Skip to Content

Neal Krasnoff

Minneapolis, MN
Commenter for
4 years 18 weeks

Recent Comments

Posted on 02/21/12 at 12:10 am in response to Pat Reusse calls stadium plan 'sensible,' 'doable'

could always volunteer to fork over his money to a billionaire sports team owner.

Not with *my* money you don't.

Posted on 02/20/12 at 04:49 pm in response to Minneapolis Council Member Don Samuels explains support for Rybak stadium plan

Samuels sez:

"I’m one of the 99 percent, so I don’t like the inequity of it. I’m trying to find ways, in my process of approval, to make sure the 99 percent do a little better in the process."

He's one of the "99 percent" looking out for the interests of the "99 percent" by engaging in the redistribution of money earned by the "99 percent" to a billionaire, a member of the "1 percent".

Mr. Samuels must think we're idiots.

Take a hike, Don.

Posted on 02/17/12 at 06:23 pm in response to Minneapolis redistricting group signs off on tentative new wards

Translated: affirmative action.

Posted on 02/17/12 at 12:33 am in response to Who's for (and against) voter photo ID, and why?

It's ok.

There's no voter fraud. No illegals with out of state drivers licenses transferable to Minnesota licenses that can be presented with utility bills. No acceptance of the Matricula Consular as a legal ID anywhere in this state. One illegal vote doesn't cancel a legal vote. People cannot just walk in and sign up a dozen people to vote with no verification. People just cannot sign up as many people as they want without verification even after they vote, if ever.

Nope,...

Posted on 02/17/12 at 12:35 am in response to Who's for (and against) voter photo ID, and why?

is both fiscally and morally responsible.

Posted on 02/21/12 at 09:47 pm in response to Who's for (and against) voter photo ID, and why?

if it is nullified by electoral fraud?

What good is the right to vote of 10,000 citizens if they are nullified by the fraudulent votes of 10,500?

(numbers used as a hypothetical)

Posted on 02/17/12 at 12:13 am in response to Republicans, League of Women Voters go at it over Voter ID

From their Policy statement:

"We are nonpartisan in our advocacy, though we are political in the sense that we seek to affect the outcome of legislation or policy."

That's talking out of both sides of their mouths.

From Program for Action 2011-2013:

"Public Policy on Reproductive Choices...Protect the constitutional right of privacy of the individual to make reproductive choices." (Page 1) (Ed. Note: "reproductive choices" is a euphemism for fetal homicides.)...

Posted on 02/18/12 at 09:33 pm in response to Republicans, League of Women Voters go at it over Voter ID

does not convince you. I cite fact and you deny its existence.

There's no point in this. Ever.

Posted on 02/18/12 at 09:28 pm in response to How the Prop 8 ruling could affect Minnesota’s proposed marriage amendment

"The federal appeals court did not opine on whether gays and lesbians have an inalienable right to marry. Unlike Minnesotans, before their constitution was amended, Californians had same-sex marriage rights — rights voters had no legitimate reason to strip them of."

Same sex marriage is an artificial construct. It has no basis in American jurisprudence or culture. It is made up, a fraud. Judges declare the fraud to be true, and create a right. The People, as sovereign, checks the...

Posted on 12/20/11 at 01:35 pm in response to MinnPost reaches 75,000 comments -- a good time to review the rules

"User comments may be included or excluded at our discretion."

Then why bother with the rest of the rules if the comments are subject to arbitrary inclusion or exclusion based upon the political bias of the moderators?

Case in point: moderators will allow the inclusion of an obvious anti-Semitic canard and exclude a comment identifying what it is.

I realize that conservatives and non-progs want to give echo chambers a good counterargument to the collectivists, anti-...