Most Commented
-
27 comments
-
22 comments
-
19 comments
-
18 comments
-
15 comments
MinnPost is a nonprofit, nonpartisan enterprise whose mission is to provide high-quality journalism for news-intense people who care about Minnesota.
Donations and pledges totaling $25,000 or more have been made by each of the families and foundations listed. For a list of all donors by category, see our most recent Year End Report.
I don't get Wisconsin numbers but will check if they are available for the Twin Cities market in the future. (I don't think so or they'd be listed.)
As far as I know, podcasts are not included in the Arb numbers. There is a separate ratings line for streaming, and in the past has added 0.1-0.3 percent share. Nothing listed in July, and including streaming wouldn't change the trend long-term. It's still a niche technology, even nichier than public radio, but I'm watching it.
Streaming listeners are counted in a separate line item (similar to a separate station). The totals are quite small, though, not enough to make a material difference in the overall analysis, yet anyway.
M&S aside, the trend seems longer than a few recent low-news months. I'd lean toward Arbitron panel if I was going outside MPR's walls.
... which I don't in this case.
Will ask in the follow ups.
There's no doubt in my mind that some digital circulation is better than others. Strib CEO Mike Klingensmith once pegged each paid digital subscription at about $100 per user. There's undoubtedly decent profit there, since production/distribution costs are nil. That has to be much better than the digital non-replica (app) user who never pays - a category that is also included in today's figures. (There will be more on this in my follow-up story.)
The...
First, thanks to all for disparate views ... it's a good comment thread that gets those.
Second, I think we need to make sure we don't equate "fact-checking" with "showing a subject the entire piece." I see some suggestions the two are identical - I don't think they are, and I think Dirk DeYoung's concerns are valid, especially the ones about "other sources."
(I also have concerns about "pre-buttals" stealing thunder; those can't be avoided if a subject knows what you are writing...
Fellas, Jim S. used the [sic] version of you're to show how stupid commenters are. I'm just riffing off his [sic], which was the one part of his column I liked.
Works for University of Minnesota president Kaler as a speechwriter.
Were the reforms a success, or just reforms-for-reforms sake?