Skip to Content

Steven Prince

Minneapolis, Minnesota
Commenter for
1 year 5 weeks

Recent Comments

Posted on 01/16/13 at 01:46 pm in response to ‘Zero Dark Thirty’: Separating the facts from Hollywood fiction

This commentary tells a truth that many still pretend is a question for debate: the United States used torture as part of national policy after 9/11. What the commentary doesn't tell is the legal implications of this truth: the activities were illegal as a matter of international law and U.S. treaty obligations. For that reason it is naive to think the report discussed will be released in any form that is not highly redacted. The U.S. government has not prosecuted any of the criminals...

Posted on 12/13/12 at 11:06 am in response to Minneapolis likes Southwest light rail concept but not the current plan

I challenge anyone to go walk around the proposed Mpls rail stop locations on the SW Alignment and conclude that the Kenilworth route makes any sense for the City. The only stop with development potential (near Calhoon Village on Lake) would also exist on the Greenway/Nicollet alignment. This is not news, some will argue the City had little choice in a County driven project, But that doesn't excuse the City's planners for recommending Kenilworth over the Greenway/Nicollet alignment.

...
Posted on 10/23/12 at 09:46 am in response to Ellison, Fields get personal in debate

Not a shining moment for either debater, it reminded me of a Saturday Night Live sketch. Perhaps Minnesota lexicographer Chirs Kluwe should have the last word (with his defense of calling out four NFL stars for putting their own interests ahead of the other players):

"P.S. I respect all four of the people I called douchebags (Manning, Brees, Mankins,
and Jackson). That's why I used the word 'douchebag' instead of 'asshole' or 'fuckwit.'
Someone acting...

Posted on 10/16/12 at 11:21 am in response to What to do with Block E? Thinking outside the cubicle

Block E's failure was predictable at the outset. San Martin and Dewar correctly repeat what many said at the time Block E was built: it fails to serve any urban function in an important central location. The suburban mall mix of tenants was noted as proof that the building as designed was a failure before it opened.

Instead of driving around it, I suggest you get out and walk. The building is a fortress, with few openings to allow interactions with either skyway or street level...

Posted on 10/09/12 at 11:58 am in response to Poll shows opposition gaining on both gay marriage and Voter ID

Lynne,

Not all Christian faiths agree with you, and not everyone is Christian. Some religions buy the notion of sin, many focus instead on our personal dealings with each other, instead of our obligations to God.

I believe the state should leave definitions of marriage to our clergy and congregations, why exactly do you believe our Constitution should limit my freedom to practice my religion in a way consistent with my community's views and values?

There is no...

Posted on 10/03/12 at 10:11 am in response to Some appealing features of a parliamentary system

A less desirable feature of parliamentary governments, particularly in countries with fragmented social or religious groups (sound familier?) are coalition governments. When no party has a clear majority, a ruling coalition has to be put together - often resulting in outsized influence for small radical groups. Do we really want Michelle Bachman or Todd Aken calling the shots because they control some small block of congressional votes?

Posted on 10/02/12 at 10:56 am in response to Southwest LRT: ‘We Can't Wait’ — but we will

I think this map is years old, showing three different alignments that were considered in Minneapolis. There is no plan to build LRT along the lines shown in orange or blue (or the green line east of 35W).

HEre is a map from the Metro Council showing the planned route: http://www.metrocouncil.org/transportation/SW/SWLRTmap600.png

Posted on 09/25/12 at 10:20 am in response to Who will control the 2013 Minnesota Legislature?

An important but rarely discussed factor in the Republican takeover of the legislature was direct mail by outside Republican groups that targeted voters in specific districts. The mailings were not sophisticated, but very inexpensive (compared to media buys). Since it seemed to work last time, why wouldn't it be used again? Generic TV ads are more expensive and less targeted then direct mailings for specific legislative races.

Posted on 08/14/12 at 03:03 pm in response to Cases of voter-ID election fraud found 'virtually non-existent'

So you want the law because it will prevent Democrats from casting ballots. An honest answer.

Posted on 08/14/12 at 03:10 pm in response to Cases of voter-ID election fraud found 'virtually non-existent'

Another honest answer: It is not about fraud, but it is about stopping the "less educated" and "less involved" from voting. We really should call this what it is: "The Voter Suppression Amendment."