All over the country, cash-strapped state and local governments have handed over control of critical public services and assets to corporations backed by Wall Street banks that promise to handle them better, faster and cheaper. Unfortunately for taxpayers, not only has outsourcing these services failed to keep this promise, but too often it undermines transparency, accountability, shared prosperity and competition.
Minneapolis taxpayers have seen this firsthand. In 2012, Minneapolis learned that Unisys, its information technology contractor, did not provide the city with favorable pricing on technology-related equipment and services, as required by the contract. The contract cost taxpayers $143 million over nearly a decade and was extended twice without seeking competitive bids. Upon discovery of the pricing problems, a member of the city’s audit committee expressed her surprise at the automatic contract renewals, stating that competitive bidding is just a “basic control” for ensuring that the city gets the best deal.
Outsourcing means taxpayers have very little say over how tax dollars are spent and no say on actions taken by private companies that control our public services. Outsourcing means taxpayers cannot vote out executives who make decisions that hurt public health and safety. Outsourcing means taxpayers are contractually stuck with a monopoly run by a single corporation — and those contracts often last decades. And outsourcing too often means a race to the bottom for the local economy, as wages and benefits fall while corporate profits rise.
That’s why In The Public Interest is supporting H.F. 2459, a new proposal from state Rep. Frank Hornstein, DFL-Minneapolis, that would give Minnesota taxpayers some of the strongest outsourcing protections in the nation. The measure will rein in predatory contracting of government services in Minnesota.
This legislation helps taxpayers reclaim control of their communities, and ensures that tax dollars are invested at home, not sent away to pad some giant corporation’s profits or to Wall Street bank accounts. It is a common-sense agenda that, left or right, we can all agree on.
Specifically, H.F. 2459 would:
- Limit the length of outsourcing contracts to two years.
- Require outsourcing contracts to demonstrate at least 15 percent cost savings for the service being outsourced.
- Require companies to disclose if and when they broke the law or failed to pay taxes.
- Require outsources to pay employees a similar wage to public service employees, so that savings aren’t achieved by shortchanging local workers.
Fortunately, Minnesota taxpayers are not the only ones fighting to remain in control of their vital public services. Similar measures have been introduced in states as diverse as Vermont, Tennessee, Oklahoma and California.
Public beats private
But Minnesota should be a leader on this issue, as it has been for years. Each year, the state Department of Transportation’s (MnDOT) eight districts solicit bids from private contractors as well as MnDOT’s own striping division to paint lane stripes on every highway in Minnesota. Without fail, MnDOT’s public striping crew beats the private competitors by a large margin. The public striping division is able to quote a flat price statewide of 15 cents per foot to paint an epoxy stripe. Private contractors charge 32 cents – more than double – per foot.
All too often we are told that the private sector can do things better, faster and cheaper than public service workers. Just as often, that claim turns out to be flat out wrong.
In an era of outsourcing, it is essential that lawmakers remain watchdogs for the public interest. Elected leaders should support H.F. 2459. Lawmakers championing these proposals, inluding Hornstein, stand on the side of taxpayers, and plain common sense.
WANT TO ADD YOUR VOICE?
If you’re interested in joining the discussion, add your voice to the Comment section below — or consider writing a letter or a longer-form Community Voices commentary. (For more information about Community Voices, email Susan Albright at email@example.com.)