Most Commented
-
30 comments
-
27 comments
-
26 comments
-
24 comments
-
22 comments
MinnPost is a nonprofit, nonpartisan enterprise whose mission is to provide high-quality journalism for news-intense people who care about Minnesota.
Donations and pledges totaling $25,000 or more have been made by each of the families and foundations listed. For a list of all donors by category, see our most recent Year End Report.
..it's the NRA that gives reasonable people who own firearms a bad name.
...Remember when T-Paw had free rein to ignore the DFL? Remember what's happening in Wisconsin? It's payback time. If I were the Repubs, I wouldn't bother holding elections, or even showing up at the capitol for that matter. They should be completely and utterly ignored.
"debt & spending...mortgaged our future...tax & spend". Ron, you don't need to watch the president to identify an ideologue, just look in the mirror.
where is a link where I can read about the Onion's takeover of Powerline?
I crafted my own response..."I consider any state regulation on speeding or drinking while driving while passing through Pine County to be illegal and I would refuse to abide by it". And hey! it only took me 30 seconds to craft my response, not 30 days.
hey Minnpost, you should lobby the Powers That Be to see if they could bring an NHL franchise to Minnesota. Then you might have something other than the NBA to include in your "Sports?" section.
Ellison comments on the number of innocent civilians killed by drones and that it's unacceptable. Compared to what? How do those numbers compare to using ground forces? How do they compare to the initial "shock & awe" bombings in the Gulf Wars. Until Ellison makes that case, his argument is essentially "innocents die in war". Really? Gee, thanks Keith. Care to tell us anything else we've known for decades?
How does Mark Rotenberg keep his job? Off the top of my head, he completely blew the Jimmy Williams/Tubby Smith case. How this guy keeps his job is, in and of itself, worthy of investigation.
Maybe it was asked inartfully, but it's a valid question.
.....your proof for this would be what, exactly? Did you poll everyone voting against the amendment? The reasons people voted against it could be any of the 3 reasons you listed, or numerous others. I, for one, voted against it for the 2 reasons you claim were invalid. So, in summary, nice try, you're wrong.