
Our major sponsors
Sponsor of
Second Opinion
Sponsor of
Community Sketchbook
Our major advertisers
Our in-kind partners

MinnPost thanks these generous donors:
INDIVIDUALS AND FOUNDATI0NS
Blandin Foundation
Otto Bremer Foundation
Bush Foundation
Sage & John Cowles
David & Vicki Cox
Toby & Mae Dayton
Jack & Claire Dempsey
Ethics and Excellence in Journalism Foundation
Sam & Stacey Heins
John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
Joel & Laurie Kramer
Lee Lynch & Terry Saario
Martin & Brown Foundation
The McKnight Foundation
The Minneapolis Foundation
The Saint Paul Foundation
Rebecca & Mark Shavlik
(See all donors here.)
By Mark Clayton | Published Fri, Mar 19 2010 8:36 am

A US-led plan to stop international trophy hunting of the polar bear and a flourishing trade in polar bear parts was defeated Thursday at a meeting of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) in Doha, Qatar.
It was the second major defeat of the day for the United States - including a sudden vote and refusal by the 175-nation CITES group to ban international trade in Atlantic bluefin tuna, which is a popular sushi dish worldwide, but especially in Japan.
But while the tuna defeat was a major blow - because the decline was so obvious, and reversing trade it in would so obviously help - US officials said the polar defeat was just a first step.
"It's not uncommon that the first effort to list a species is not success," Tom Strickland, assistant secretary of the Interior for Fish and Wildlife and Parks told reporters in a teleconference. "It requires a sustained effort. ... So while we are disappointed with the votes today ... we are heartened by the support around world to up-list the polar bear and bluefin tuna."
For the polar bear, he said, the problem is that their 200,000 square miles of designated "critical habitat" in the US is mostly sea ice that is rapidly melting. That effect of climate change harms the bears' populations. But trophy hunting and the trade in bear parts puts "great pressure" on the bears, Mr. Strickland said.
Among some environmentalists, there was a bit less disappoint about the polar bear defeat. CITES, they noted, is a conference that is about protecting animals through prohibiting trade - and protecting polar bears was considered a steep hurdle because their primary threat is climate change.
But for some environmentalists the defeat stung.
“While there has been a lot of positive momentum in polar bear conservation recently, this is a real setback,” says Andrew Wetzler, director of the Natural Resources Defense Council's Wildlife Conservation Project. “It keeps some the most important populations of polar bears squarely in the cross hairs."
Polar bear populations worldwide will decline by more than 70 percent in the next 45 years as global warming melts their habitat, the US Geological Survey estimated in 2007. The US listed the polar bear as threatened under the Endangered Species Act in 2008.
Canada, which still allows 300 polar bears a year to be hunted for international trade and trophy hunting despite signs of population pressures, strongly opposed the US-led measure.
Like what you just read? Support high-quality journalism in Minnesota by becoming a member of MinnPost.
3 Comments: Hide/Show Comments
Forgot Password? | Register to Comment
MinnPost does not permit the use of foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that may be libelous or interpreted as inciting hate or sexual harassment. User comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure that comments meet these standards and adhere to MinnPost's terms of use and privacy policy.
We intend for this area to be used by our readers as a place for civil, thought-provoking and high-quality public discussion. In order to achieve this, MinnPost requires that all commenters register and post comments with their actual names and place of residence. Register here to comment.