Poison vote looms for Tea Tarty freshmen: Raise the national debt limit?

WASHINGTON — Even though a vote to raise the national debt limit — now just under $14.3 trillion — is months away, House Republican leaders are already preparing their caucus for what could be the toughest vote for a bumper freshman class.

About half of the 85-member Republican House freshman class ran with backing from tea party groups – all of them on a platform to curb or cap government spending. Many of these candidates slammed Democrats they defeated for previous votes to increase the debt limit – votes, they said, that enabled big government spending.

Now, they face the other side of the issue: A vote against raising the debt limit means the government could run out of money. Will fiscal responsibility look so appealing if the government essentially shuts down?

GOP leaders hope to frame the debt vote in a broader context of rigorous budget cutting and enhanced oversight.

“I’ve made it pretty clear to them that as we get into next year it’s pretty clear that Congress is going to have to deal with this,” said GOP leader John Boehner at a press conference.

“We’re going to have to deal with it as adults,” he added. “Whether we like it or not, the federal government has obligations, and we have obligations on our part.”

Congressman Boehner’s pragmatic line, however, will be tough for many Republicans to swallow.

“This is going to cause considerable consternation for many Republicans who came to Washington running against Democrats for raising the debt limit, regardless of whether they fight it,” says David Wasserman, who covered 2010 House races for the Cook Political Report. “If it passes they’re going to assume some responsibility and there’s going to be some serious heat from the tea party movement and Republican voters.”

Tea party backers Rep. Ron Paul (R) of Texas and Sen.-elect Rand Paul (R) of Kentucky, his son, are leading opposition to raising the debt limit. “It would look very negative to the rest of the world to not vote to increase the debt limit,” says Congressman Paul. “We might have to be late on payments to government contractors. It would be chaotic.”

“But having such huge debts is very negative, too.”

Critics call that view irresponsible. “It does make a difference if you don’t raise the debt ceiling: the government will run out of cash,” says Stan Collender, a budget expert at Qorvis Communications in Washington. “Delaying payments to social security recipients or government contractors is a nonstarter. It’s the day we start to look like a third world country.”

Boehner, expected to be voted Speaker in the 112th Congress, says that the House Republican caucus has yet to engage the issue. “We’ll have time over the coming months to discuss that issue and how we might move such an issue, but those conversations haven’t started yet,” he said.

Comments (1)

  1. Submitted by Hénock Gugsa on 11/19/2010 - 03:57 pm.

    ” …if you don’t raise the debt ceiling: the government will run out of cash…”
    ———————————————–

    And, of-course, we are not going to raise revenue by raising taxes. We are just going to have to borrow more, and somehow future generations will pay the debt. Or another and simpler way is to just do away with government or whittle it to nothingness as Tea Partiers have been proposing. We will call it the self-amputation option.

    There is, however, another way … but we will never admit to thinking it. Next election cycle, the democrats could come back to power. And then, they will maniacally clean up our mess. We all know they can’t help their obsessive-compulsive nature!

Leave a Reply