Cargill’s new logo: Why it works

I’ve always been fascinated by logos. What makes a good one? And how do you capture a company’s essence in a few letters, lines and colors?
 
In recent years, I noticed a new Cargill logo popping up. I liked it, and thought it was an interesting indication that the reclusive, Wayzata-based giant was making itself more visible to the general public.
 
So I was delighted to discover that the new identity for the world’s largest private company was created by a small branding firm only a few blocks from my office in the North Loop of downtown Minneapolis. Franke + Fiorella has been in business since 1993, and the eight-person firm has created or freshened logos and corporate identity systems for a host of well-known Twin Cities companies, including Valspar, 3M and Mosaic.

For Craig Franke, the firm’s creative director, the acid test of a good logo is simple: Would you wear it on a shirt or hat?
 
“It’s like when you meet someone and you connect immediately,” Franke said. “There’s something that connects the emotional and the cerebral.”
 
Presumably that’s what he felt when he met Deb Fiorella, the firm’s strategic director — and his spouse. Together, the two dissect every aspect of their client companies and distill the findings into logos and identity schemes that may appear on thousands of “touchpoints” from packaging to business cards to TV ads.
 
In approaching an assignment, Fiorella said, “The goal is to discover who you (the company) want to be. What’s the personality of the brand? Is it bold, sassy, quiet?

Craig Franke, left, and Deb Fiorella
Craig Franke, left, and Deb Fiorella

“Brands are relationships,” she said. “The logo triggers an emotional response about everything you know about that brand.”
 
Gap, the clothing store, discovered that recently when it adopted a new logo. After an outcry from fans on social media, the company hastily reverted back to its old logo.
 
Other aspects of logo development are more subtle. Colors may have different meanings in different parts of the world, for example — so a logo designed for worldwide use has to be configured in a way that won’t offend audiences in other cultures.
 
The Cargill logo actually came together pretty quickly, Franke said. Cargill was undergoing a strategic shift from a commodities seller to a business solutions provider. Setting the logo in italics signaled progressiveness, while the stylized leaf was a nod to the company’s old logo and its agricultural heritage.

In today’s marketing world, there’s a lot more emphasis on the visual aspects of branding. If you doubt that, consider one word: Apple.
 
“Look at the iPhone,” Franke said. “It’s beautifully designed. And look at the sales.”
 
More than 60 million since its 2007 introduction. Design does matter.

Comments (5)

  1. Submitted by Jeff Klein on 11/08/2010 - 09:25 am.

    See, not only do I prefer the retro appeal of the old logo, but I think it really conveys the sense of evilness that overcomes me when I think of Cargill.

  2. Submitted by Kevin Slator on 11/08/2010 - 06:57 pm.

    I don’t doubt that the new logo “came together pretty quickly.” It’s the company name in italics with what is presumably a leaf resting on top of it. Not hard to see how that didn’t take much time to come up with.

    This is news?

  3. Submitted by John Reinan on 11/08/2010 - 09:13 pm.

    Holy moley! You try designing a logo for a gazillion-dollar company! Let’s see what you come up with.

  4. Submitted by Bob Poorman on 11/09/2010 - 08:52 am.

    I’m fascinated with the evolution of a given company’s logo and the great amount of thought that goes into its transformation over the years. As is stated within this piece “The logo triggers an emotional response about everything you know about that brand.” Everything I “know triggers” my “response” that the world is more nutritiously fed, educated and benefits greatly through its local community contributions as a result of this organization’s business and philanthropic efforts. Great logo AND a great company. Congratulations on both.

  5. Submitted by Kevin Slator on 11/11/2010 - 05:42 pm.

    John, if Cargill will float me what Frank+Fiorella got for what they produced, I’ll take a whack at it. I guaratee I’ll come up with something more original and creative. I might get wild and underline AND italicize “Cargill”… 🙂

Leave a Reply