Nonprofit, nonpartisan journalism. Supported by readers.


Economy has a way of felling stock market Goliaths

What about that great stock you just want to hang onto forever?

Steve Leuthold
Courtesy of the Leuthold Group
Steve Leuthold

What about that great stock you just want to hang onto forever? Forget it.

That’s the principal takeaway from Steve Leuthold’s latest study, on creative destruction.

Leuthold is the Minneapolis investment guru widely regarded for his mastery of securities market cycles. While the rest of us habitually focus on day-to-day gyrations in the stock market, Leuthold rivets on the long-term. Decades. Sometimes centuries.

He titles his new analysis “Are Google & Cisco Forever?” Absolutely not, he told a University of Minnesota audience last week.

Article continues after advertisement

“It is a mistake,” he warns, “to assume that the great companies of today will continue being the great companies of tomorrow.”

Economist Joseph Schumpeter advanced the idea of creative destruction, the turbulent process of replacing outmoded work with up-to-date jobs, a couple of generations ago. This constant churning keeps the economy vibrant. That’s a big plus overall. It’s also great if you’re on the creative end, but not so great if your job gets destroyed.

Leuthold and sidekick Andy Engel ranked the 100 largest U.S. companies by market value — shares outstanding times the stock price — at intervals going back to 1960. Only 11 of this year’s top 100 were on the list in 1960. Just 36 remain from the 1990 list. 3M, which ranked 12th in 1960, was 49th this year.

“I was surprised,” Leuthold says of the intensity of the churning.

Market value information was lacking before 1960, so Leuthold used assets to track changes back to 1917.

Only your great-grandfather knew about most of those 1917 companies. Ever hear of 1917’s 11th largest, International Mercantile Marine? It was the corporate parent of the Titanic.

No. 63 Cuba Cane Sugar met its demise after Fidel Castro privatized it.

Pullman, 26th in 1917, made sleeper cars. Demand waned as passenger train service withered.

Leuthold says the turbulence has been accelerating, thanks to rapidly changing technology and more acquisitions.

Article continues after advertisement

And the churning is worldwide. Leuthold distributed a recent column, by New York Times financial columnist Floyd Norris, to show how quickly the global rankings of the world’s 20 most valuable corporate titans have been changing.

Japan had 14 of the 20 juggernauts of 1989, none in 2007. The United States had 14 of the top 20 in 1999, seven in 2007. China, unrepresented on both earlier lists, had eight this year.

Could the rising turbulence affect the Twin Cities’ strong base of corporate headquarters? You betcha. So far, high-value newcomers like UnitedHealth, Medtronic and Best Buy have pretty much replaced big-hitters that have been acquired or flamed out. But Leuthold’s new study carries an unstated red flag for this region: Given all the tumult, we can’t count on retaining that headquarters base indefinitely.

What led Steve Leuthold to do this particular analysis? Years ago, his brother-in-law inherited a gob of money. The estate went into a trust, which contained just one stock. The rules said the stock couldn’t be sold.

“They said you couldn’t go wrong with that one,” Leuthold jokes. The stock was the Penn Central Railroad.