Jefferson Morley finds the roots of American politics in an 1835 snowstorm

Jefferson Morley
Jefferson Morley

In 2009, the motorcade of newly inaugurated President Barack Obama stopped at the corner of Pennsylvania Avenue and Sixth Street in Washington, and the president stepped out to walk among the cheering crowd. It was a remarkable moment for so many reasons, but perhaps only one person watching understood the significance of that particular corner.

In the 1830s, a business called the Epicurean Eating House stood on that spot. It was the first restaurant in the young Washington City, and one of the first in the United States. It had an elegantly appointed dining room, and a menu stocked with delicacies such as oysters, green turtle soup and West Indian jellies. And it was owned by a successful, intelligent, well-liked and free mixed-race black man named Beverly Snow, who mingled with the most powerful white men of the day.

“I had gone down to watch the speech earlier in the day, then on the way back, I stopped to watch the motorcade on a TV in a store. When they stopped at that corner, I said, ‘Yes! That’s where the restaurant was!’ Nobody knew that, Obama didn’t know that story, but I knew it so well,” said Jefferson Morley, who was then finishing work on his book, “Snow-Storm in August: Washington City, Francis Scott Key, and the Forgotten Race Riot of 1835,” out now.

In 2005, as a reporter for the Washington Post, Morley had written a story about a historic preservation dispute involving a house from the 19th century.

“I started reading about the history of Washington to understand the story,” Morley said in an interview on Wednesday, “and I noted two very interesting things: There had been a race riot there in 1835, and the district attorney of the city of Washington at the time was Francis Scott Key, who wrote ‘The Star-Spangled Banner.’ I asked around the newsroom, and no one knew about this. I realized there was a story there. What I discovered after writing the article was a much richer, deeper, more complicated and dramatic story than I ever expected.”

Three main figures emerged

Morley delved into Washington’s National Archives and sifted through court dockets, tax records, newspapers and diaries, and three people rose to the surface. Key, who held a much greater influence over the lives of his neighbors than is generally recognized today; Beverly Snow, who was part of a vibrant and successful community of free black people in a city that was also teeming with slave traders; and Arthur Bowen, a mixed-race young slave who very likely was the son of his owner, Dr. William Thornton, who designed the U.S. Capitol building and many other landmarks in Washington. In August 1835, these three were swept together in events that culminated in a riot, as a destructive band of white men rampaged across the city in a night that set the stage for the Civil War.

Snow Storm in August“I was determined to illuminate this very important moment in American history, but I wanted it to read like a novel, not read like a textbook, like synthesized history,” says Morley, who unfolds the tale with direct quotes taken from diaries and newspapers of the day. It’s an engaging, often riveting read.

Morley, whose father, Tony Morley, was an editorial writer at the Star Tribune in the 1980s, grew up in Dinkytown and attended Marshall High School in the 1970s, where his future as a writer came into focus.

Influenced by Paul Gruchow

“I was very lucky to fall under the influence of a great writer, Paul Gruchow. He was running a magazine for students at Marshall, and I worked with him there, and later went to work for him at the Worthington Daily Globe. It was my first journalism job,” says Morley, who went on to write for the Washington Post, New Republic, The Nation, Harper’s Magazine, and the Minnesota Independent, among other publications. “Having Paul Gruchow as a mentor was incredibly important. He was so thoughtful, encouraging, a very good editor, and he pushed me to be a writer.”

Morley has now left journalism to focus on writing books on American history. His first book was “Our Man in Mexico: Winston Scott and the Hidden History of the CIA,” and he is working on a third, about the CIA’s activities surrounding JFK’s assassination, due out next year for the 50th anniversary of those events.

Forgotten history

“So often, what we know about figures in history does not reflect the realities of their times, or has been reshaped by future perspectives. There is a monument to Francis Scott Key in Washington and it says, ‘He was active in the anti-slavery cause.’ But in reality, he was active in suppressing the anti-slavery cause. We don’t want to teach that to our kids and remember it as a society, but that is our history. We should know it and teach it,” he says.

“The reality is important, because it shaped our country and helps us understand our society today. That’s why [the events of 1835] were so fascinating. To me, the individual movement for American freedom starts right here, with lawless white rioters rampaging over the success of free black people. This is the struggle that will culminate in the Civil War in 30 years. Here we see our country taking shape, the red-blue dynamics that we see in our politics today arose in those days over the right to own people, and the features of that conflict are still with us.

“We see that in the backlash against Obama and the persistence of hostility towards successful black men. There is this ingrained hostility to African-American aspiration that goes back to Beverly Snow and his restaurant. Today, maybe 1,000 restaurants in Washington are black-owned. But the issues that arose in those days continues to influence society and politics, and they haven’t been resolved, in part because we have forgotten this part of our history.” 

Comments (3)

  1. Submitted by Dennis Tester on 08/16/2012 - 11:15 am.

    Oh please

    “We see that in the backlash against Obama and the persistence of hostility towards successful black men.”

    I hope you were thinking of Herman Cain or Allen West in that sentence.

    “There is this ingrained hostility to African-American aspiration that goes back to Beverly Snow and his restaurant.”

    Nonsense. The backlash against Obama is because of his leftist ideology and it’s coming from those who would rather live in a free society than one controlled by government. It’s kind of ironic that a black man would be so insensitive to people who just want to be free.

    The hostility towards men like Herman Cain and Col. Allen West is from the Left because they are successful black men and conservatives.

    • Submitted by RB Holbrook on 08/16/2012 - 04:18 pm.

      Racism?

      Let me see: Reflexive opposition to anything and everything President Obama does is not based, in any way, on racism. The conspiracy theory surrounding his birthplace was just a legitimate concern being raised. Check.

      On the other hand, all opposition to Herman Cain’s candidacy or to Rep. (not Colonel. Again: read the Constitution) West must be based on racism. It can’t have anything to do with a presidential wannabe who doesn’t know anything about burning foreign policy issues, or who sticks to an incredibly simplistic economic dogma. As far as Rep. West, the opposition to him couldn’t be based on his many inflammatory remarks. No, conservative black men may never judged on their policies.

      Give me a break.

  2. Submitted by Karen Sandness on 08/16/2012 - 06:06 pm.

    Anyone who looks objectively at the evidence and thinks that Barack Obama is a “leftist,” much less a “socialist” or a “Marxist,” must be guided by something other than the evidence.

    A real leftist would not have agreed to follow G.W. Bush’s plan to bail out the banks with no strings attached.

    A real leftist would have at the very least placed stringent conditions on the bailout, including firing of the top officials, a ban on bonuses until the banks were solvent, and requirements to lend to small businesses and deal honestly with distressed homeowners.

    A real leftist would not have adopted Mitt Romney’s Massachusetts Health Plan for the nation, refused to hear the pleas of those who wanted a single-payer system, and forced the Progressive Caucus to give in to the Blue Dogs instead of the other way around.

    A real leftist would have started by insisting on a single-payer system and would have drawn the line in the sand at giving people a public option.

    A real leftist would not have continued the Patriot Act, agreed to an extension of the Bush tax cuts for millionaires, expanded the war in Afghanistan, put out hits on American citizens, expanded “free” trade agreements with Third World countries, forced the auto workers unions to make concessions (unlike the banks), had the Justice Department help coordinate actions against Occupy Wall Street by urban mayors, or appointed avowed proponents of privatizing Social Security and Medicare to his deficit commission.

    I know a lot of genuine leftists, ranging from Democratic Socialists to outright Communists, and not one of them considers Obama a “comrade.” There are at least two real leftists running for president that I know of, but neither of them, neither the Green Party nor the Socialist Party U.S.A.’s candidate is named “Obama.” Some of my leftist friends are so disgusted by Obama’s policies that they have been planning to vote for one of the minor party candidates.

    However, the number of leftists I know who plan to vote for a minor party candidate has shrunk in recent days, due to Romney’s selection of Paul Ryan as his running mate.

    Sadly, the American electorate this time is faced with a choice between a team consisting of Nixon-style conservatives and a team consisting of a corporate raider who can’t remember his own positions from one day to the next and a math-challenged right-wing fanatic.

    Right-wing propagandists know that it’s no longer cool to use racial epithets, so instead, they tell their more gullible devotees that Obama is a “Muslim” (who attended a liberal Christian church), was born in Kenya (despite a birth certificate authenticated by the State of Hawaii and no proof that his mother was ever in Kenya), and is a citizen of Indonesia. Then the devotees go into online forums and use all the racial slurs that the more sophisticated right-wingers refrain from.

    So how to explain Herman Cain and other African-American Republicans? Easy. The Republican establishment has no problem with African-Americans per se, as long as they are Republicans. The same is true of attitudes toward women. Jeane Kirkpatrick was treated as a wise elder stateswoman, but the even more accomplished Hillary Clinton, who is now older than Kirkpatrick was in her heyday, has spent half her life dodging rumors that she is a murderer, a witch, and every other epithet that one can toss at women.

    Another thought: If Obama’s father had been an Irish or Swedish exchange student instead of a Kenyan one, would there be any “birther” controversy?

Leave a Reply