Nonprofit, nonpartisan journalism. Supported by readers.

Donate

The Minneapolis Foundation generously supports MinnPost's Community Sketchbook coverage. Learn why.

Artists ask: When it comes to wealth, what’s ‘enough’?

Nancy Maeker
Rod Maeker
Nancy Maeker, left, director of A Minnesota Without Poverty, checks out Shauna Pineiro’s symbol of “enough,” an African Baobab tree, which stores food and water.

Speaking in the economic sense, we all pretty much know what’s NOT enough to make life comfortable, including the $22,000 for a family of four that the federal government has established as a national poverty threshold.

But Tuesday’s U.S. Census report  demonstrating that the top-earning 20 percent of Americans received 49.4 percent of all income generated in the country might have more of us pondering a question Nancy Maeker and others have been asking for a very long time:

What, exactly, is “enough”? 

Now, provocatively, the group is calling on artists to use their talent to depict: “What is enough? Who has enough? Access to Enough for all.”  All media are welcome, from dance to drama, song to sculpture, video to fiber art, poetry to paint to photography. Already 20 artists have signed on for the show called “In Search of Enough” to be displayed around the state. More details here.

Yet even before these most recent U.S. Census numbers were released, Maeker, director of the statewide A Minnesota Without Poverty, folks at Bethlehem Lutheran Church in Minneapolis and other partners started brainstorming ways to get people not only asking but answering that question.

The goal is to initiate a conversation among people of all economic classes, says Maeker, a pastor with the Evangelical Lutheran Church. The discussion starts at 7 p.m. Thursday, Sept. 30, at Bethlehem Lutheran Church, 4100 Lyndale Ave. S., Minneapolis, when folks get together to hear author Lynne Twist speak about her book, “The Soul of Money.”

The book,  Maeker says, debunks the “myths of scarcity,” the belief that there’s not enough to go around, that more is better, that there are always going to be the very rich and the very poor.

Maeker argues this: “If we end poverty in Minnesota, that’s not just good for the people in poverty, that’s good for everyone.” Yet straight talk about the inequality in American society tends to bring some tempers to the boiling point, she acknowledges.

Thus, the art show. “It’s non-threatening,” she said, and it will get people talking, just as art did Monday at Central Lutheran Church in Minneapolis.

‘A good job. A nice house.’
Maeker preached to a racially diverse crowd of about 50 adults in the church’s Fellowship Hall – many of them drawn to the downtown church and its religious and social-service programs because the emergency shelters where they stay nights are closed during daylight hours. In shopping totes or knapsacks, these guests carried their belongings.

Later, they’d lunch on sloppy joes, potato salad and fresh strawberries or head downstairs to the free store for clothes or household items, for medical help, spiritual direction or referrals. 

Maeker told a Bible story from the book of Luke about a rich man and a beggar, with the poor man finding his reward in heaven. Then she asked her listeners: “How would you picture enough? What would it look like, in pictures or words?” and passed out large sheets of white paper and colored markers.

Words were plentiful, such as these from Larry B.: “Enough in my life is: A good job. A nice house.  Happiness. Jesus. Family. God. Enough money to balance with work.”

But at least two people drew detailed pictures. In greens and browns, Harry Werner, from northeast Minneapolis, created a tidy little log cabin at lakeside, evergreens behind it, a man in a simple row boat fishing in front of it.

Jewelry artist Shauna Pineiro, who wore a wide-brimmed black hat and a lovely smile, fashioned a gigantic, fat-trunked, African Baobab tree. The tree, she said, is a symbol of enough, as it stores up water after rain, provides food for animals and lives for 1,000 years.  “It’s like the tree of life,” she said.

Comments (6)

  1. Submitted by Dennis Tester on 09/29/2010 - 04:03 pm.

    The benefits of living in a free society is that you can apply yourself in such a way that will enable you to earn as little or as much as you want. And what you do with your earnings, whether it’s to spend it, give it away, or save it for a rainy day is your business.

  2. Submitted by Melodie Morstad on 09/29/2010 - 09:06 pm.

    Give me break, Dennis. So you’re telling me that CEOs work 400+ times harder than their lowest employees? That’s ridiculous. The roots of poverty are more complex than “poor people are lazy and/or waste their money.”

    In respose to the article, I think this is a great idea. Commercial culture and marketing give us the impression that there is no enough, always just a little more (or a lot) than what we have now. I think the key to surviving this economy will discarding dreams of the (fake) lives we see on tv and movies and replacing them with a framework of an enough that is truly fulfilling. All this while still striving for economic justice for everyone in our communities.

    I’m no artist, but I think I’ll try this project for my own personal exercise.

  3. Submitted by Michele Olson on 09/30/2010 - 09:01 am.

    Actually, Dennis, the benefit of living in a free society is being able to say what you want without fear of government reprisal. I refuse to believe that the hundreds of thousands of Americans who have died for this country, lost their lives so that you can get stuff.

    Scandinavian countries have already embraced this philosophy, and are the better for it.

    My question to Cynthia Boyd, though, is where she found the exact numbers from the Census? I’m not questioning the numbers, Ms. Boyd, but they concern me. These kinds of disparities cause revolutions. Just because we live in the United States does not make us immune.

  4. Submitted by Nancy Maeker on 09/30/2010 - 04:20 pm.

    To answer the question of where the census numbers come from that Cynthia used, check this website: http://www.chn.org/issues/statistics/povertyday2010.html

    And to Melodie: you do not need to be a professional artist to participate in depicting “enough” because the reflection involved is the point! And then the conversation!

  5. Submitted by Mohammed Ali Bin Shah on 02/06/2011 - 07:48 am.

    “top-earning 20 percent of Americans received 49.4 percent of all income generated in the country ”

    First, income is earned by a person, not generated “in the country”.

    Second, people don’t receive their income, they earn it.

    If income is somehow magically “generated” and is “received” by people, than it must belong to all, right? The language from the beginning of this article indicates a contempt for hard work and achievement and a love of a socialist redistrubitve society.

  6. Submitted by Margaret Chayka on 04/17/2011 - 09:10 am.

    Liberals’ obsession with “the rich” and their salaries is truly astounding. Just you try being a CEO for a day and see how it goes. You have to have an iron stomach for it and work well under extreme pressure, not to mention have a ton of business, people, and communications skills – and instead of watching the clock so they can go out drinking with the guys or catching the latest uptown production, they’re staying late and taking work home with them. Do they work 400% harder than you – well, some do just that. But never mind that for a moment; let’s just pretend that these evil rich people all of a sudden now make about $60K. Problem solved! Now what are you going to do? What is your strategy now?

Leave a Reply