The Boy Scouts of America is in the process of removing its national antigay policy. The Texas-based youth group announced Tuesday that it will vote next week on whether to allow decisions about gay members to be made at the local level.
But as this group that was once nearly synonymous with American youth has begun dismantling a policy that some of its chapters have dubbed “repugnant,” the question arises, can this century-old institution ever be as dominant as it once was in American family life?
Families simply have so many other choices, as well as demands on their time, that it’s unlikely a single group will ever have that central a role in the life of American youngsters again, says Susan Shapiro Barash, who teaches gender studies at Marymount Manhattan College.
“It certainly evokes a gentler time in our country’s history,” she says. “The sheer fun, the boyishness of it, now is not so much front and center in our culture,” she adds, noting that parents are more deliberate in their after-school choices. “There is so much more competition to get ahead from an earlier age that being a Boy Scout now is probably not as expedient.”
This is a parenting reality that April Masini, an online advice columnist based in Naples, Fla., says she regularly encounters in questions from parents about the right choices to make for their children’s activities.
“The generation of helicopter parents who usher their children through childhood like white on rice have found myriad options of after-school activities, many of which are considered pre-college application favorites – and yes, I’m talking about activities for kids of all ages, including pre-school,” she notes via e-mail.
Parents seek out chess and debate teams for kindergartners, as well as museum-hosted enrichment and other programs such as the Center for Talented Youth at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore that include families and elementary school kids who are gifted, she points out. “The Boy Scouts have competition, and families have options,” she adds.
This week’s announcement about its policy on gays could be critical to the Boy Scouts halting the losses to its ranks. The Boy Scouts of America did not return calls for comment, but a 2010Boston Globe article about the group’s centennial celebration noted that between 1998 and 2009, national BSA enrollment shrank from roughly 3.3 million to some 2.7 million. A 2010 Gallup pollshowed that while some 45 percent of men 50 and older had been Boy Scouts, that figure shrank to 27 percent of men aged 18 to 24.
Many observers say the group’s latest move to back away from an organization-wide ban on gays may be decisive in stopping further shrinkage. “This is huge, real progress,” says Andrew Koppelman, a law professor at Northwestern University near Chicago and co-author of “A Right to Discriminate? How the Case of Boy Scouts of America v. James Dale Warped the Law of Free Association.”
He notes that the no-gays policy had created a divisive struggle between a number of the largest urban chapters and the Plano, Texas-based organization.
“The Chicago chapter has had a very hard time raising money because so many businesses do not want to be associated with discriminatory policies,” he says. This has been particularly hurtful to the urban chapter, which relies on paid staff because of a lack of volunteers.
A coalition of BSA chapters in New Jersey tried to state a nondiscriminatory policy, posting one online, Professor Koppelman says, but the national organization threatened the state’s chapters with being cut off, “so they took it down.” The new stance on gays, he notes, “will be very welcome.”
Many parents, heterosexual and gay, have found the policy on gays a deterrent to joining the BSA, says Abbie Goldberg, associate professor of psychology at Clark University in Worcester, Mass. The author of “Lesbian and Gay Parents: Research on the family life cycle” says that in the process of interviewing both heterosexual and gay parents for her book, she found that concern about a policy that was out of step with the rest of the world was keeping parents from putting their sons in the BSA.
This is a shift from the BSA’s own history, Ms. Goldberg notes. “The group was a leader in reaching out to blacks and Jews at a time when other organizations were discriminating,” she says, adding that BSA will most likely not die out, but “it will probably narrow its appeal.”
For instance, she says, it will help families in urban areas where public programs are being cut and where they have fewer options.
But scouting families say the organization is as important as ever.
“Boy Scouts is a private organization, but it is also an American institution that develops character. Its highest level of leadership training (Wood Badge) requires involvement in bringing diversity to your scout unit,” says Michael Reinemer, who is a Scout leader in Annendale, Va., where his 10-year-old son is a Cub Scout, currently graduating into Boy Scouts.
His own father was a Boy Scout and the 59-year-old health-care worker says this new ruling will help a lot.
“The new decision is going to bring many families back to scouting,” he says, “because the old policy was just so disheartening it made many people turn away. It was so out of step with the 21st century. I am very pleased,” he says.
On the other hand, the BSA may have to do nothing short of reinventing itself as a completely coed movement to get on the schedule for the 4- and 6-year-old sons of David Cohen, a constitutional law and gender issues expert at Drexel University Law School in Philadelphia.
Sex segregation is simply not an option, he says. Children today are growing up in a world full of girls and boys, all of whom they will have to learn to interact with and understand, he notes. “These are the skills they will need for the rest of their lives, so why remove them from their formative years?” he asks.