Shepard Road
Little-used Shepard Road sits in the valley, occupying space and providing a metaphor for the city’s economy. Credit: Photo by Zach Mensinger

Believe it or not, I had a delightful experience down by the river in downtown St. Paul the other day. I bicycled with friends along a wide stretch of road with the Mississippi on one side and the city’s white rock bluffs on the other. Surprisingly, it was quiet. You could almost hear the river flowing on the other side of the levee wall. This was noteworthy because it almost never happens in Minnesota’s capital city.

If you’ve spent any time there, you already know downtown St. Paul is not famed for its riverfront. For 70 years, the banks of the river have been dominated by railroad tracks and a wide concrete highway. The only walking path is a narrow trench that feels uncomfortably close to fast traffic, if you can even access it. There are precious few connections between downtown and the Mississippi, all of them ceded to turning trucks and cars.

Yet for three weeks this spring, there was a window of opportunity. Thanks to spring floods, St. Paul’s waterfront freeway, Shepard Road, was closed to vehicular traffic. During that time, the  river was transformed. It made an excellent case for a different future, one where the riverfront experience might be valued more than a few minutes of freeway time.

A brief history of Shepard Road

St. Paul’s Shepard Road is a four-lane divided freeway about 60 years old, originally planned to bring industrial vitality to St. Paul’s long-struggling manufacturing and warehousing sector. It was part of a midcentury economic development strategy that focused on industrial uses, for example, bulldozing the West Side’s working-class Mexican and Jewish neighborhoods along the river for an industrial park, one of the city’s great tragedies. In that same vein, planners envisioned a riverfront freeway that would bring trucking and commerce seamlessly into St. Paul’s downtown from east and west.

Since then, the road has largely underdelivered on its promise. There’s precious little industrial activity along the corridor, other than some warehousing and light manufacturing (e.g. Nut Rolls) near the airport. Since a 1990s redesign, which expanded the road at great expense, it’s been overbuilt for the amount of traffic it receives. Traffic peaked before COVID around 18,000 cars a day on the western section. But with shifts since the pandemic, vehicle counts have been cut in half, leaving a wide freeway largely empty.

Shepard Road, circa 1960s
[image_credit]Courtesy of the Minnesota Historical Society[/image_credit][image_caption]Shepard Road, circa 1960s[/image_caption]
Meanwhile, St. Paul planners have occasionally imagined ways to bring traffic to Shepard Road by re-configuring it, moving cars away from West 7th Street (State Highway 5) or connecting to Interstate 35E. But the steep topography and complex interchanges make that an expensive dream. Instead, the bluffs ensure that Shepard Road will likely remain underused and marginal.

City House as window to the future

The road is a problem because, over the last century, many downtown riverfronts have seen dramatic change. That’s certainly true in Minneapolis. There, what was once an overwhelmingly industrial scene of mills and railyards slowly transformed into its opposite over 40 years. Minneapolis’ riverfront today offers serene parkland ringed by residential revitalization so attractive it’s lured the state’s wealthiest residents, lines of tourists balanced on Segways, and every wedding photographer within a hundred miles.

American river cities fall somewhere along a spectrum between glorious renaissance and industrial purgatory. But one consistent trend is that riverfront freeways have proved the death knell for any revitalization. Notorious examples like Chicago’s Lakeshore Drive, Boston’s Storrow Drive, or Cincinnati’s various freeways have long kept their downtowns at arm’s length from positive change. On the other hand, there are plenty of terrific riverfront parks like those in Minneapolis, Pittsburgh or Detroit.

The jury remains out in St. Paul. If you want to contemplate the stakes, head to City House, city parkland just up the river from downtown offering a rare riverfront patio experience. Located in an old elevator building —  part of a century-old economic grain scheme that set up a municipal co-op to break Minneapolis’ railroad monopoly on wheat. It was once part of a large industrial complex connecting trains to a barge terminal, which gradually declined throughout the 20th century.

These days, City House provides the best place to sit and soak in the future of St. Paul riverfront. Blissfully separated from Shepard Road by 250 feet of trees and apartment buildings, it’s about the only Twin Cities spot where you get a sense of the river’s potential. You might grab a snack along a railing and sip wine while a tug from Upper River Services parks an empty barge on the piling just a few feet away. It offers a splendid vision for the future of the city, a balance between the “working river” and a vibrant urban park.

Work in progress

Most people in St. Paul already know about the riverfront problem. Planners and civic leaders have floated various schemes to connect the city to the water, many of which struggle to deal with the barriers presented by the railroad and highway.

“There are a lot of things that will bring St. Paul’s physically closer to the Mississippi,” explained Sean Kershaw, the city’s Director of Public Works.

Kershaw was quick to point out that the road is owned and controlled by the County, and Ramsey County officials will lead on future decisions. But he also pointed to projects like the city’s ambitious River Balcony project, a bricolage of architectural tactics that would bring people closer to the bluff and the river itself.

Shepard Road strategies
[image_credit]City of St.Paul[/image_credit]
Along with a park that might be part of the proposed River’s Edge development, another key suggestion from the balcony brainstorm was to enact road diets on Shepard Road. Though without specifics, the plans suggest pedestrian medians, removing a lane, or other tactics that would help the riverfront look and feel more like  Minneapolis’ river parkway.

“We’re thinking there’ll be new opportunities for change, but absolutely no new decision has been made,” said Sean Kershaw, after pointing out that the road has decades to go before it requires reconstruction.

Today, St. Paul’s waterfront’s potential is eviscerated by the constant din of traffic and enough speeding cars to make anyone feel uneasy. But just under that unpleasantness lays what amounts to a beach, a lovely place for strolling, gazing at driftwood, or pondering this amazing place, home to Dakota people who for thousands of years before Pig’s Eye ever showed up.

At the very least, the city and county should figure out a way to close Shepard Road on summer weekends. Park some food trucks down on the concrete. Install a pop up playground. Give people skateboards, whatever it takes to offer St. Paulites a chance to experience St. Paul’s missing riverfront bliss. Once you hear the sound of the cottonwoods in the breeze or gaze up at the white stone bluffs, you’ll never see the city the same way again.

Join the Conversation

6 Comments

  1. You hit the nail on the head! St Paul river area has a lot of potential. I prefer city redo this area over Summit Bike trail any day. The City House is a nugget or jewel, but probably not well known. Great spot! I have biked along the river for St Paul Classic- nice connections and think this should be a priority for bikers, etc… and simply pave/re-stripe Summit Ave. Railroad would be almost impossible to move, but fences or bushes as fences work. Shephard Road could be 3 lanes with middle being a suicide lane. You could use a nice sidewalk like the one by Science Museum in few areas. Have cut outs for food trucks….Could improve the Paddleboat docking area as well….connect it to Harriet Island with a foot bridge…. etc…The area near Hwy 52 could be upgraded as there is a lot of flat space there…..Look at Tucson’s bike lanes.

    It can be done with cars as in Lake City, but space makes planning more challenging. Can you run for St Paul mayor and lead this idea? 🙂

  2. I use Shepard Road every time I need to get to downtown St Paul. It’s a much better, more mellow alternative to W 7th. Although it is 4 lanes divided, I would hesitate to call it a “freeway” as there are points to turn onto it directly from local neighborhood streets.

    1. “4 lanes divided” is second only to “4 lanes” as a pedestrian death trap, especially if the divider is narrow.
      It is extremely difficult to cross four lanes safely without a stoplight. If a car stops for you to cross, this is actually bad because the car in the next lane may not see you and may not stop, thereby running you over. It can be impossible to have all four lanes clear at the same time to run across.

  3. Maybe I’m grossly misreading the article, but it doesn’t seem to me, at all, that underutilization of the St Paul riverfront is due to Warner Road or its degradation of adjacent public spaces. I’ve biked the riverfront scores of times over the years, Warner Road between Mpls and Hwy 10, and more recently the lovely newer trails on the other side of the river (Lilydale Rd etc). Almost the entirety of both sides of the river is parkland/public land, and the trail is generous and separated from the road, often by a distance. There are terrific vistas and microenvironments, and even when the trail is right adjacent to Warner Rd, the limited traffic casts the road more as vaguely melancholic Americana than as a sensory intrusion.

    It seems the inherent issue is the bluff – both the grade and the distance it creates to move between the riverfront and the settled land above. And the grade between above and below tends to be populated by large institutional uses that make the transition unshaded, and not particularly interesting or pleasant, on foot. And, though I’m all for public space and social capital, I think advocates for public space tend to have an implicit “build it, and they will come” attitude. But it may be the case, due to our cultural ways etc, that there just isn’t a huge demand for public spaces in which folks just want to spend hours strolling around. Generally speaking, underutilized public spaces tends to be more the rule than the exception.

Leave a comment