The following is a slightly condensed text of Sen. Al Franken’s remarks at the Mental Health Education Project’s 10th anniversary dinner, held Saturday in Bloomington. The project is a collaboration of Jewish Family and Children’s Service of Minneapolis and Jewish Family Service of St. Paul.

Franni and I want to thank all of you for all you do to improve the lives of Minnesotans with substance abuse and mental health issues and the lives of their families.

The Mental Health Education Project has been building bridges in our communities for ten years, strengthening mental health and substance abuse services in our state. And the Barbara Schneider Foundation, under Mark [Anderson]’s leadership, has been a pioneer in educating law enforcement about mental health so they can respond appropriately and avoid tragedies like Barbara’s death. The work you do saves lives. You are the real champions here, and I’m proud to be a strong voice for you in Washington.

So, I cannot tell you how much this honor means to me and Franni. I’m not sure I deserve it. I know Franni does.

There’s a story I’ve told before about the last time I saw Paul [Wellstone]. It was October of 2002 in St. Paul.

Franni and I were living in New York at the time. I had come to town as I often did to visit my mom, who was in a nursing home in St. Louis Park — and to campaign for Paul.

My mom had dementia. And some days were worse than others. And that day had been a particularly bad day.

Now in the evening, I drove to St. Paul to do an event with Paul and Sheila at the University Club. And when I got to there, the first thing Paul said to me was, “How’s your mom?”  Now, he was in the fight of his political life. Paul had just voted against going to war in Iraq and the entire campaign had been pretty nasty and was getting nastier. But the first thing Paul said to me is “How’s your mom?”

Sen. Al Franken
Sen. Al Franken

And I told him, “Well, not so good today. In fact, I couldn’t even have a conversation with her.”

And Paul said to me, “Well, you know touch means so much.”

And the next day when I went back to the nursing home, it was a beautiful fall day, not unlike so many of the beautiful days we’ve had this fall, and I took my mom in her wheelchair out to the garden. And she was having another bad day. So, I just sat next to her in the garden and put my arm around her and hugged her in the sunlight. And I really don’t know if it meant much to her. But it meant a whole lot to me.

And that was Paul. “Touch means so much.” 

Paul had in spades what we Jews call Rachmones. It means compassion, empathy. It’s a concept central to Judaism. Not every Jew has it. Plenty of gentiles do. But it is central to our faith in no small part because of our history as a people.

Paul cared about immigrants. He cared about the homeless. He cared about veterans. And he cared about mental illness. Paul came to that in large part because a member of his family had a mental illness. His brother was schizophrenic. And Paul saw very firsthand his brother’s suffering and the effect on his family.

Pete Domenici came to the issue because his daughter has mental illness. He, too, knows the suffering it can cause.

So Paul and Senator Domenici teamed up and tackled inequities in the way mental health is treated in the health insurance business. In 1992, Paul and Senator Domenici introduced the Mental Health Parity Act, which became law in 1996. But it wasn’t the real victory they wanted because the final version of the bill allowed employers to shift the cost to employees by raising copayments and deductible in insurance policies.

So, they kept at it and teamed together again to broaden the scope of the bill. And as you know, the broader legislation was passed in 2008 in Paul’s honor and renamed the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008.

While the Wellstone-Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Act requires equal coverage of mental health and substance abuse benefits if your insurance includes these services, the health-care reform law provides full parity by requiring that all health plans include these services.

Now, this past year and a half as we were writing and eventually passing the health-care reform bill, I felt that part of my job as a member of the Health, Education, Labor and Pension Committee was to make sure that the HHS Secretary was paying proper attention in the crafting of the rules and regulation in regard to mental health and addiction.

And in the coming years, I look forward to working with you in making sure that the implementation of these provisions and rules continues on the right path.
 
Also, on the HELP committee I’m preparing for the reauthorization of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, also known as SAMHSA. That reauthorization will go through our committee next year.

SAMHSA programs demonstrate that behavioral health services improve health status and reduce health care and other costs to our society. If my new colleagues in Congress want to look at bringing down long-term deficits, I suggest they look at mental health and addiction treatment.

I also sit on the Judiciary Committee, and we held an important hearing on the high percentage of prisoners who are incarcerated in our society who have mental-health issues.

And, of course, we imprison millions of people essentially for being addicted to drugs. We have more people in our prisons than any other country in the world. And I believe that it is not only the right thing to do morally to substitute treatment for prison in so many cases, it’s the right thing fiscally for society. If my new colleagues want to bring down our long term deficits, I suggest they look at mental health and addiction treatment.

In many ways, I am a fiscal conservative. But to me that doesn’t mean taking a meat axe to the budget. It means investing in those things that will increase prosperity and bring down costs to our society. That’s why I’m a big believer in early childhood education. Because it has a great return on investment.

So too does mental health and addiction treatment. My first bill, passed just two weeks after I entered the Senate, was about the return on investment of mental health. It’s actually a study to measure the return on investment of providing service dogs to veterans with PTSD and other mental wounds returning from Iraq on Afghanistan.

I’m proud of that bill. And it is my belief that the results of that study will show that service dogs will improve a lot of lives and save our society a lot of money.

I am working on a number of other things as well. The issue of preventing bullying in our schools. As we have seen in the recent tragic suicides, bullying is directly linked to mental health, and research shows that LGBT students are three times as likely as non-LGBT students to feel unsafe at school. The bullying and harassment they face contribute to their high rates of absenteeism and academic underachievement and even higher rates of suicide, as we’ve seen recently in Anoka.

To help address this problem, I introduced the Student Non-Discrimination Act, which would provide LGBT youth with the same rights that are extended to students based on race, religion, country of national origin, and language.

And finally, let me say something about Franni. Franni has picked up in many ways on the work of Sheila Wellstone. She has become very involved in domestic violence, an issue on which Sheila was a pioneer and a champion.

Many of you know, too, that Franni is a recovering alcoholic. I think if you asked Franni a few years ago if she would want pretty much everyone in Minnesota to know that she was in recovery, she would have said no. But during the campaign things got a little vicious and Franni felt that Minnesotans weren’t getting an accurate picture of who her husband was.

So, she insisted on telling her story in an ad. And it was a beautiful ad. I cried when I saw it. She taped the ad just talking to the producer off camera. And at one point, in talking about her alcoholism, Franni said something that I think spoke volumes and really hit home. She asked, “How can a mother of two beautiful, healthy children be an alcoholic?”

Esme Murphy the WCCO reporter, wrote on her blog that that line was so honest, so spoke to the shame that alcoholics feel, that it could very well reach people who were in that situation. Esme wrote that this was probably the first political ad that would actually help people. And it did. Franni tells me all the time that women come up and thank her for that.

What Franni did for me was an act of love. It was an act of courage. She never wanted people to know about this. And now there’s a new book out about the 2008 recount, written by Jay Weiner of MinnPost, called “This Is Not Florida.” In the index under Franken, Franni, the first entry is “alcoholic.”  We laughed when we saw it. Or at least I did. Did you laugh, honey?  Sort of?

So, thanks. Thanks most to Franni. But to all of you. Keep doing what you do.

Al Franken represents Minnesota in the U.S. Senate.

Join the Conversation

3 Comments

  1. Franken’s comments about Paul Wellstone are much appreciated. There are some passings which have a profound effect on events which often are underestimated or not fully understood, except historically. To me, the loss of Wellstone was one of them.

    He was a straight-up liberal. You always knew exactly where he stood on issues. He was fearless in his advocacy. And at the end, was THE giant among the liberal constituency. His passing changed many things, and I am not sure he was every fully replaced.

    Thanks Sen. Franken.

  2. What a wonderful history of things already done by Senator Franken on behalf of those in need!

    Of course our most dysfunctional conservative friends (and there are a LOT of them) will feel the compassionate, empathetic aspects of their God-given personalities, those pieces beaten (literally or figuratively) out of them by ideologically rigid parents, families, communities and churches, rattling the bars of the cages in which they are (unconsciously) kept locked away, and will respond with anger and even rage that ANYONE should have the gall and audacity to demonstrate such empathy and compassion for those in need, let alone act on it and celebrate having done so.

    Meanwhile, our conservative friends will continue in vain to seek their own happiness in the only way left to them (since without compassion and empathy they are incapable of loving human relationships, nor of any variety of deep, interpersonal, faithful relationship with God).

    As a desperate-but-useless substitute, they will continue extracting and accumulating as much money as possible from the rest of us and society in general, while offering each other and their own children money and the things it can buy as a substitute for the love they are unable to give, all-the-while, blaming the fact that their money can’t, and never will make them (or their children) happy on how much they, themselves, are the victims of ______________ (they find all sorts of creative ways to fill in this blank).

    But because they also tend to have the aspect of their personality that would have allowed them to feel responsible and take responsibility for their own lives missing and locked away, they find comfort in attaching themselves to strong, noisy leaders, but as far as leaders go, they can only trust those leaders who have the same pieces missing that they, themselves, do (this has been dubbed the “authoritarian” personality, but it might more accurately be called the “dependent” personality).

    In no case would they be willing to seek healing and the restoration of their missing pieces because to do so would be to admit that they might have been wrong and to dishonor all those people (mummy and daddy, grandma and grandpa, siblings, friends, teachers, the pastor they grew up with, etc.) who emotionally, physically, or psychologically abused them into their current sorry state.

    Because their money can never offer them the fulfillment and joy offered by the kinds of compassionate, faithful actions already demonstrated by Senator Franken, I would find them pitiable, except that the useless ways they continuously seek to substitute the accumulation of wealth for the love, self worth, and salvation they are unable to experience and their tendency to allow themselves to be manipulated by strong and strongly dysfunctional leaders is destroying our nation, even as they seek to destroy all the people who are healthier than they, themselves, are; people who make them uncomfortable by doing and acting in the healthy, faithful and fulfilling ways that they themselves are completely unable to do.

    But even if they do manage to crash the American economy and reduce our nation to extreme poverty, there will still be people finding fulfillment in faithfully helping others, no matter what their economic status, long after our “conservative” friends have destroyed the systems that would have allowed them to continue to accumulate wealth.

Leave a comment