Community Voices features opinion pieces from a wide variety of authors and perspectives. (Submission Guidelines)

Opposing the Cuba embargo meshes with Minnesota spirit and culture

REUTERS/Enrique de la Osa
The United States gave the embargo a shot.

Growing up in South Florida, I was used to conversations about U.S. policy toward Cuba. It made sense: Cuba is just 90 miles off the coast, Florida has the highest concentration of Cuban-Americans in the country, and culturally the Miami area has a lot more in common with its mojito-drinking neighbors to the south than the sweet tea-brewing evangelicals in the state’s panhandle or the Ovaltine-imbibing retirees just about everywhere else around them.

tane danger portrait
Tane Danger

It was less expected, however, to hear a Minnesotan taking a prominent lead in on U.S.’s relationship with Cuba. Stranger still, that Minnesotan was GOP Rep. Tom Emmer, speaking on stage at the improv comedy show I host. Emmer, however, wasn’t joking about wanting to lift the 50-year embargo against Cuba.

Why would a freshman member of Congress from a state 1,800 miles from Cuba and with less than 0.1 percent of its population identifying as Cuban buck his party’s leadership to sponsor a bill lifting the Kennedy-era economic blockade? As with most things, economics has something to do with it.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce estimates that the embargo costs the United States $1.2 billion annually in lost export revenue. And as Eric Schwartz, dean of the Humphrey School of Public Affairs at the University of Minnesota, told MinnPost earlier this year, Minnesota’s agriculture industry sees some of the most to gain with lifting of the embargo.

Cuba currently imports 80 percent of its food, and although some limited agricultural exceptions were made to the U.S. embargo a decade ago, the complex legal wrangling stifles much of the industry’s export potential. A Texas A&M study estimated that fully lifting the embargo would produce 6,000 new agricultural-sector jobs in the United States. Minnesota-based Cargill is among the agricultural giants eager to engage this new market.

Something more to it

So there are national and district-level economic interests that drive Emmer’s political push to end the embargo. But I think there is something more to it, something that helps explain why so many of Minnesota’s political leaders of both parties have taken a stand against the embargo, while members of Congress from other states with agricultural, medical or tourism sectors that stand much to gain in a post-embargo world have not.

Minnesotans, if nothing else, are a practical people. Living through eight months of winter (with just four hours of sunlight each day and everything uphill both ways) leaves most of us with little patience for anything that’s clearly not working. If you have boots with poor traction, you don’t wait to slip on the ice for 50 years without getting new ones. If you’ve got a recipe for cranberry bars that always turns out bitter and dry, you don’t keep bringing them to the school bake sale. If you have a football team that never wins a Super Bowl – well that’s a different story.

The one thing people on all sides of the Cuba debate can agree upon is that the embargo is clearly not working. Congressional legislation that codified the embargo into law declared it would only be lifted when Cuba legalized all political activity, released all political prisoners, committed to free and fair elections in the transition to democracy, granted freedom to the press and allowed labor unions.

Fifty years of embargo has done little to achieve those goals. The Castros will have outlasted 10 U.S. presidents before their handpicked successor takes over in 2018 – and not by democratic means. As of July 2015, Cuba was still holding 60 political prisoners, according to Amnesty International. At least two-dozen are being held for participating in peaceful political protests.

Political cover for any complaint

Instead of driving change, the embargo has provided the Castro regime with political cover for virtually any complaint against it. Whenever Cuba faces domestic troubles, whether the food shortages of the early 1990s or ongoing currency crises, the regime points to the embargo. And the Cuban people regularly follow suit.

There is evidence that the argument has salience beyond the island as well. Earlier this year, a United Nations vote calling on the U.S. to end the blockade was passed 191–2, with only Israel joining the U.S. defending the embargo.

The United States gave the embargo a shot. After 50 years, there’s been little progress toward the embargo’s stated goals, the economic harm to U.S. industries is in the billions of dollars, and virtually every other country on the globe is telling us to cut it out.

So in Minnesota fashion, perhaps we should move on from something that’s clearly not working and try something else. It’s that spirit that has allowed Minnesotans to survive generations of winters. It drives our artists and businesses to be some of the most innovative in the world. And it ought to continue to inform our political leaders.

Just don’t apply it to Vikings fans. 

Tane Danger is the co-founder and host of The Theater of Public PolicyYou can follow him on Twitter at @TaneDanger.

WANT TO ADD YOUR VOICE?

If you’re interested in joining the discussion, add your voice to the Comment section below — or consider writing a letter or a longer-form Community Voices commentary. (For more information about Community Voices, email Susan Albright at salbright@minnpost.com.)

You can also learn about all our free newsletter options.

Comments (7)

  1. Submitted by Robert Moffitt on 12/14/2015 - 10:39 am.

    Good for Rep. Emmer

    He’s doing the right thing in regards with our relationship with Cuba. Well done, sir.

    • Submitted by John Garceau on 12/14/2015 - 11:47 am.

      Are you sure Robert?

      I see ads for Tom running for reelection, There is a lot of talk out there that Tom only represents his SuperPac donors, he is in big trouble already. #KeepRepEmmerHonest.

      • Submitted by Robert Moffitt on 12/14/2015 - 02:57 pm.

        There’s a lot we won’t agree on…

        …but Cuba isn’t one of them. Senator Klobuchar is also leading the way on normalization with Cuba.

  2. Submitted by John Garceau on 12/14/2015 - 11:41 am.

    Tom Emmer and Big Ag.

    Why do you think Tom went to Cuba and Africa lately? Not for humanitarian needs, but to open markets for Big Ag. The same international corporations that support trade agreements that would screw all other segments of our society. This guy is a joke and DOES NOT represent his constituents.

    • Submitted by RB Holbrook on 12/14/2015 - 04:31 pm.

      Maybe So

      Rep. Emmer is doing the right thing, perhaps for the wrong reason.

      Would you rather keep the embargo in place so big business does not take advantage of it?

  3. Submitted by Paul Udstrand on 12/15/2015 - 09:04 am.

    I hate to say it but…

    There are a gazillion and one reasons why this embargo should have been lifted at east 20 years ago, this isn’t about Tom Emmer. The Agro-conglomerate interests are just a fraction of the gigantic advantage lifting the embargo will yield for both countries. It doesn’t really matter why Emmer wants to lift the embargo.

  4. Submitted by James Bendtsen on 12/15/2015 - 11:36 am.

    Lifting embargo benefits Big Ag, Cuban Communists, not people

    The Cuban government is going to massively tax wages of those who get jobs resulting from the lifted embargo and they’ve already re-arrested all the political prisoners they “freed” temporarily as a fake show of increased freedom. Good work Emmer, Klobuchar and obama. Typical politics; all for show and for business.

Leave a Reply