
Our major sponsors
Sponsor of
Second Opinion
Sponsor of
Community Sketchbook
Our major advertisers
Our in-kind partners

MinnPost thanks these generous donors:
INDIVIDUALS AND FOUNDATI0NS
Blandin Foundation
Otto Bremer Foundation
Bush Foundation
Sage & John Cowles
David & Vicki Cox
Toby & Mae Dayton
Jack & Claire Dempsey
Ethics and Excellence in Journalism Foundation
Sam & Stacey Heins
John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
Joel & Laurie Kramer
Lee Lynch & Terry Saario
Martin & Brown Foundation
The McKnight Foundation
The Minneapolis Foundation
The Saint Paul Foundation
Rebecca & Mark Shavlik
(See all donors here.)

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Democrats in Minnesota's congressional delegation reacted tonight with cautious optimism to President Obama's order to send another 30,000 U.S. troops to Afghanistan. Some lawmakers said they agreed with parts of the plan but remained skeptical about others.
In a prime-time speech, Obama said the additional troops will go to Afghanistan beginning early next year in an effort to finally win a war begun eight years ago as a response to the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.
"Afghanistan is not lost, but for several years it has moved backwards," Obama said, noting momentum by the Taliban, al Qaeda safe havens along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border and continuing difficulty in securing the country. "In short: The status quo is not sustainable."
Obama said he plans to begin withdrawing combat troops as early as summer 2011, about 18 months after the surge arrives.
Rep Tim Walz, a Democrat, called the speech "the first page in a new chapter on Afghanistan" but questioned how the administration would pay fund the troop increase.
Rep. Keith Ellison, a Democrat who has been opposed to a troop increase in the country until corruption in the Afghan government is cleaned up, said he remains "uncomfortable with the troop increase" but was encouraged by the president's strict timeline and focus on strengthening the country's civil society.
Parts of the plan even drew some support from at least one Minnesota Republican, with Rep. Michele Bachmann saying she was "pleased that the president has finally decided to follow the recommendation of our commanding officer in Afghanistan and deploy more troops to the country."
Still, deep divisions remain. For example, Bachmann and GOP Rep. John Kline blasted the strict withdrawal timeline that Ellison and Rep. Jim Oberstar, a Democrat, praised.
The case for Obama's plan will be made again repeatedly in the coming days.
Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, are scheduled to testify in a pair of hearings on the Afghanistan plan Wednesday, with a third hearing planned for Thursday.
Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., said she will be focused on those hearings and future briefings to gauge "how this strategy will prevent Afghanistan from serving as a base for terrorism, the specific resources that will be necessary to carry out this mission, and the additional costs that it will require."
She added: "Our troops deserve nothing less."
Derek Wallbank is MinnPost's Washington, D.C., correspondent. He can be reached at dwallbank[at]minnpost[dot]com.
Like what you just read? Support high-quality journalism in Minnesota by becoming a member of MinnPost.
3 Comments: Hide/Show Comments
Forgot Password? | Register to Comment
MinnPost does not permit the use of foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that may be libelous or interpreted as inciting hate or sexual harassment. User comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure that comments meet these standards and adhere to MinnPost's terms of use and privacy policy.
We intend for this area to be used by our readers as a place for civil, thought-provoking and high-quality public discussion. In order to achieve this, MinnPost requires that all commenters register and post comments with their actual names and place of residence. Register here to comment.