Skip to Content

Christopher Moseng

Minneapolis, MN
Commenter for
3 years 26 weeks

Recent Comments

Posted on 10/02/12 at 11:45 am in response to Why did the Star Tribune let Matt Birk talk while ignoring Chris Kluwe?

Your purported debunking of Kluwe's debunking of Birk's piece, by asserting that Kluwe's systematic identification of the fallacies in Birk's op-ed relies on tired logical fallacies (though not itself reproduced above, but apparently published elsewhere on this site in diaspora and incorporated by reference) is itself dependent on logical fallacies too numerous to reproduce in this text box.

Your turn.

Posted on 09/27/12 at 09:01 am in response to 'unSpinning' Mark Ritchie’s Voter ID claims

Feel free to turn that "spin-zone" rule of thumb on the people promoting this radical change to our State Constitution any time. They're the ones seeking to alter the status quo, after all.

It depresses me that proponents of this amendment persist in the illusion of rational debate. It demeans us all to have to read flimsy, paper-thin 'reasoning' in defense of the measure, rather than having them own up to it being an emotional and religious issue for their part.

You can recognize two-party civil marriages without the institution disintegrating as claimed. Scaremongering about a slippery slope isn't an appeal to rationality. The claim that "Minnesotans favoring the...

I'd be willing to accept this offer in a formal, structured format hosted by MinnPost—not in comments—on the condition that future presentations of our arguments were not allowed in comments to any future articles. Comments are a lousy place for substantive debates, because the "victor" is generally the one who appreciates the diminishing value of the exchange last.

Instead, let us hash it out definitively, and in a more public forum. A forum suited for the gravity of the debate. I...

Posted on 05/03/12 at 11:53 am in response to Hiawatha struggles to become a destination, not a corridor

While the aesthetic observations are accurate, the article seems to lack the perspective of the neighborhoods at issue. Surely, the neighborhood organizations along the route have some insight into the recent pace and nature of development, but I guess since none of them are headquartered right on Hiawatha, it doesn't occur to contact them for their view. I know as someone living in a Hiawatha-adjacent hood (who has spent a fair share of his life sitting at its stoplights--to cross it as...

This bill doesn't go far enough. There is absolutely nothing in the language that prevents people from imagining there are "zombie voters."

Since this is all about people's unfounded fears, and not about actually addressing a real problem—as the senate author conceded during debate—the bill should have included compulsory psychotherapy for every voter who votes for this Rorschach test of a ballot question. Without it, we can be sure to be chasing down ghosts with our election policy...

The notion that opposing or vetoing a law like this favors perpetrators is begging the question. The law short circuits society's long established means—prosecution and trial—of coming to identify who the perpetrator is, and therefore who to punish. This law is nothing more than authorization, and I would argue incentive, to escalate confrontations and to be darned sure you kill whoever might otherwise contradict your version of who the perpetrator was. Whoever's dead must have been the perp...

Posted on 03/22/12 at 04:38 pm in response to Election official: Insufficient resources to implement Voter ID

I am sure the criminal conspirator masterminds who were risking felony charges under the existing system would never think to buy fake IDs. That would be a bridge too far for their elaborate, Oceans 11-style voting caper. After all, fake IDs are illegal!

Did you realize that according to Rep. Kiffmeyer, ANY state's ID would fulfill the ID requirement? Do you think the elderly volunteers who currently staff our polling places will be trained to recognize authentic IDs from all 50...

Posted on 03/23/12 at 08:49 am in response to ID'ing the problem: What's really behind opposition to Voter ID

I was right there with you, and felt this was a relatively even-handed approach (if a little myopic about poverty), but then all the good will and most of the credibility went out the window at the end when it wandered into conspiracy theory territory. After two of the most-scrutinized elections in state history, with the polls teeming with self-appointed fraud watchers, there is still no evidence to support your suspicion. In most aspects of life conspiracy theories are given little regard...

Posted on 03/23/12 at 09:09 am in response to ID'ing the problem: What's really behind opposition to Voter ID

Setting aside that the Legacy Amendment has bipartisan support, the Legacy Amendment was wrong and shortsighted, and so is Voter ID. Neither belong in the constitution.

Minnesota doesn't have a referendum process that allows voters to pass statutes. Jumping to the constitiution should be considered serious business, not (perceived) political tit-for-tag policy chalkboard. It will make our state ungovernable, just as it has California.