Most Commented
-
40 comments
-
24 comments
-
22 comments
-
19 comments
-
18 comments
MinnPost is a nonprofit, nonpartisan enterprise whose mission is to provide high-quality journalism for news-intense people who care about Minnesota.
Donations and pledges totaling $25,000 or more have been made by each of the families and foundations listed. For a list of all donors by category, see our most recent Year End Report.
When thinking about Obamacare, it's important to understand that Republicans didn't oppose it because of any fundamental objection to it's principles, Rather Republicans opposed it because it was proposed by President Obama. And the result is that Republicans have gotten a Republican health care plan, the defects of which can be blamed on the other party, and the benefits of which, I have no doubt, they will somehow find a way to claim responsibility for.
The problem with this article is that it pretends to come to grips with the issues, while carefully avoiding them. The problem we have isn't with entitlements, that's only a symptom. The problem is that our population is growing older and way too few commentators really want to deal with that in explicit terms, preferring the convenient euphemism, "entitlement reform".
The fact is, in his first term, President Obama went way out on a limb in dealing with these issues. He is blamed,...
Wouldn't it be better to get the stadium financing in order before we start handing out contracts?
It would make an already complicated system even more complex
Possibly, but I don't care. If I receive a tax rebate, I don't really mind if it came through a complicated process. The simplest thing is not to have one.
It would create new tax inequities.
Any change in tax policy creates new tax inequities. Dornfeld argues here that poorer outstate residents, would see their already low tax bills lowered. And he complains that the rich would a benefit they don't need. So...
"Sabo told me he was well aware of the arguments coming from the left that – because of the enormous concentration of wealth at the top that has occurred over recent decades – the solution to all fiscal problems is to keep raising taxes on the wealthy. "
Is that really the argument tha comes from the left? I like to think that I am as lefty as anyone, and I don't think the answer to all problems is to keep raising taxes on the wealthy. Crazed ideologue that I am, I am pretty much...
Think of it as a down payment. Mr. Lew now knows a bit about the vast riches that await him once he leaves office, assuming that he does what the financial institutions want him to do.
I wouldn't automatically assume the electoral vote changes are either legal or constitutional. You can gin up legal and constitutional arguments against or for just about anything. Nobody at the outset though there was any constitutional problem with Obamacare, yet opponents were able to craft constitutional arguments against that received the support of four Supreme Court justices.
In saying "nobody" I was engaging in a little message board hyperbole, of course; there is always someone out there who believes something. But in the case of Obamacare, it's supposedly objectionable features were taken from Republican proposals and were enacted in Massachusetts, where any constitutional problems went undetected. There is no doubt in my mind, that had the same proposals been enacted under a Republican president, the Supreme Court would have decided the issue 9 to zero in it'...
I have never understood why gamblers would prefer a form of gambling, the profits of which go to a private business and not a charity.
I am not a gambler myself, and quite frankly not knowledgeable about gambling. I generally view it as a surtax on stupidity, and in policy terms, that particular model works quite well. But as I understand it, gamblers have a choice here. They can gamble in ways that benefit a private profit making business, or in ways where that same money can be used to benefit may a local kids hockey team. All other things being equal, if they are, why would anyone the former rather than latter...