Community Voices features opinion pieces from a wide variety of authors and perspectives. (Submission Guidelines)

Minnesota must raise Q Comp cap to support teachers

REUTERS/Dan Koeck
Good teachers deserve to be supported in and rewarded for their efforts in the classroom and beyond.

As a kid, I had strong teachers who helped me to move beyond the limitations of what I had been told was possible. They taught me that I wasn’t just a “math person” or “verbal person,” but a student who could grow and learn through the support of my teachers and my own hard work. I became a teacher to try to share those positive experiences – to teach the next generation of kids that they can succeed no matter their life circumstances.

Good teachers — like the ones I had and like the teacher I’ve tried to be — deserve to be supported in and rewarded for their efforts in the classroom and beyond. Teaching should be viewed as a career with professional autonomy, coupled with meaningful supports and measurable steps toward growth.

For the last decade, some Minnesota teachers have had just such an opportunity. Quality Compensation, or Q Comp, is a program that creates meaningful paths to career advancement, job-embedded professional development, a valuable system of evaluation, and greater flexibility in salary schedule. It helps provide pay incentives for teachers based not just on their years of experience, but on the effect they have on their students. This comprehensive framework supports and validates good teachers and keeps them in the classroom instead of burning out and leaving the profession. Q Comp ensures that we properly value the critical work my colleagues perform.

Unfortunately, despite Q Comp’s promising results (a recent study from the University of Minnesota revealed that Q Comp is raising student performance in schools where it has been implemented), it is hindered by a state-enforced funding cap. We must raise this cap in order to give more schools around our state the chance to benefit from this holistic program. If a majority of teachers in a school want to design and implement a system of supports and incentives for performance through Q Comp, an arbitrary limit on district participation should not stand in their way.

Worth celebrating and replicating

As a teacher leader with Educators 4 Excellence — Minnesota, I’ve spoken to dozens of teachers about their experiences with Q Comp. I hear the same things over and over – Q Comp provides teachers with much-needed support, ownership of student achievement, and the incentive to raise their voices on critical policy issues. It lets administrators see the great work teachers are doing, and fosters greater collaboration at all levels. These things are worth celebrating and replicating in schools throughout our state. Q Comp provides our schools with an opportunity to do that.

Given how stretched our budgets can get in education, it makes sense to invest in programs that are proving to be cost-effective. Q Comp is one research-backed, teacher-supported program that deserves the opportunity to grow to prove its potential. I urge our legislators to raise the funding cap on Q Comp so that more students benefit from an elevated, high-quality teaching profession statewide. This is an investment Minnesota cannot afford to miss.

Luke Winspur teaches math at Shakopee High School in Shakopee.

WANT TO ADD YOUR VOICE?

If you’re interested in joining the discussion, add your voice to the Comment section below — or consider writing a letter or a longer-form Community Voices commentary. (For more information about Community Voices, email Susan Albright at salbright@minnpost.com.)

You can also learn about all our free newsletter options.

Comments (1)

  1. Submitted by Greg Kapphahn on 09/08/2014 - 09:06 am.

    The Entire “Q-comp” Idea

    presumes that the average teacher isn’t bothering to do a decent job, day-by-day,…

    but will be “incentivized”, to get off their lazy backsides and do a far better job if we just offer them a financial reward for doing so.

    Of course we can all see clearly how such an approach has led to truly excellent work on the part of our nation’s outrageously highly compensated corporate executives, none of whom has EVER run a company into bankruptcy or failed to massively increase the standard of living of the society in general through the application of their brilliant business acumen, wide-ranging knowledge, and excellent people skills. (snark intended).

    Q-comp has largely been an attempt to dodge the underlying issue, involved, in teacher pay:

    (as recent drops in applicants for teaching jobs across the state have demonstrated),…

    we’re not paying teachers enough, nor offering them enough respect and support as they do a very tough job,…

    to provide sufficient “incentives” for people to actually enter the field.

    If we want more excellent teachers, we’ll have to provide compensation, admiration, and respect sufficient to give our nation’s best and brightest reason to enter the profession.

    Even if we expand Q-comp statewide, it’s not going to accomplish that.

Leave a Reply