Skip to Content

Support MinnPost

Community Voices features opinion pieces from a wide variety of authors and perspectives. (Submission Guidelines)

Presidential campaign entertains but does not enlighten

REUTERS/Mario Anzuoni
Most of the Republican presidential contenders reflect a take-no-prisoners approach in their positions on foreign and security policy as well as domestic concerns.

The 2016 presidential campaign, which already seems well past its shelf life with more than a year still to go, has provided more than the usual collection of foolishness, pratfalls and dangerous inanities. The Democrats have certainly contributed their share of diversions, led by Hillary Clinton’s email fiasco, an unforced error that has become the mother of all gifts that keeps on giving.

And then there’s the Republican grab bag of contenders. Dr. Ben Carson, for example, has demonstrated the classic maxim that you should “stay in your lane.” His brilliance as a surgeon does not necessarily make his political utterances smart, relevant or even sensible. His observation that the Holocaust could have been prevented if Germany hadn’t had such tight gun control laws is proof positive that Dr. Carson should have stuck to medicine. Ditto for his statement that victims could have blocked a mass murderer if only they’d dare to rush him.

Donald Trump, for his part, has entertained us with insults, bravado and bold if empty promises. The popularity of such candidates shows the degree of citizen anger and dissatisfaction. Many are simply not happy with the country’s direction and support such outsiders to poke a finger in the eye of Washington and the political establishment. It’s an understandable impulse, though it might be better coupled with an insistence on leaders with the experience, ideas and practical ability to actually govern.

The nature of our political discourse

Back in the 19th century we had a major political group called the “Know Nothing” party. The party disappeared long ago, but the label could be applied to much of our political discourse in recent years. If we can’t get our way in Congress, let’s shut down the federal government. If the deficit is too high, let’s stop paying the bills. If dealing with climate change is inconvenient, let’s find a scientist or two who has doubts so we can safely ignore it. Don’t tax you, don’t tax me, tax that guy behind the tree. 

If the president doesn’t agree with our ideas, he must be a fascist, a socialist, an alien, Muslim, terrorist or all of the above. A diplomatic deal to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons must be bad because it was negotiated by this man (along with the leaders of all the other major powers, a subtlety we ignore). If we don’t like parts of his health care reform, let’s throw the baby out with the bath water. Rinse and repeat – 50 times.

And if our own party leader dares to compromise occasionally with this chief executive, throw the bum out!

This is not so much politics as war. Most of the Republican presidential contenders reflect this take-no-prisoners approach in their positions on foreign and security policy as well as domestic concerns. If we would only be stronger and tougher, we – and the rest of the world – would be much better off. As Hemingway wrote, “Isn’t it pretty to think so?”

We already spend more on military matters than the next 10 countries in the world combined – and most of those are our allies. Yet Carly Fiorina offers a general’s shopping list for more troops and planes and ships. She doesn’t say how more U.S. military muscle would help resolve bitter internal conflicts in Syria, Ukraine, Iraq, Afghanistan or elsewhere around the globe.

World knows what Jeb won't acknowledge

Jeb Bush’s final answer when asked about the U.S. invasion of Iraq was that the “surge” a few years later was a success. Do you walk to school or take your lunch? The world knows that the United States made a horrendous mistake in attacking Iraq under false pretenses in 2003, whether or not our would-be leaders can bring themselves to admit it. It is also obvious to observers elsewhere that we have failed miserably in a 12-year effort to prepare Iraqi security forces that can be relied on to defend their own country.

The United States helped win two world wars, built the world’s greatest economy, championed democratic values, and has a record of accomplishments second to none. But being an exceptional nation does not mean we are without flaws. In fact, a bit more humility about past errors and limits on our ability to unilaterally influence future developments would increase rather than diminish respect for us abroad.

Americans should insist that presidential contenders engage in less grandstanding and quit mindlessly blaming our incumbent president for all the world’s wrongs. What we need instead is serious debate about how to heal our differences at home and confront our challenges abroad.

Dick Virden is a retired Senior Foreign Service Officer. He lives in Plymouth.

WANT TO ADD YOUR VOICE?

If you're interested in joining the discussion, add your voice to the Comment section below — or consider writing a letter or a longer-form Community Voices commentary. (For more information about Community Voices, email Susan Albright at salbright@minnpost.com.)

Get MinnPost's top stories in your inbox

Related Tags:

Comments (4)

Agreed

The reason the GOP front runners are front runners is a result of a grade school mentality where the younger sibling is justifiably irritated by always being compared to their older sibling, but then irrationally counters by being every bad thing that their older sibling is not. The public SHOULD be upset by the BS in the government. But the answer is not a childish temper tantrum. This is NOT reality TV, it's actual true reality, and the consequences could very well hurt.

Personally, I believe a lot of the anti-intellectualism revolving around our political system and voters could be reined in by re-instituting the draft in which no one under 40 is exempt unless there is significant mental or physical disability. No amount of money or college should buy a way out. That way, when the presidential candidates come out thumping their chests, the electorate might actually have to consider the consequences--they or their children might end up dead as a result of warmongering. Better yet, I think that the children of federal politicians, including Congress and the White House, should have a greater chance of being drafted into infantry than anyone else, and maybe they'll stop thinking that funneling taxpayer dollars into the privately-owned military-industrial complex is such a good idea.

The anger comes from years

The anger comes from years and years of broken promises by elected officials. I felt when the USA invaded Iraq we getting into a mess back with Bush, I was equally dismayed with the Obama's administration either ignorance or stupidity with the Arab Spring and what that was going to spawn. Neither total involvement or total withdrawal has worked. We elect our leaders to solve problems and look ahead with some sort of competency. That has not worked for us in foreign policy.
On the domestic front after 7 years of Hope and Change the middle class is worse off, black unemployment is off the charts, we are spending more money than ever as a government and the 1% plus Wall Street are doing better than ever while all others struggle, Dodd/Frank has made banking issues worse (less small bank and credit unions lending), race relations worse than in the 60's, identity politics are rampant, hate the rich, believe in marriage being 1 man 1 women= homophobe, believe in strong borders= anti immigrant the list goes on and on. This is after the economy totally collapsed under Bush and all the buy outs that just fed into the crony capitalistic system started. The past 15 years with Bush and Obama is what has folks pissed off.
Rachel, it is not just a GOP thing the Dems have their fingers all over it also. The anger folks from both parties are feeling is not a grade school mentality it is seeing their lives being hampered by elected officials not be helped by them.

Don't even try

to blame "both sides" for the mess in government. The mess is 99.9% caused by the party you vote for.

Obviously, we need more

Obviously, we need more Democratic candidate debates. There's more substance, less "entertainment" there.