Nonprofit, nonpartisan journalism. Supported by readers.


Community Voices features opinion pieces from a wide variety of authors and perspectives. (Submission Guidelines)

From Kick-the-Can to Red Rover: Honest tax reform must begin with tax expenditures

One of the best things you can say about Gov. Mark Dayton's recent budget proposal is that it is free of "kick-the-can" tricks and gimmicks.

As we’ve talked with thousands of Minnesotans about the state’s budget realities and trends, they’ve literally gasped with disbelief when they’ve seen the “kick-the-can” tricks and gimmicks used to push the burden of hard choices off onto future generations. One of the best things you can say about Gov. Mark Dayton’s recent budget proposal is that it attempts to break that cycle and begins to deal with some of those hard choices today.

Shawn Kershaw
Sean Kershaw

I hope we can now begin a more fruitful game, in which one side sends over its best ideas and the other side responds in kind. Good ideas on both sides may break through the clutter. Even among opponents, the quality of the conversation is already better than it’s been in years.

From the Citizens League’s perspective, we’re encouraged by Dayton’s proposal to broaden, and lower, the state’s sales tax. It currently covers too few things, meaning it has to be too high, and too unstable. This is a very important reform, but it’s only a piece of the puzzle and not an end, in and of itself.

Exempting certain items and actions from the state’s sales tax is one example of a tax expenditure [PDF] — an exemption for a particular activity done by a particular group, that someone once decided should be subsidized by the rest of Minnesota. Roughly 40 percent of our state’s budget is kept off the books and running on autopilot through various tax expenditures. Adding them back into the budget picture — not just as a source for more money — is a top legislative priority for the Citizens League. It’s important to evaluate them on an ongoing basis as a way to make state finances more stable and aligned with economic realities.

What we haven’t yet had, and what this budget proposal doesn’t provide, is a much-needed discussion about the value of what Minnesota is getting for those tax expenditures.

Similarly, the critical response to Dayton’s budget proposal has focused on the amount of new revenue it would generate, missing the point that it doesn’t address the value of the services we’re receiving in health care, education, transportation and elsewhere before considering additional tax dollars. Any increased spending should be tied to reforms, not just restoring previous funding cuts.

We know from our Common Cents budget and tax reform workshops that Minnesotans care more about the value of public services than how much is spent, and tie tax fairness to the quality of these services. The discussion should be about value and policy reform, not just spending more or less.

The people we talk with also care about the sustainability of our spending, and how it affects our future growth and economic productivity. Health-care costs are increasing out of control, with Medicaid at the leading edge. Medicaid was designed as a safety net program, yet today it pays 40 percent of our long-term care costs — $1 billion annually. If current trends hold, it will be up to $5 billion by 2035 and it will ruin our fiscal and economic future. Reforming Medicaid to reward savings is one example of the changes we need to be considering now for Minnesota to end up where it needs to be.

Revenue Commissioner Myron Frans was right to have dozens of conversations with Minnesotans about the need for tax reform prior to crafting this proposal. We need to continue that conversation, broadening it to include the value of services, tax expenditures and other items on the spending side of the equation. We hope this is just the beginning of such a discussion. We’re inviting all Minnesota’s citizens — not just interest groups, formal policy-makers and elected officials — to “come over” to a better discussion about where we must go as a state. Policy reform depends on it.

I encourage you to join us at our Capitol Solutions legislative event on Feb. 13 at the Minnesota History Center to learn more about tax expenditures and our priorities for tax and budget reform.

Sean Kershaw is the executive director of the Citizens League and a member. He can be reached at, 651-289-1070, @seankershaw (Twitter), or Facebook.


Write your reaction to this piece in Comments below. Or consider submitting your own Community Voices commentary; for information, email Susan Albright.

Comments (3)

  1. Submitted by Tim Gieseke on 02/07/2013 - 07:53 am.

    Value of Government and Price

    I appreciate that the Citizens League is providing depth to the budget discussion by talking about the quality of service, not just the price of government. And how those services are delivered is directly related to the business model of the government. In the last decade there is hardly an individual or business that have not transformed how they interact due to the smart technology, data and communication networks we know have at our fingertips.
    It is time we look at a “shared governance” business model that has the ability to increase the quality of services – health, education, environment – and lower transaction costs –

  2. Submitted by Virginia Martin on 02/07/2013 - 01:16 pm.


    What is a “shared governance” business model and what would it look like?
    I think it’s important to begin explaining, repeatedly, what we get for our tax dollars and how it affects our prosperity. All we hear from conservatives is that we are spending too much. We need to explain what new tax dollars do and how they affect our prosperity. For example, education. Nothing more important, yet some think we can make do with a lowered education budget from early childhood (which has huge payoffs) to university and college and advanced degrees and research. The fact is: WE KNOW THIS.
    We need more money for our infrastructure, much of which is not old, in need of repair and replacement–some dangerously so (think I-35 Bridge). And spending money on new innovative advances in technology and things that will benefit everyone. The Central Corridor is one of them (even if you don’t personally use it). Environmental advancements is another (unless we want to look like the photos of Chinese people in heavy smog and wearing masks), that affects many parts of our economy–we need clean water, clean air, soil that is free of toxins. Why would anyone come here to set up new companies if our environment is so polluted?

  3. Submitted by jody rooney on 02/07/2013 - 04:10 pm.

    I am sorry I can’t make the meeting on the 13th

    I would urge others to attend. The Citizen’s League does high quality work and is generous with their research.

    Looking at tax expenditures is as legitimate as looking at budget expenditures and should be given some priority. It would also be useful to include Legacy Amendment funds and Lottery funds to see how those have actually impacted the state.

Leave a Reply