Nonprofit, nonpartisan journalism. Supported by readers.

Community Voices features opinion pieces from a wide variety of authors and perspectives. (Submission Guidelines)

Addressing climate and peace in Paris and Minnesota

REUTERS/Charles Platiau
Along with some 45,000 delegates from 196 nations, we are among the dozens of Minnesotans at COP21 in Paris, a multigenerational mix from colleges and universities, government bodies, and business.

As world leaders work to negotiate a global climate treaty at the United Nations COP21 summit in Paris this week, they do so in the midst of a city grieving from recent terrorist attacks. From the flower-lined public memorials to the security dogs and vest-wearing police officers at the conference, we are reminded that this historic conference takes place at a crucial moment for the global community. The Paris attacks force us to see the convergence of our two biggest global challenges — security and climate change — and has awakened leaders to the importance of integrating peace, security, sustainability and climate solutions.

Along with some 45,000 delegates from 196 nations, we are among the dozens of Minnesotans at COP21 in Paris, a multigenerational mix from colleges and universities, government bodies, and business. This is a unique opportunity for the global community, and for us as Minnesotans, to collaborate on shared solutions.

Dual objectives

The decision to continue COP21 in the wake of terrorist attacks demonstrated solidarity in the face of events that threaten to divide the global community. Now more than ever, politicians must formally acknowledge the inextricable link between climate change and global peace and stability. Both delegates to the United Nations as well as our local Minnesota leaders should design policy that incorporates these dual objectives within a unified framework. At both the local and global level, it starts with being a good neighbor, caring for the place you call home, and engaging those who live around you.

French President François Hollande set the stage at the opening of COP21 earlier this week with his powerful statement: “What is at stake at this climate conference is peace.” President Barack Obama called the decision to continue the negotiations in Paris an “act of defiance.” He asked, “What greater rejection of those who would tear down our world than marshaling our best efforts to save it?” When Jordan’s King Abdullah II shared the podium, he reminded the world that his country receives the most Syrian refugees, and stated that conflict and climate change are the dual wars of our generation. All of the 150 leaders assembled in Paris shared a single sentiment: that climate solutions at the Paris conference must simultaneously secure a peaceful, sustainable, and equitable future for humanity.

Professor Jack Dewaard, a University of Minnesota expert on population and migration and one of our delegates to COP21, said that increasing evidence demonstrates a link between climate change and human migration patterns. Whether they are “shocks” — destructive, rapid-onset events — or processes that emerge gradually over time, climate change cannot be separated from other causes (economic, political, sociocultural, etc.) of migration. National migration policies often fail to recognize these complex dynamics.  

Dayton’s leadership

Our state leaders get this, and take responsibility for our role as global citizens. Gov. Mark Dayton signed the Under2MOU, joining 6 other states and 64 different jurisdictions from 20 countries and 5 continents, collectively representing the largest economy in the world, in a pledge to limit emissions to a level necessary to keeps warming to under 2 degrees C.   Minnesota also has a history of welcoming refugees fleeing hardship and seeking opportunity. When 22 governors announced last month they would turn away migrants fleeing Syrian violence, Dayton announced a contrary stance. “The terrorists would have us walking around our streets eyeing people who don’t look like us, who have different color, different nationality, different religion, different language, and feeling like everyone is a threat to us,” Dayton said. “That’s ultimately the greatest threat to our civilization.”

If COP21 is successful at finally getting the nations of the world to agree on the imperative of shifting to clean and renewable energy, it will not end there. Whatever is decided in Paris will only take effect if cities, states, regions, and individuals take action. We call on Minnesotans to protect their families, communities, and quality of life by taking on this challenge. We also expect that Minnesotans will do the right thing when it comes to supporting people around the world who want the same things we do:  stability, safety, and opportunity for their families and communities.  As the world is trying to come together despite our differences, so must each of us in our own communities. 

Minnesota has been a leader in embracing refugee communities and ushering in renewable energy and successful climate solutions. Here in Minnesota, let’s strive to be the best neighbors possible, both as stewards of our planet and as welcoming and inclusive community members.

Ellen Anderson is the executive director of the University of Minnesota’s Energy Transition Lab, a former state senator and a former chair of the Public Utilities Commission. Laura Humes and Kayla Walsh are seniors at Macalester College. 


If you’re interested in joining the discussion, add your voice to the Comment section below — or consider writing a letter or a longer-form Community Voices commentary. (For more information about Community Voices, email Susan Albright at

Comments (4)

  1. Submitted by joe smith on 12/10/2015 - 04:48 pm.

    Considering the earth’s temperature has risen 0.06 degrees C the past 15 years, I think we are safe on the 2 degrees C goal. The great threat to our civilization is not the “threat of terrorism”, it is actual terrorism that takes place. Terrorism like just happened in California or Boston bombings or Fort Hood shootings or Chattanooga recruiting center shooting. Considering 82% of Americans feel it will happen again and we are not safe here at home, I think maybe we should be a bit more diligent on our own security and put global warming on the back burner.

    We didn’t bomb the ISIS oil tankers or the actual oil drill sites for fear of global warming and allowed ISIS to earn money. With that time and money they were able to plan the Paris attack. That is something we should get concerned about!

  2. Submitted by Todd Hintz on 12/11/2015 - 01:08 pm.

    Security & Global Warming

    Some Americans feel they should be afraid of terrorism on our soil from Syrian refugees. But is that really true? How many people have been injured of died at the hands of refugees? How many have died from home grown white boy terrorists?

    Hint: it’s a pittance, especially when compared to the number of people murdered via guns per year (~15,000) or the number of people killed by guns (suicides, accidents, etc.), which runs about 30,000 per year.

    Terrorists may sound scary–the base root of their name is terror after all–but the chance of being killed by one is pretty small.

    Contrast that with global warming, which stands to displace hundreds of millions of people from their homes. Think Syria looks bad with a few people displaced? Kick that up a couple of factors and then see what the results are. It’ll make today’s refugee crisis look like a walk in the park.

    People need to think rationally about issues and make a clear distinction between low risk/low impact issues and high risk/high impact ones. So far all I’ve seen from climate deniers is a lot of head in the sand tactics to avoid looking the issue square in the eye and addressing the evidence at face value.

  3. Submitted by Moira Heffron on 12/11/2015 - 11:41 pm.

    The connection

    Thanks, Todd, for your reflections. I think Pope Francis has suggested this as well–we really need to be aware of the population presssure from climate change. And perhaps find a radical place to stand where we realize we are all in this together. But this is a tough one. If my country is being desertified or washed away because of your appetite for energy, I’m probably gonna condemn your lifestyle. Just sayin’.

  4. Submitted by rolf westgard on 12/12/2015 - 04:42 pm.

    Tha final conference document

    has emerged. It is as bland and toothless as the output of all the other COPs in Copenhagen, Rio, Cancun, New York City, etc. 40,000 or so got to burn a lot of fossil fuels as they travelled and then enjoyed Paris hotels and restaurants. They don’t hold these gatherings in subSaharan Africa or Bangladesh, places that are supposed to suffer most from global warming.
    They also use the term climate change when they mean global warming. GW is awkward when there hasn’t been any in 20 years. With climate change they can blame any weather event on CO2, one part in 2500 in the atmosphere.

Leave a Reply