Nonprofit, nonpartisan journalism. Supported by readers.

Donate

Community Voices features opinion pieces from a wide variety of authors and perspectives. (Submission Guidelines)

Could public school choice for pre-K be a solution to the budget impasse?

The Minnesota Legislature has a long history as pioneer in public school choice. Why not extend this to preschool programs for 4-year olds?

On Monday, legislators passed an E-12 education-funding bill that was vetoed by Gov. Mark Dayton, as it lacks funding for preschool for 4-year-olds.

Ember Reichgott JungeEmber Reichgott Junge

I suggest a solution that may be acceptable to all: public school choice for preschool. The Minnesota Legislature has a long history as pioneer in public school choice. Why not extend this to preschool programs for 4-year-olds?

Parents, teachers and school districts who want to create a public preschool program can apply as a nonprofit organization or school district to create a program customized to their needs for the 2015-2016 school year. Preschool leaders will enter into a three-year contract with the Department of Education and commit to certain outcomes in their contract for each year. Preschool leaders will be held accountable for results, or their program may be closed by the department.

Public school choice meets the needs of the competing parties. Here’s why.

Pre-K choice, not universal Pre-K. Only those parents or educators who desire a public, tuition-free option for preschool will create and enroll children in the preschool. Public funding will follow the student. The cost will be far less than universal pre-K, yet meet existing demand. The Legislature can allocate a specific amount to start the program. If demand increases, the Legislature can increase funding for more pre-K opportunities in the future.

Accountable for results. Not all preschool programs are created equal in quality. Under this proposal, preschool leaders will commit to certain performance results, or their program may be closed.

Access for every child. Public choice preschool programs will be open to every child, as every child deserves an effective education. Many low-income children will be served, as will other children who can benefit from early education. Parental engagement will likely be a key motivating force for founding groups.

Evaluation data. Data regarding demand and results will guide the Legislature as to growth of tuition-free preschool opportunities for the future.

Public school choice for preschool provides freedom to choose, effective education for every child, and effective and efficient use of tax dollars. Most of all, it provides opportunity for Minnesota families and their youngsters.

Democrats and Republicans can all find something to like in this nation-leading, innovative approach. Supporters of private scholarships and universal preschool can all find something to like. This approach combines elements of open enrollment and chartering, both familiar public school choice options already available to Minnesota families.

And policymakers? They will bring closure to the legislative session as they impact the lives of future generations.

Former DFL state senator Ember Reichgott Junge is the author of Minnesota’s public school choice initiatives of open enrollment and chartering.

WANT TO ADD YOUR VOICE?

If you’re interested in joining the discussion, add your voice to the Comment section below — or consider writing a letter or a longer-form Community Voices commentary. (For more information about Community Voices, email Susan Albright at salbright@minnpost.com.)

You can also learn about all our free newsletter options.

Comments (2)

  1. Submitted by Paul Brandon on 05/22/2015 - 09:49 am.

    Pre-K for the rich

    Well funded communities will probably opt for this sort of quasi-public pre-K.
    It’s not clear what the funding mechanism will be, but it will probably cost whatever organization sets it up something.
    This means that cash strapped poor (read inner city and rural) areas will be less likely to provide this education than wealthy suburbs.
    And the choice will be made by adults (not necessarily all of them parents); the children who will be most directly affected have no say. That’s why we provide public education for ALL students.
    Dayton is simply saying that current research shows the importance of starting education before the traditional kindergarten age.
    Junge’s proposal is a fudge.
    Finally, Minnesota is a pioneer in giving students a choice in which public school to attend; not whether to attend public schools (read vouchers).

  2. Submitted by Ron Gotzman on 05/22/2015 - 02:16 pm.

    Public School Choice?

    Is this another way of saying …”union public school choice?”

Leave a Reply