Nonprofit, nonpartisan journalism. Supported by readers.

Donate

Community Voices features opinion pieces from a wide variety of authors and perspectives. (Submission Guidelines)

The Tuttle Strategy: The need for proxy plumbers (and other service providers), courtesy of the U.S.

In Terry Gilliam’s classic 1985 science-fiction film “Brazil,” Robert De Niro plays “Archibald Harry Tuttle,” a renegade heating engineer who clandestinely repairs the heating and cooling systems of a broken-down repressive regime. Instead of trying to destroy or overthrow the systems of the dystopian government, Tuttle fixes them to work for the everyday citizen. The United States needs a Tuttle strategy, covertly fixing systemic problems at the local level within fragile and failing states, tailoring each operation to the specific needs of the region, and positively affecting the lives of millions of people living under these fragile, repressive, or ineffectual regimes.

In July of 1969, President Richard Nixon announced a new approach to the United States’ national security objectives. His vision was to pursue American national security goals through partnerships with allies throughout the world. The Nixon Doctrine, as it would be known, would give military and economic assistance to allies resisting the Soviet Union and their proxies.

Currently the United States is providing assistance to fragile governments to resist al-Qaida and its’ affiliates influence, performing security capacity building, intelligence training, and counter-terrorism operations. The tactics currently employed by the United States to confront its largest national security threat are mostly top-down approaches. These government-level tactics can cause unintended blowback in the population’s attitude toward the United States, fostering anti-Americanism, and creating an environment for radical al-Qaida style ideology to flourish.

I am proposing that alongside the top-down tactics, a bottom-up strategy of direct action through non-state actor proxies could be adopted to further U.S. national security objectives.

Alternative infrastructures
Today, in countries that the local populations view the government as ineffectual and/or corrupt, terrorist organizations like Hezbollah and Hamas have been able to sustain legitimacy by providing basic services to residents that the government is unable to provide. These organizations are building schools and hospitals, providing jobs, giving food to the poor, and even fixing household plumbing. This strategy of creating an alternative infrastructure and a network of services is key to any insurgent movement try to supplant a government’s authority.

This strategy does work. The United States can mirror this strategy by creating its own network of service providers that can compete at the local level. Along the same lines of building an intelligence network in dangerous regions of the world, the U.S. could build a network of local teachers, doctors, bankers and plumbers. By using this network as a proxy basic services provider, the U.S. can rival and disrupt terrorist organizations that are competing for the “hearts and minds” of the local population.

For instance, terrorist organizations such as al-Qaida have been using Islamic charities as front organizations for financing terrorist operations, supplying logistical support, and funneling recruits to the group. The United States could develop its own moderate Islamic organizations, using local citizens, to provide services such as micro-loan financing for businesses, health programs for children, and jobs for idle youth.

Multiple benefits
Using these organizations, the U.S. can gain a better understanding of local conditions and culture, recruit individuals for the betterment of their society, and supply aid directly. By hiding the United States’ helping hand, the U.S. can help stabilize fractured societies within fragile states, support social cohesion, and disrupt terrorist networks’ base support structures.

This strategy would be a thankless job for the United States. The local populations would not know of the U.S. government’s direct involvement. Everything should be done covertly to avoid misrepresentation of the U.S. goals and unintended anti-American blowback. If groups like Hamas, Hezbollah, and al-Qaida can do good for their society while planning attacks against the United States and its allies, then the United States should be able to help locals citizens while hunting down and disrupting terrorist organizations.

As Archibald Harry Tuttle said “Listen, kid, we’re all in it together.”

Christopher Barich is a graduate student at the University of Minnesota, Hubert H. Humphrey Institute for Public Policy.

You can also learn about all our free newsletter options.

Comments (2)

  1. Submitted by dan buechler on 12/17/2010 - 02:47 pm.

    Interesting you should reference plumbers. Wasn’t that also part of Watergate?

  2. Submitted by Greg Kapphahn on 12/18/2010 - 10:00 am.

    I’ve heard it said that the highest (i.e. most selfless) form of giving, involves doing so in ways that prevent you from knowing who the ultimate recipient of the gift is and prevents them from knowing who it was that gave the gift.

    But I’m not too hopeful that we will carry out Mr. Barich’s ideas.

    The US doesn’t do that kind of gift giving. As a nation, we are like the distant relative who feels as if they should be thanked profusely and repeatedly for the next several months if not years for even the smallest gift, no matter how inappropriate, unneeded, or useless that gift might have been, because we give, not out of concern for those to whom we are giving, but to assuage our own insecurities brought on, as they are, by our (largely surpressed and unacknowledged) sense of guilt over our personal, national, and international misdeeds.

    As long as we, like Ebenezer Scrooge continue to seek to extract as much as possible from the rest of the world, while giving as little as possible in return, while using the false facades of “American Exceptionalism” or “personal exceptionalism” (i.e. the self-made man delusion) to lie to ourselves that we deserve to be able to do so, rather than seeking to use what we have and what we know to enhance the lives of the rest of the citizens of the globe, we will be widely reviled, even long after we have been visited by the economic and personal ghosts of our past misdeeds which will bring us to the point where we lack the means to extract anything from anyone.

Leave a Reply