
Our major sponsors
Sponsor of
Second Opinion
Sponsor of
Community Sketchbook
Our major advertisers
Our in-kind partners

MinnPost thanks these generous donors:
INDIVIDUALS AND FOUNDATI0NS
Blandin Foundation
Otto Bremer Foundation
Bush Foundation
Sage & John Cowles
David & Vicki Cox
Toby & Mae Dayton
Jack & Claire Dempsey
Ethics and Excellence in Journalism Foundation
Sam & Stacey Heins
John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
Joel & Laurie Kramer
Lee Lynch & Terry Saario
Martin & Brown Foundation
The McKnight Foundation
The Minneapolis Foundation
The Saint Paul Foundation
Rebecca & Mark Shavlik
(See all donors here.)
By Amanda Paulson | Published Wed, Nov 25 2009 9:50 am
In general, parents shopping for children this holiday season can be confident that toys on the shelves are safer than they have been in the past.
The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) has had 38 toy recalls this year, down from 162 in 2008 and 148 in 2007, when 45 million toys were recalled and the public demanded stronger laws and better enforcement.
But not all toys on shelves are safe, and parents still need to be vigilant.
"We are seeing progress, but there's no magic wand you can wave to improve the CPSC overnight," says Elizabeth Hitchcock, a public-health advocate with US PIRG (Public Interest Research Group), which released its 24th "Trouble in Toyland" report on Tuesday. It's the group's first such report since Congress strengthened regulations on toy safety.
The report, which lists some unsafe toys being sold, focuses on three still-problematic areas: choking hazards, noise level, and lead and phthalate (chemical substances added to plastics) content.
It credits much of the progress being made to the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act passed in August 2008, which strengthened the CPSC and toughened regulations against hazards like lead and phthalates. The current standard for acceptable lead content in paint on children's toys is 90 parts per million - much lower than the 600 parts per million that was allowed a year ago. (The overall limit for lead content in children's toys - previously unregulated - is 300 parts per million.)
"The new safety rules are on the side of the consumer and children," CPSC chairman Inez Tenenbaum told reporters Monday, citing the new lead and phthalate restrictions as well as new independent testing standards.
At the same time, she urged parents to pay attention to labeling and age suggestions for toys.
"These are safety standards. They're not cognitive ability. When it says 3 to 5, that deals with the safety of your child," Ms. Tenenbaum said.
Even with the new regulations, PIRG found a number of toys for sale that don't comply with the standards - for example, that aren't labeled properly for choking hazards or have noise levels exceeding the acceptable limit. One cloth book that the organization tested had lead levels in the paint at 1,900 parts per million. An Elmo lunch bag had a banned phthalate at a 7.2 percent concentration level.
US PIRG also unveiled a new tool Tuesday for parents to use with hand-held smart phones. It allows them to scan a list of toys the organization found that weren't safe, as well as to review basic safety steps to avoid hazards. Consumers can also report any products that are unsafe.
The list of unsafe toys isn't comprehensive, Ms. Hitchcock notes, but she hopes it provides a useful starting place for getting people to think about safety.
Some of it may come down to common sense.
"People need to think about how their kid is going to play with a toy - take it apart, see if there are small parts," Hitchcock says.
For parents, the recalls and discoveries of unsafe toys still sold in stores can seem like a constant lurking danger. But Hitchcock offers some suggestions for how to shop safely:
Like what you just read? Support high-quality journalism in Minnesota by becoming a member of MinnPost.
0 Comments:
Forgot Password? | Register to Comment
MinnPost does not permit the use of foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that may be libelous or interpreted as inciting hate or sexual harassment. User comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure that comments meet these standards and adhere to MinnPost's terms of use and privacy policy.
We intend for this area to be used by our readers as a place for civil, thought-provoking and high-quality public discussion. In order to achieve this, MinnPost requires that all commenters register and post comments with their actual names and place of residence. Register here to comment.