Most Commented
-
30 comments
-
26 comments
-
26 comments
-
23 comments
-
21 comments
MinnPost is a nonprofit, nonpartisan enterprise whose mission is to provide high-quality journalism for news-intense people who care about Minnesota.
Donations and pledges totaling $25,000 or more have been made by each of the families and foundations listed. For a list of all donors by category, see our most recent Year End Report.
For the record: I'm not a Dr.--not even a PhD one.
Also: I never consider the sponsor of this blog when I choose topics to write about. In fact, I've never had a conversation with anyone at UCare. I don't know what they think of the opinions I express in this blog, and, frankly, I don't care. I wouldn't have signed on to write this blog if I had been put under any constraints by the sponsor.
This is a blog, so I'm free to state my opinions, and I do so from time to time. I do...
Bud and Hal,
As I state in my post, it's not the obligation of the film to depict current knowledge about stuttering. I certainly don't expect any film set in an historical context to explain modern approaches to medicine.
But I believe, based on conversations I've been part of, that people still believe in the outdated notion that childhood trauma or other stressors are a major cause of stuttering. That's why I decided to highlight Preston's essay and the recent research from...
Ouch. Now I wish I had watched it.
You're correct, Stephen, and if you've read this column for any length of time, you know that I, too, dislike "sizzle" over science.
I've changed my lede to a passive verb.
Susan L.: I don't know the answer to your question, but I believe the report said thermal paper has been around for 50 years.
Sue H.: Both spellings are accepted, although the one you prefer is probably most common. I've changed the spelling in the story to yours so as not to distract other readers.
Thanks for your kind words about the column (and your diligent copyediting).
Bill:
I am highly skeptical of every medical study I read. I'm not going to stop reporting on such studies, as their publication is news. But I try to point out the limitations of the research--and conflicts of interest. Financial conflicts of interest have become a huge, huge problem in medical research--and in medical practice.
I believe that in a hundred years, people will look upon this time in medicine as we look upon the medicine of the 19th century--woefully inadequate...
Can we persuade you to play the accordion at a MinnPost event, Pamela? Tickets would go fast.
Gail:
I skimmed through that website you mentioned. I found a lot of medical nonsense on it.
The idea of menopausal "symptoms" is a huge part of the problem. Menopause is not an illness, despite what the makers of various drugs, supplements, and other treatments want women to think. Furthermore, most of the "symptoms" attributed to it on that website (and elsewhere) have nothing to do with menopause.
Ah, Paul, but if you only knew how much ice cream I ate.
Bernice:
As the editorial that accompanied this study notes (see my second-to-last paragraph), there is no good evidence (evidence without reporting bias) that taking calcium plus vitamin D reduces fractures. And that's the endpoint that matters.