SERVING MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL / MINNESOTA

MinnPost.com Job Listing of the Day!
MinnPost.com Job Listing of the Day!

Browse
Minnesota Jobs
Direct from Company Websites!

Unadvertised,
Current,
Highest-quality

Start Searching Now!

 







 

From the Christian Science Monitor News Service
  • Switch to Small Text Size
  • Switch to Medium Text Size
  • Switch to Large Text Size
Recommend to a friend Print Submit a Comment

    Senate health-care bill revives public option. But can it pass?

    By Peter Grier | Published Tue, Oct 27 2009 9:22 am

    WASHINGTON — A public option in health care may be OK with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. But it has yet to pass muster with a more important audience: the full Senate itself.

    Senator Reid announced Monday that he will send to the Senate floor a health-care-reform bill that includes the option government-run insurance plan - though states could opt out if they wished. Yet all indications are that the Nevada Democrat remains just short of the crucial threshold of 60 votes needed to defeat a likely Republican filibuster.

    Asked flatly on Monday whether he had those votes in hand, which would enable him to shut off debate and move to a final vote, he punted.

    “We’ve been working on health care, as a Democratic Party - and much of the time we had Republicans helping us - since 1948,” said Reid at a press conference. “We’ve made significant progress these past months.”

    The reality is that a number of different versions of a public option may come up for a vote during full Senate debate on a health-care reform bill.

    Under the version backed Monday by Reid, states would have a year following the 2013 phase-in of the new health-care plan to decide whether to opt out of the public option.

    That opt-out clause might soften the opposition to the public option among some conservative Democrats, such as Sen. Mary Landrieu of Louisiana. But as it stands now, Reid’s version of the public option likely has lost the vote of Sen. Olympia Snowe (R) of Maine.

    Senator Snowe voted to approve the Senate Finance Committee health reform bill, which did not contain a public option. Instead, it contained a provision, suggested by Snowe, that would trigger a public option if private insurance firms did not hit certain cost-containment goals.

    “I would not be surprised one bit if Reid has to reverse course over the next few days and reintroduce the plan with a ‘Snowe-trigger’ rather than the ‘Reid opt-out,’ ” says Jordan Sekulow, a political analyst and director of international operations at the American Center for Law and Justice. “Neither liberals nor conservatives seem pleased with Reid’s proposal.”

    Sen. Tom Harkin (D) of Iowa, chairman of the Senate Health committee, has said that there are 52 firm votes in favor of the public option in the Democratic caucus and five or so opposed.

    On Monday, Senator Harkin issued a statement praising Reid’s inclusion of the public option.

    “There is strong support among Senate Democrats and around the country to improve access and affordability and an effective public option can achieve,” said Harkin.

    Still, 52 Democratic votes will not get a health-care bill through the full Senate. Reid has to convince all Democrats (and the Senate’s two independents) to vote as one if he is to push through a bill with no GOP votes.

    That would only be to shut off debate, however. It is possible that some Democrats would vote to end talking and move to a final showdown - and then vote against the legislation itself.

    “While all the rumblings indicate that Reid is still short two to three votes, the majority leader is betting that moderate Senate Democrats who oppose this version of the public option will still vote to invoke cloture and then later vote against the Senate bill,” says Mr. Sekulow of the ACLJ in an e-mail.

    Like what you just read? Support high-quality journalism in Minnesota by becoming a member of MinnPost.

    Advertisement:

    0 Comments: Hide/Show Comments

    0 Comment: Hide/Show Comment

    0 Comments:

    E-mail address

    Password

     

    Forgot Password? | Register to Comment

    MinnPost does not permit the use of foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that may be libelous or interpreted as inciting hate or sexual harassment. User comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure that comments meet these standards and adhere to MinnPost's terms of use and privacy policy.

    We intend for this area to be used by our readers as a place for civil, thought-provoking and high-quality public discussion. In order to achieve this, MinnPost requires that all commenters register and post comments with their actual names and place of residence. Register here to comment.





    The Christian Science Monitor is an award-winning international news organization that covers news and feature stories from every corner of the globe. Founded in 1908 by Mary Baker Eddy, the Monitor publishes news around-the-clock on the Web at CSMonitor.com.

    Recent stories from the Christian Science Monitor