Denier is a label that lets you criticize without analysis of what you attack. It saves a lot of reading effort and the making of hard choices. Let's be specific about an action plan, instead of trashing others with some excerpts from Wikipedia.

To understand my qualifications, you need to take one of the classes I teach for the U of MN LIfelong Learning program. I also have a tour coming of the Riverside power plant on June 19.
In my letter, I rely on Stanford's Nobel physicist, who is after my time at Stanford.
You can also google my unique name and read copies of my writings for the Star Tribune, the Oil and Gas Journal, etc.
But let's talk on the issues. Be specific. I know the truth hurts.
REW

The hockey illustration has nothing to do with cooking people. It illustrates that one part CO2 is matched by 2,499 parts of nitrogen, oxygen, argon, etc in the atmosphere. And every one of the Four IPCC Assessments has overestimated the degree of global warming to date.
As to qualifications, I don't have to prove myself to you or any one else on this board. My facts and figures speak for themselves. Even Jim Hansen admits to the pause in global temperature rise.

In it we all express opinions and try support them with facts. I know it is difficult for some of you see long held views challenged by an unwelcome messenger. Attacking the messenger is a frequent response when facts and data are short. Fire away.