SERVING MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL / MINNESOTA

MinnPost.com Job Listing of the Day!
MinnPost.com Job Listing of the Day!

Browse
Minnesota Jobs
Direct from Company Websites!

Unadvertised,
Current,
Highest-quality

Start Searching Now!

 







 

From the Christian Science Monitor News Service
  • Switch to Small Text Size
  • Switch to Medium Text Size
  • Switch to Large Text Size
Recommend to a friend Print Submit a Comment

    Wayward pilots' licenses revoked, but larger questions remain

    By Mark Trumbull | Published Wed, Oct 28 2009 8:45 am

    These two pilots flew a bit too far beyond the boundaries of federal standards. At least 150 miles too far.

    That's the message delivered Tuesday as the Federal Aviation Administration revoked the licenses of the Northwest Airlines pilots who made national headlines for overshooting the Minneapolis airport.

    They said they were distracted while using laptop computers during a discussion about a new flight-crew scheduling system.

    But the FAA didn't take much time deciding that the crew's actions were essentially a firing offense.

    "The pilots were out of contact with air traffic controllers for an extended period of time," the FAA said in a statement explaining its action. "Air traffic controllers and airline officials repeatedly tried to reach them through radio and data contact, without success."

    The pilots, the agency said, violated a number of regulations, including "operating carelessly and recklessly."

    The use of laptops in the cockpit also violated a company policy.

    The FAA's announcement answers one big question - what discipline the pilots might face. The two Northwest employees have 10 days in which to appeal the revocation of their licenses, the agency said.

    But other questions surrounding the Oct. 21 flight linger for the industry and for the federal government:

    • Do cockpits need better monitoring, including possibly audio or video recorders that go throughout a flight? Northwest Flight 188 had an older-model voice recorder that provides just 30 minutes of audio, from the end of the flight.
    • Are better alarm systems needed to warn commercial pilots who have strayed from their flight plan? It's not yet clear why the pilots missed attempts by traffic controllers and others to reach them. According to the National Transportation Safety Board, the pilots said they were not aware of the airplane's position until a flight attendant called about five minutes before they were scheduled to land and asked what their estimated time of arrival was. The pilots also told the NTSB that they were using cockpit speakers to listen to radio communications, not their headsets.
    • Does communication between flight controllers and the US military need improvement? According to news reports, military jets were preparing to intercept the flight when the Northwest pilots restored radio contact with traffic controllers, but the jets had not yet left the runway. It's possible that, despite concerns that the plane could have been hijacked, traffic controllers were slow to contact the North American Aerospace Defense Command.
    • Were the pilots truthful during a five-hour process of answering questions from investigators at the National Transportation Safety Board? The investigators declined to seize the laptop computers used on the flight, an NTSB spokesman told the Associated Press Tuesday. A review of the computers might turn up evidence corroborating the pilots' story.

    Flying while distracted?
    For more on the Northwest pilots' use of laptops, click here.

    Like what you just read? Support high-quality journalism in Minnesota by becoming a member of MinnPost.

    Advertisement:

    0 Comments: Hide/Show Comments

    0 Comment: Hide/Show Comment

    0 Comments:

    E-mail address

    Password

     

    Forgot Password? | Register to Comment

    MinnPost does not permit the use of foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that may be libelous or interpreted as inciting hate or sexual harassment. User comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure that comments meet these standards and adhere to MinnPost's terms of use and privacy policy.

    We intend for this area to be used by our readers as a place for civil, thought-provoking and high-quality public discussion. In order to achieve this, MinnPost requires that all commenters register and post comments with their actual names and place of residence. Register here to comment.





    The Christian Science Monitor is an award-winning international news organization that covers news and feature stories from every corner of the globe. Founded in 1908 by Mary Baker Eddy, the Monitor publishes news around-the-clock on the Web at CSMonitor.com.

    Recent stories from the Christian Science Monitor