Most Commented
-
40 comments
-
32 comments
-
21 comments
-
15 comments
-
10 comments
MinnPost is a nonprofit, nonpartisan enterprise whose mission is to provide high-quality journalism for news-intense people who care about Minnesota.
Donations and pledges totaling $25,000 or more have been made by each of the families and foundations listed. For a list of all donors by category, see our most recent Year End Report.
The issue here is that congressional Republicans are having it both ways. Decrying the majority's use of arcane parliamentary techniques as "breaking the rules" and subversion of democracy is one thing (especially if your party was said techniques' largest user in years and decades past), but you can't point fingers at the Democrats for using them when you're the ones stopping them from going the more traditional route! If they want to give congressional Democrats the chance to drop...
The difference between 2005 and today is that the 2005 issue revolved around whether or not the Republicans should/would blow up the filibuster. Not reconciliation. The trick here is that both possibilities have been labeled as the "nuclear option" by the minority parties at their respective times. Republicans are now calling reconciliation the "nuclear option", when, as you so clearly pointed out, they used it often to advance their own agenda when they were in power.
But if you...
It's peek. Peek. Sneak peek. One of the many inscrutable inconsistencies inherent in the English language, but until Webster lists it as an accepted spelling for this meaning of the word, you guys should follow tradition.