the Wolves are likely on the verge of their most successful season in a decade. If Love and Rubio are healthy, Pek is indeed back, and Budinger and Martin exploit Adelman’s offense to deliver offensive firepower, Minnesota will probably win between 45 and 50 games and reward their long-suffering fans with a playoff appearance and an entertaining style of play.

But if the optimism is legitimate, so are the concerns, and they have understandably been less prevalent in discussions about the team and its prospects for the 2013-14 season. As it stands now, and likely will in the near future, the Wolves have been assembled to be crowd-pleasers. But championship contenders, not so much.

Get MinnPost's top stories in your inbox

Related Tags:

About the Author:

Comments (14)


It seems to me that there was a decision to be made, embrace Kirilenko or move on. I agree with Flip that it was necessary to move on.

There is no doubt that Kirilenko is a good defensive player but he is not getting any younger and does not seem like the type of player the Wolves will be able to build around for years to come. Let's say the Wolves kept Kirilenko. If for example, the Wolves made the playoffs in the upcoming season and exited in the first round, where would they go from there? Kirilenko is a year older, an UFA, and is going to be looking for top dollar from the Wolves. Moreover, the Wolves would have passed on many options the year prior. Once again, the Wolves would be in a no win situation – resign Kirilenko and stay mediocre or don’t resign Kirilenko and start back up the player search.

With K-Mart, we have him secured for 4 years and he brings a far greater offensive upside. Also, letting go of Kirilenko freed up money for defensive role players like Brewer. As a result, now the core of our team will have multiple years together to grow. I firmly believe if the Wolves improve defensively it will have to be on the shoulders of K-Love, Pek, and Rubio to become great defensive players. If your stars don’t want to play defense you will never win (i.e. Melo). On the opposite side, if you star players play defensive you can make a good team a championship team (i.e. KG, LeBron, Wade, Duncan). It helps to have good defensive role players but the defensive responsibility ultimately resides with the star players who are on the floor the most.

some points of contention

Thanks for chiming in with a well-thought-out and meaty post.
Agreed that AK is not getting any younger. But disagree that means we should cut the cord sooner rather than later, especially with no adequate replacement. First, AK had "top dollar" this year at $10 m and turned it down. If it was for a longer spell, say something like 3 years and $21 million, I believe that to be a better investment than either K-Mart or Brewer's deal. I believe Budinger is more redundant with Martin than anyone on the Wolves existing roster is redundant with Kirilenko. You need balance and right now the Wolves are unbalanced in terms of much better offensive personnel than defensive personnel.
I could make the same point about Martin, who will be 35 years old at the end of his deal. He is just two years younger than Kirilenko, and he is not the type of talent that a team can build around--he's a complementary figure.
My second point of contention is your belief that the stars are ultimately the most important defenders. Sometimes that is true--Lebron and Duncan clearly fit the theory. But in OKC, the key defender is not Durant or Westbrook, it is Thabo Sefolosha. The wing stopper in San Antonio is not Parker or Ginobili, it is Leonard. In Memphis Marc Gasol is reigning defensive player of the year, but they don't get to the conference finals without Tony Allen.
The point is, yes, of course Love needs to step up his defense, and I believe Pek and Rubio are already quality defenders. But none of them should be expected to contain the elite wing scorers on the opposing team because they aren't physically built for that task. Kirilenko, rare among Wolves personnel, is physically built for that task.That's why he is so valuable, even in his declining dotage.


A couple points:

1. If AK had picked up his option, there is no doubt a year from now we would be looking at having to substantially overpay to retain AK. There is simply no way the Wolves get the bargain the Nets got. Additionally, this off-season we actually had good players interested in signing with Minnesota. When that happens, go for it. There is no guarantee we would be able to bring in a shooter like K-mart next year. If we didn’t sign K-Mart this year, we would again be looking at a giant hole at the 2 spot this season (and no, Budinger is not a starting 2 guard).

2. As you acknowledge, AK has broken down during the season and it will likely only get worse. K-Mart isn’t much younger but has no signs of breakdown like AK.

3. I agree with your last point regarding defense. We do need a wing stopper. I am hopeful Brewer can be this guy especially when he matures and puts on more weight (if this ever happens). I also think Rubio could assist in wing duties based on his size at 6-4. This is question mark but I believe it’s an area where someone on this team will need to step up (Shabazz eventually?). Furthermore, if we make the playoffs and have a solid series or run, we could be looking for that one piece (defensive stopper) next off-season.

AK and K-Mart


It is a fundamental disagreement. You (and Flip Saunders) believe that Kevin Martin is a more valuable commodity, both on the Wolves and overall, than Andrei Kirilenko over the next 2-3 years time.

I don't.

Yes on defense

I think the loss of Bayno will have a larger impact on our defense than the loss of AK. It's not always easy to quantify, but it's not always player personnel that impacts defense. Adelman has been successful without needing elite defensive players - those early 00's Kings teams had one "stopper" in Doug Christie, but defensive sieves in Peja and Mike Bibby. Obviously Webber and Divac were much different players than Love and Pek (and probably a better defensive tandem), but I think our guys can also complement each other on both ends of the floor, even if neither is a top-tier defensive player. (I really wish there were better defensive stats from the 90's and early 00's, but oh well) Of course, you can probably make a good counter-argument by pointing to Adelman's best Rockets team (08-09), which featured Yao, Artest, Battier, and other quality defensive players.

As a fan, it's really hard for me to sustain my optimism after the excitement of last offseason, especially seeing the way it ended. Stylistically, I think I would've enjoyed last season's roster at full health more than this season's, which is why it's tough to part with playmakers like AK and calming influences like Ridnour. But I remember Saunders' teams here were focused on guys who can take and knock down an open jumper. I'm a optimistic that getting a shooter like Martin who also gets to the line will help Ricky's development more than playing with a hesitant shooter like AK. But as you mentioned, Corey is also a guy who is willing to shoot even if the percentages don't back it up - but if those looks come in transition or a broken play, I'll take my chances on the offensive glass if Love and Pek are both out there.

And let's also remember that hopefully our health and roster diversity means we are less reliant on younger players. Adelman had little choice but to play Shved more minutes than he should have, so the additional guard depth should allow us to more effectively use him. Also, those who are unsure about whether Shabazz will be a legit scorer should be relieved that he will not automatically "earn" minutes by our lack of swingman depth (and the same goes for Dieng and Derrick Williams, to an extent).

Bayno important, AK moreso

I'm a huge Bayno fan, but I think the step down from AK to whoever is steeper than whoever replaces Bayno, because Adelman still has ultimate sway in terms of doling out minutes, and he is an underrated defensive coach in his own right. In other words, the head coach will mitigate some of Bayno's loss. I'm less confident about the Brewer-Cunningham duo mitigating Kirilenko's loss, let along K-Mart and Budinger.
I obviously agree with you about the value of last year's roster--I too would have been happier with more continuity. And I'm not sure Ricky's development would have been much deterred by AK's reluctance, if only because AK would move the ball more rapidly than K-Mart, which also facilitates Ricky's rhythm.
As for the younger subs, if I am Derrick Williams, I am doing nothing but working on my defense this offseason--ditto Shabazz. That is the best shot at carving out playing team on this team right now, and the player who comes in hungry to get stops on D will be doing himself and the team a big favor.
As always, great post.

AK is a great defender, but...

This is just speculation on my part, but I get the feeling that our braintrust wasn't a fan of the way he freelanced on both ends of the court, which is the same knock that famed disciplinarian (and "system guy") Jerry Sloan had on him. I was a little surprised that the Spurs were rumored to go after him, as I think AK needs a pretty long leash in order to succeed (not to mention he can't just stand in the corner and shoot threes). But being recognized as a great defender does not always mean you are playing the best team defense (read: putting your teammates in a position to be most effective). AK is great on-ball, as a help defender, and as a disruptor in passing lanes, but I think his willingness to chase his man everywhere on the court can sometimes cause other players to wind up out of position or confused about assignments (such as at the end of games where we might try to switch on all screens, AK has the talent to read where the play is going and be disruptive - which can cut both ways). And when guys get out of position, defensive assignments and rotations break down and we're collectively more likely to give up a bucket.

Now, I'm not saying that definitely happened (I'm a little grateful that companies like SynergySports don't sell to fans, or I'd spend hours watching video), but AK spent quite a bit of time playing with young guys who weren't always engaged, such as Shved and D-Will. Perhaps Adelman can help hide the defensive flaws of those players, but only if everyone else plays their part...

Plenty to be skeptical about

I don't think fan reaction is as positive as you're portraying it. Many local guys covering the Wolves spent a lot of time responding to complaints about their moves. Some of it is deserved ($, years, Brewer's offense), but some it isn't (complaining that they signed Turiaf); in general, they've been able to plan for injuries fairly well and balance out the roster position-wise, though I was really hoping they'd get Redick once it became clear he was interested.

2 unknowns stand out to me. First, how much have we overrated AK's defense? Having a guy who could play 30+mpg, stay in front of top scorers, and challenge shots is important, and he did that effectively. We've all seen the problems that arise when a guy like that isn't on the roster, and he was undoubtedly their best guy for guarding wing scorers. But it's clear that Adelman was okay with letting him go. I assume he had good reasons. One may be something related to the second unknown, but I don't think he was a stopper, and he probably wasn't as good in the team scheme as we thought. Also, while (based on their draft history) this seems as unlikely as Pek lasering off all his tattoos, athletic wing defenders can be found later in the draft and possibly taught to knock down 3s. Kawhi Leonard, Iman Shumpert, Jimmy Butler, Avery Bradley, Quincy Pondexter, and Lance Stephenson were all drafted outside of the lottery in recent seasons.

Second, it's not clear how much of a jump in offense the additions will make for this team, and it could be into the top half if not the top 10. When guys can't shoot, the defense packs the paint; when guys are hesitant to shoot open shots, it messes up the rhythm of the offense and the positioning of offensive rebounders as well. Having a 1 and a 3 who are below-average shooters and hesitate to shoot can lead to a lot of forced shots like we saw last season, and pairing them with Ridnour (whose career % is inflated by his 44% in his 1st season here) hurt as well. While it may not seem like switching a non-shooter for a shooter makes a difference, Martin's history in Adelman offenses and his ability to convert from most spots on the floor (even at the rim) is an offensive addition on another level than, for example, OJ Mayo. More possessions ending in made shots and better offensive and defensive rebounding (they could easily go from top 10-11 to top 3 if Love plays 60+ games) may also help offset any defensive deficiencies.

I'm not convinced that this team can still be a fringe contender, but that was always going to be decided by Love, Rubio, and Pekovic. Other role players have to hide their weaknesses and augment their strengths, but those 3 also have to reduce their weaknesses and take their strengths to another level. At this point, they can still get good role players through the draft, and that's what (besides Love's future plans) will affect their future as much as anything.

AK revisionism


You and Anton, two really smart guys whose opinions I respect, both suggest that Kirilenko's defense may be overrated. But what, aside from supposing Adelman's judgment and then having blind faith in it (which I'll confess has been an occasional barometer for me too at times), are we basing this on? I mean, it isn't that much of a mystery--we all saw 82 games of Wolves basketball last season and AK was the team's best wing defende. And it wasn't even close.

But you also are exercising some revisionist history on Kirilenko's offense. True, he was a reluctant shooter. But saying he "can't shoot" or ""was a below-average shooter" simply isn't accurate. Yes, his percentages outside the paint were very low, so when he was on the wing he moved the ball; when he saw a lane, he drove and almost always finished. But it all added up to a True Shooting Percentage of 59.0%, easily the highest among the Wolves' rotation players (Pek was second at 57.2, Luke third at 53.2, per Basketball Reference ( And, as I mentioned, according to (, the Wolves scored 3.6 more points per 100 possessions when AK was on the court compared to when he wasn't. Pek was higher at 5.3 pp100p--and is getting a monster contract largely because of it--but no other Timberwolf exerted a more positive impact on the offense. So regardless of whether opponents were packing the paint on AK and Rubio or not, Kirilenko was more successful than the other guys.

I agree that the Wolves will be explosive, versatile and very fun to watch on offense next season, somewhere in the top 10, which ain't shabby, considering they were 25th last season. But I think they would have been at or in the top 10 with AK instead of K-Mart--and much better defensively.


First, I was referring to 3 point shooting. I understand he's highly efficient as a scorer, though not high volume. It probably shouldn't be implied that shooting refers to jump shooting, but it's not a stretch to say his efficient offensive game overshadows him being one of the worst jump shooters for a starting wing in the league.

Second, it's not revisionist to question whether he's a stopper. You said early in the season that he's not at Luol Deng's level on D. After watching him get beat by Harrison Barnes early in the season, I questioned what level he was at. I said in my first comment that they needed someone as a wing defender like what he brought last season. He's clearly still good, but he's not a stopper like Tony Allen, Iguodala, or LeBron is. He did some good things vs. LeBron and Melo, and Durant went above his season averages vs the Wolves (AK played all 4 games). The reason I trust Adelman more than my eyes or yours is because he's watched the tape and seen the SportVU data. AK seemed like a great fit for him, yet he didn't fight for AK like he did Bud and Martin. That means something.

As a fan, I'm always going to hope something works out. I was glad AK was here, but now that he's not, I'm trying to test out theories why this could work out.

AK may not be a "stopper"

but he doesn't need much -- any? -- help when guarding the Durants and Carmelos. When it instead becomes Budinger or even Brewer checking the other team's best wing, the defensive schemes might get more distorted than they were last season. I assume this will naturally lead to more breakdowns.

On balance, I'm okay with the broad-brush swap that Flip conducted. The Timberwolves, barring an unforeseen rise in Rubio's shooting prowess or Love's defensive mobility and dedication, were not going to be a true championship contender in the next year or two whether they went the Kirilenko/defense route, or the Martin/shooting route. I guess I view it as roughly equal substance with very different style, and they chose the style that better complements Ricky Rubio, the face of the franchise.

Fair enough

PSR--A reasonable assessment and clarification. "Stopper" is obviously an ephemeral standard in the eye of the beholder. But I think we can all agree he is the best wing defender they had, and apparently will experience a significant drop off in that area this season. And that seems like a missed opportunity to me.
Andy--I understand your logic, and share your belief that they are likely not contenders without some unforeseen good fortune, but still feel that the Kevin Martins of the NBA are easier to come by than the Andrei Kirilenkos. The fact that we have a K-Mart facsimile in Budinger (who, contrary to Michael Johnson's assertion above, most certainly can play the 2) and need to cobble together a Cunningham-Brewer combo to approximate AK (all the while paying Brew more than AK will make in Brooklyn), while neither is as gifted offensively as AK, doesn't feel like an even-up choice to me.

I guess, as we

I guess, as we argued/discussed here a while back, I'm not crazy about having Rubio and Kirilenko on the floor at the same time. Together with Pekovic, that's at least 3 out of 5 that can't reliably make open shots. I don't know if that works in the 2013 NBA.

I get your point though, and the defense is going to be worse without last year's MVP.

Kirilenko: Two Things

Great article! Two things to add about Kirilenko.

1) It's not just his defense. Even in overall performance ratings (e.g. PER, WS) he ranks above Martin (and well above Brewer). In the BSE rating, for example, the NBA average is about 4.0, the top 100 players above 5.0, and the elite (top 30, or so) above 6.0. Last year Kirilenko was at 5.41 (65th best in the league). Martin was at 3.87 (192nd in the league).

2) It is reasonable to think that Kirilenko might have been the Wolves' best chance at mentoring Shved, who, despite struggling in the latter part of his rookie season, showed some real promise early on. At 6'6", perhaps he could have developed into that longer shooting guard that Flip was after. Then again, Flip has made it clear that he considers Shved a point guard only.

In any case, the article's thesis--that there has been an overreaction in the attempt to compensate for dismal 3-point shooting and short shooting guards--seems very astute. The roster is at least a little weaker this year, though certainly they will win more games provided they don't all get injured again.