The mystery of ‘pork chop island’

MinnPost photo by Bill Lindeke
A pork chop island at Como and Raymond in the St. Anthony Park neighborhood of St. Paul.

When you go to transportation meetings, you find yourself learning jargon. Most often, it will be an acronym like LOS (level of service), AADT (annual average daily traffic), or NACTO (National Association of City Transportation Officials). But sometimes the vocabulary can surprise, as it did the first time I heard the term “pork chop island.”

“Pork chop island?” I scribbled down in the margins of my agenda, before circling it twice and adding another question mark. 

As it turns out, this amusing term is not a new Lowertown restaurant, but denotes the triangular sliver of concrete created by free-flowing right-turn “slip lanes” at intersections. They have the transportation benefits of improving vehicular safety by reducing complexity, and increasing the turn radius of a corner in ways that allow larger vehicles to turn more easily. But depending on the situation, pork chops can be dangerous or inconvenient for pedestrians and bicyclists, and some cities are starting to think more carefully about when and where they install them.

What is a pork chop? 

When you google “pork chop island” you get a lot of advice about kitchen counters, and you have to dig a little deeper before you come to any intersection engineering schematics. The history of urban street design revolves around intersections, the key places where conflict points — every potential car, pedestrian, or bicycle — can overload drivers’ ability to perceive their environment.

Reduce complexity

The guiding principle for improving intersection safety is to reduce complexity — for example, by creating a dedicated left-turn signal phase or adding a pedestrian median. Slip lanes and pork chop islands can accomplish both goals simultaneously. But if designed incorrectly, pork chops encourage drivers to speed around corners, ignoring crosswalks altogether.

“Pork chops seem like kind of a dated concept right now,” explained Matt Steele, a Minneapolis urbanist and former City Council candidate. “With pork chops, people [drivers] are concerned about where they’re going, and not what else is happening at the spot where they are.”

According to Steele, pork chops might work for suburban areas, because they can encourage cars to speed around corners without stopping. If you’re there on foot or a bicycle, however, that behavior can be uncomfortable and dangerous.

“Ever since I was a little kid, it’s frustrated me,” Sean Hayford O’Leary told me. “I grew up in Northfield thinking it’s so unsafe. You press a button and are assured a walk signal and cars have to stop for you, but to get to that button you have to cross this free flow of traffic.”

These days, there are subtle changes to pork chop designs intended to decrease the speed at which cars turn the corner. Instead of having a constant turn radius, the pork chop is elongated to create a tighter angle that encourages drivers to turn and look for oncoming traffic.

Federal Highway Administration

“Hennepin County tries to use squared-up intersections with modal balancing,” Nick Peterson explained. “In doing this sometimes we need to include pork chops — especially at skewed intersections or major arterials. The pork chops reduce multimodal exposures, as well as clarify and influence movements of the traveling public. There is no one-size-fits-all approach to designing intersections. Pork chops are just one option that we have to consider during the balancing act that is design.” 

But in many cases, especially involving large trucks, pork chops are useful for allowing turns at wider angles.

“Pork chops are faster and smoother of a movement for cars or a large truck,” O’Leary said. “They don’t have to make the hook maneuver where the truck goes into other lane, and I have heard engineers claim that it makes it safer for pedestrians because drivers are so focused on looking.” 

The Bloomington incident

But pedestrians and pork chops can be a deadly combination. Last month, a tragedy unfolded on a pork chop island in Bloomington, at the corner of 86th and Nicollet. Crisostomo Sanchez-Sanchez was waiting for the bus at the stop on the pork chop on the southwest corner when a southbound Xcel truck swerved to avoid a turning car. He was hit, pinned under the truck, and died.

Unlike many pork chops, which often date back decades to design eras that prioritized traffic flow over pedestrian spaces, the Bloomington intersection was recently reconstructed, around five years ago. The southwest corner received a pork chop treatment.

The crash that killed Sanchez-Sanchez wasn’t directly related to a car speeding through the slip lane, normally the danger presented by the pork chop design. But if the bus stop hadn’t been placed on the pork chop in the first place, the crash might not have had tragic results. That’s something that really bothered O’Leary, who serves as a planning commissioner in neighboring Richfield.

“I object to bus stops being located on pork chops,” O’Leary told me. “The one where the crash occurred, you might potentially be waiting 20 minutes in the middle of the intersection.”

Responding to emails from Steele, the City of Bloomington referred the matter to the Police Department, stating that “while your questions relate to background on the intersection, the Police have an active investigation underway related to yesterday’s crash and are the point of contact on the issue right now.”

“Looking at what caused that crash, one of the main contributors was the pork chop that was put in there a few years ago,” Steele said. “There’s a metro transit bus stop on an island of concrete between speeding cars. It was the final design thing that went in, and doesn’t appear in any of the planning documents that I could find.”

For me, the pork chops that most grate on my daily commutes are the ones along the downtown St. Paul bridges, allowing free right turns between Kellogg Boulevard, Robert, and Wabasha. With the pork chops, crossing the street can involve dodging cars that can speed around the corner without slowing down.

MinnPost photo by Bill Lindeke
A lonely pork chop in Brooklyn Park.

Dynamic is changing

But slowly that dynamic is changing as cities and counties begin rethinking intersections.

“There has been a paradigm shift for the transportation industry where the aim is to tighten up intersections where we can,” said Nick Peterson, a design manager for Hennepin County Public Works. “It is less about ‘automobiles first,’ which means fewer free rights and large sweeping curb radii.”

New terminology allows you to get a better grasp on the world around you. By naming things, we can more easily notice and understand them, and pork chops are no exception. Once you start seeing them, it turns out that we are surrounded by pork chops. 

You can also learn about all our free newsletter options.

Comments (6)

  1. Submitted by Jim Million on 09/09/2016 - 03:53 pm.

    Love this one, Bill

    Definitely new information I shall never forget.
    Wonder if these were named before or after “Pork Chop Hill” in Korea, also named for its contour.

  2. Submitted by Monica Millsap on 09/10/2016 - 06:44 am.

    As a pedestrian, I greatly miss the pork chop that was at Snelling and University at the Spruce Tree building. With the pork chop, I never had trouble crossing the street. I was clearly visible to the right turning cars and their right turning intentions were obvious to me. Now that the pork chop is gone, crossing at that spot is really dangerous. As a pedestrian, I’ve had way too many near misses.

    On the other hand, when Snelling was redesigned for the A-Line, I was happy to see that the bus stop on the pork chop at I94 was removed. While the stop was a convenient location for some, it was also very dangerous to get to, especially if cars were backed up there. The pork chop remains, however, and I’m happy it does. Knowing how unsafe Snelling and University became without the pork chop, I strongly advocated for that one to remain. I cannot imagine trying to cross the I94 bridge right there without it, unless the intersection used a pedestrian scramble signal. BTW, a pedestrian scramble signal is what should have happened at Snelling and University when they took away that pork chop.

  3. Submitted by Richard Newmark on 09/10/2016 - 09:28 am.

    Pork Chops

    I advocate for traffic cameras to ticket cars (not the drivers) running red lights or speeding through right turns when pedestrians or bicyclists are present.

  4. Submitted by Jim Young on 09/10/2016 - 05:35 pm.

    Did anyone get a comment from the MTC

    Bill – did you call the MTC and ask them for a comment on the bus stop placement on the “pork chop?” They can and will change stop locations if there’s reasonable safety issues. I called them once about the bus stop at Como & 25th Ave. SE where a bus picking up or dropping off passengers obscured the stop sign at the intersection which is a 4-way stop. Not long after my call, they moved the stop across 25th.

  5. Submitted by Steve Elkins on 09/11/2016 - 03:31 pm.

    The new porkchop design

    Bill,

    Thanks for calling attention to the new FHWA recommendation on pork chop designs. The “new” design has been around for a while, now, but hidebound traffic engineers have been slow to embrace it. The new design requires the driver to focus on the slip lane in front of front of him (and pedestrians trying to cross it), whereas the old design encouraged drivers to prematurely look back over their shoulders towards the traffic that they would be merging into, especially if the slip lane is excessively wide.

    Steve Elkins

Leave a Reply