Nonprofit, nonpartisan journalism. Supported by readers.


New Twins stadium: A fan’s-eye perspective

Last month, the Star Tribune’s Jim Souhan wrote a column extolling the new Twins ballpark.

“The best thing about the park? It’s small,” Souhan wrote. “A small footprint forced the Twins to cantilever the left field upper deck over the bleachers, so that the last row of that upper deck is now the equivalent of the first row of the Metrodome’s left field upper deck.”

That last line captured my imagination. You see, I’m a ballpark geek. For a while, I helped run Ballpark Tours, an outgrowth of the old “Save the Met” crew. We were so peeved about hermetically sealed baseball that we arranged trips to where the grass still grows and you don’t have to see a chiropractor after sitting down the third-base line.

After countless journeys, I have strong opinions about new ballparks as places to watch a ballgame. And as much as I appreciated Souhan’s sentiments, I possess a moral advantage when passing judgment: I pay for my tickets. Having been a sportswriter, I know it’s easy to go gooey when you rarely fork over your own dollars. What follows is a more detailed look at the new park, with other interesting comparisons to the Dome that Twins fans know and (mostly) loathe.

The Minnesota Twins use this postcard of the new stadium to woo potential ticket-holders.
The Minnesota Twins use this postcard of the new stadium to woo potential ticket-holders.

Any comparison between the new park and the Dome must acknowledge these specific advantages:

Legroom: The Dome’s airplane-like squeeze factor is 31 inches; the new park’s minimum is 33. The priciest lower-deck seats and the club level will have a roomy 36 or 39 inches of stretch. (Premium seats will also be wider: 20-22 inches, compared to the Dome’s 19 inches, which is also the new ballpark’s standard. Only the new left-field seats come in narrower, at 18 inches.)

Row width: One of the Dome’s major bummers; at its worst, rows are 37 seats wide, creating knee-banging journeys if you’re in a middle seat, or a lot of up-and-down at the ends. The longest row in the new park is 24 seats, and most rows are considerably shorter.

Amenities: Concourses that are twice as wide, open to the field, and allow you to circle the ballpark; plentiful bathrooms (double the Dome’s for two-thirds the seating capacity) and lots of bars and restaurants.

And of course, I also must acknowledge the stadium’s public financing: many of you remain as angry about that as my Save the Met buddies are about the Metrodome. I sympathize; I know what it feels like when all you’re left with is a boycott. Still, the new ballpark is a reality, and this is for all the fans who will step inside.

You can also learn about all our free newsletter options.

Comments (4)

  1. Submitted by Jim Koepke on 02/26/2008 - 12:31 pm.

    According to Mayor Rybak the ticket prices for this park will be almost double what the dome was. It is a stadium built for the rich and powerful and paid for mostly by the average citizens. And it sounds like the average joes paying for it won’t be able to afford to attend as many games. A real tragedy for democracy.

  2. Submitted by Dean Carlson on 02/26/2008 - 02:50 pm.

    Wow David nice job. I especially like the Dome v. new ballpark seat comparisons. That right plaza is going to be real nice too. Not sure where exactly the gate will be, but there may be some opportunities to “steal a peak” from that plaza as well.

  3. Submitted by Robert Warner on 02/26/2008 - 06:16 pm.

    Nice article. Looking forward to the new stadium. It’s about time. However, 24 seats is still too wide for a stadium row.

    Jim K: If you’re too cheap to buy a ticket then don’t go. Ticket prices are still a bargain compared to the rest of the MLB. Get over it. You can ask your buddy the Mayor if he would rather have the Stadium across the river. He can’t have it both ways.

  4. Submitted by Darren Heydanek on 02/27/2008 - 11:55 am.

    As a downtown resident, I am thrilled by this new stadium. I can’t wait for it to be open and to wander over to enjoy some sunny day baseball. I really could care less about the Twins, though I will have a game on from time to time in the summer, but I just enjoy being at outdoor baseball.

    I think the park is going to be a destination in and of itself for a few seasons, which will be a great addition. Too bad about the unsightly incinerator six feet away though.

Leave a Reply